Thursday • May 21 • 2026
Vol.XVIII • No.XXI
Manchester, N.H.
Most people would agree that no free society can survive without a fair, unbiased justice system, one in which everyone is treated equally and no one is above the law. While so many governments around the world are rife with corruption and unequal justice, most Americans agree that, while imperfect, our judicial system has always been the best there is.
After all, we have all the safeguards in place to help ensure integrity in our government and fairness in our justice system. First, there’s our Constitution and our three co-equal branches of government. And we have a free press, intended to serve as the conscience of our government. Then there are the people, citizens who have always banded together to stand against government corruption.
Of course, all that came crashing down for several years while our nation was still young. Less than 100 years after its birth, America became a deeply divided nation, and those divisions erupted into a bloody war between the states.
After the Civil War, it took time for our country to get back on the right track, but Americans eventually did come together to create a world superpower, accomplishing some incredible things – militarily, socially, medically, and scientifically.
But it seems that the very same political party that fought so fiercely to preserve slavery is unhappy with America’s success. Democrats have vowed to fundamentally transform our country. Once again they’re on the wrong side of history, the wrong side of morality. They’re using any means at their disposal to transform our country, and it has again created deep divisions among us. Now, the Democrat Party has begun abusing its political power in a way that would make banana republics envious. It’s employing our justice system as a weapon against its political opponents.
Democrats have always had a tenuous relationship with the law enforcement community. They envision themselves as defenders of the oppressed, and they generally perceive police as oppressors. That was especially apparent during the widespread BLM riots in the summer of 2020. Nearly every Democrat supported the anarchy, calling the riots mostly peaceful protests. Our future vice president even helped bail out some of the protestors. At the same time, they were stereotyping all law enforcement officers as racist. So began their insane movement to defund the police.
But in 2021, that same party discovered how to make the justice system work for them.
On January 6th of that year, a group of protesters, enraged by several unresolved election irregularities, stormed the U.S. Capitol. Democrats saw an opportunity. They redefined the protest as an “insurrection” and brought the full weight of our justice system down on anyone who was there.
But they didn’t stop there. They wanted Donald Trump’s head.
Today we see profoundly biased Democrat prosecutors and judges pretending that they’re above political influence. And hateful, like-minded Democrats close their eyes to their abuses of power, telling themselves that everything is on the up-and-up and that the justice system is working exactly as it should.
But they know exactly what’s really going on. To paraphrase Joe Biden himself, they may be fanatical Democrats, but they’re not stupid.
They know that Democrat lawmakers were in such haste to impeach President Trump, not once, but an unprecedented two times, that they did it without any investigation. Both impeachments lacked merit and failed.
They know that the endless Democrat-controlled hearings on the January 6th incident served no purpose other than to hurt Trump.
They know that the four indictments and 91 individual charges filed against a former president are also unprecedented. They know that the Democrat prosecutors don’t even try to conceal their contempt for him.
They also know that those charges against Trump represent brazen examples of both selective prosecution and election interference.
For when Democrats sanctimoniously parrot the phrase, “No one is above the law,” they’re forgetting the bizarre explanations they invented to defend Democrat politicians who stepped outside the law.
First, there’s this gem: “No reasonable prosecutor would take this case.” Then there were these assurances about Biden’s theft of classified documents: “They were safely locked in his garage with his prized Corvette.” On the bribery allegations? “It’s not influence peddling if the bribes only go to his family members.” And there was the congressman who suggested that Biden, his wayward son and “business associate,” arranged a conference call to “talk about the weather.” Sometimes outright lies worked best for them: “The border is secure.”
But Democrats, handicapped by blind hatred, see nothing out of the ordinary in those unrelenting attacks on President Trump. Objective, clear-thinking Americans see a different picture. They can only conclude that they’re witnessing a political feeding frenzy – not the even-handed administration of justice.
As Democrats continue tinkering with our justice system, they’re engaging in an incredibly dangerous gambit. When citizens start to question the fairness of their justice system, when they believe it’s been corrupted, they lose respect for it. That inevitably leads to social unrest, widespread anarchy, and the eventual disintegration of society. Many would say it’s already begun.
The post For Democrats, Justice is a One-Way Street appeared first on Granite Grok.
In the ever-evolving world of skincare, the Hydroluxx Facial has emerged as a revolutionary treatment. Combining advanced technology with the fundamentals of skin hydration and rejuvenation, this facial offers a comprehensive solution for those seeking radiant and healthy skin. Unlike traditional facials, the Hydroluxx Facial uses a unique blend of water, oxygen, and serums to cleanse, exfoliate, and hydrate the skin deeply.
What is a Hydroluxx Facial?A Hydroluxx Facial is a non-invasive skincare treatment designed to cleanse, exfoliate, and hydrate the skin. It utilizes a specialized device that delivers a combination of water and oxygen at high pressure, along with nutrient-rich serums. This process helps to remove dead skin cells, unclog pores, and infuse the skin with essential nutrients. The result is a refreshed, glowing complexion with improved texture and tone.
The Process of a Hydroluxx FacialThe Hydroluxx Facial offers numerous benefits, making it a popular choice among skincare enthusiasts:
The Hydroluxx Facial is suitable for a wide range of skin types and concerns. It is particularly beneficial for individuals with:
The Hydroluxx Facial represents a significant advancement in skincare technology, offering a comprehensive solution for achieving healthy, glowing skin. By combining deep cleansing, gentle exfoliation, and intense hydration, this treatment addresses a wide range of skin concerns and delivers noticeable results. Whether you are looking to combat acne, reduce signs of aging, or simply maintain a healthy complexion, the Hydroluxx Facial is a worthwhile addition to your skincare routine. Its non-invasive nature and customized approach make it suitable for individuals of all skin types, ensuring that everyone can enjoy the benefits of this innovative facial treatment.
The post Introduction to Hydroluxx Facial appeared first on Granite Grok.
A wee bit late in coming – yes! Last October, we had our first Groktoberfest. A time for Conservatarian (Conservative & Libertarian) activists to come together to yak, eat, and listen to a few people tell us their stories (and raise some money).
At that event, I announced my retirement from the ‘Grok, which I had founded in 2006. Family issues that HAD to take priority. With that, I went into that Quiet Night and didn’t write anything until last week.
My keyboard went silent, so it has taken seven months (I was actually only semi-retired) to process and post this (and the following) video clip.
Given that Groktoberfest was about GraniteGrok and the 18 years that we’ve been serving NH, the micro-interview question for Rep. Jim Kofalt (Grokster and 603 Alliance Board member) was, “What was the reason all these folks returned, time after time after time, to read our opinions, hear about our political activism, and ride along with investigations we had done over the years?”
Short and to the point:
!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u359331"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");
Rumble("play", {"video":"v4twzxt","div":"rumble_v4twzxt"});
More coming
The post Night Cap: “What is the most important thing that GraniteGrok has brought to NH?” appeared first on Granite Grok.
When it comes to overcoming addiction, the decision to seek help is a monumental step. But choosing the right place for treatment can be just as crucial. If you’re living in New Hampshire and considering rehab, you might not have thought about traveling out of state. Specifically, Houston, Texas, offers unique advantages that could make your recovery journey more successful. Here’s why hopping on a plane to Houston might be the best decision for your addiction rehab.
Escape Damaging Triggers and EnvironmentsBreaking free from addiction often requires a fresh start, far away from the environment where the addiction took root. Houston offers a complete change of scenery, helping you escape the familiar places and faces associated with your substance use. Staying close to home might mean you’re constantly surrounded by triggers that could lead to relapse. By traveling to Houston, you remove yourself from these distractions, giving you the space to focus solely on your recovery.
Houston’s diverse landscape, from bustling city life to serene parks and green spaces, provides a variety of settings to support your healing. The city’s size and diversity also mean you’ll find a range of activities and support systems to help you build a new, healthier lifestyle. Whether you prefer the calm of nature or the energy of a big city, Houston has something to offer that can aid your recovery process.
Access to Top-Tier Medical Professionals and FacilitiesHouston is home to some of the nation’s leading medical facilities and professionals specializing in addiction treatment. This access to top-tier healthcare is one of the strongest reasons to consider rehab in Houston. The city boasts numerous world-class hospitals and treatment centers with experts who are well-versed in the latest addiction therapy techniques and technologies.
Preventing drug addiction relapse is often a matter of receiving the right care at the right time. Houston’s medical community is equipped with cutting-edge resources and offers numerous different treatment options that might not be available in New Hampshire. From detox programs to intensive inpatient therapy, you can find comprehensive care tailored to your specific needs. The quality of medical support in Houston increases your chances of a successful recovery.
Strong Support Networks and Aftercare ProgramsRecovery doesn’t end when you complete a rehab program; ongoing support is vital for maintaining sobriety. Houston offers extensive aftercare programs and support networks designed to help individuals transition from rehab back to everyday life. These programs include everything from sober living homes to outpatient therapy and support groups.
Joining a strong support network in Houston can make all the difference in staying sober. The city has a thriving recovery community where you can connect with others who understand what you’re going through. These connections provide emotional support, practical advice, and a sense of belonging that can be incredibly beneficial as you navigate life after rehab. Plus, being in a new city can help you build a fresh network of sober friends and activities, reinforcing your commitment to a healthier lifestyle.
The Benefits of Specialized Holistic Rehab ProgramsIn Houston, you’ll find a variety of specialized programs that take a holistic, whole person, approach to addiction recovery. This means they treat the physical aspects of addiction alongside the crucial mental, emotional, and spiritual components. Holistic rehab programs in Houston might include therapies like yoga, meditation, art therapy, and acupuncture, alongside traditional treatments like counseling and medication-assisted therapy.
The value of a specialized holistic rehab program lies in its comprehensive approach to healing. These programs recognize that addiction affects every part of a person’s life, and therefore, recovery should address all these areas. By focusing on the whole person, holistic rehab in Houston can help you build a more balanced and fulfilling life. Whether it’s through mindfulness practices that reduce stress or creative therapies that allow for emotional expression, these programs offer tools that can be vital for long-term sobriety.
Cost-Effective and Comprehensive CareWhile the idea of traveling to another state for rehab might seem expensive, Houston offers cost-effective options that can provide significant value. Many treatment centers in Houston offer high-quality care at prices that are competitive or even lower than those in other parts of the country. This affordability doesn’t mean a compromise in the quality of care; rather, it reflects the broad range of options available.
Comprehensive care in Houston means you’ll have access to various treatment modalities under one roof. This can include detox, residential treatment, outpatient programs, and aftercare support. The convenience of receiving all these services in one place can streamline your recovery process and reduce the stress of coordinating multiple aspects of your treatment. Plus, some rehab centers in Houston work with insurance providers to help cover the costs, making it more accessible for those who need financial assistance.
The post Why Should You Fly to Houston for Addiction Rehab Instead of Staying in New Hampshire? appeared first on Granite Grok.
Is this the end of Section 230, a law that shields tech companies from liability for the third-party content they host? Will the sky fall without 230?
Recently, the House Energy and Commerce Committee proposed a bipartisan bill that would sunset Section 230 at the end of 2025: “Our bill gives Big Tech a choice: Work with Congress to ensure the internet is a safe, healthy place for good, or lose Section 230 protections entirely.”
While the 230 “experts” will have a lot to say on this topic, as an engineer, I prefer to start with real-world examples, not abstract talking points that sound nice on Twitter but don’t work in real life.
Let’s start with how Section 230 affected the child-porn victims in Doe v. Twitter (N.D. Cal. 2021).
In a nightmare for any parent, the victims encountered a perpetrator on Snapchat who pretended to be a 16-year-old girl. After this perpetrator enticed the victims to send nude photos, they extorted the victims to send even more explicit content. The perpetrator then posted this child porn on Twitter; the victims learned about it from their classmates.
Despite numerous reports from multiple users, Twitter did nothing — even after asking for and receiving a copy of one victim’s ID. They only changed their tune when a federal agent intervened.
The victims then sued, credibly alleging that Twitter violated federal child porn laws. Twitter, for its part, did not contest those allegations. They merely argued that Section 230 barred the victims’ legal claim. The court agreed.
Yet when Congress tried to fix that problem with EARN-IT — a bill that would carve federal and state child-porn laws out of 230 — the 230 “experts” reacted like it was a five-alarm fire, resorting to a dirty playbook of tactics that rivaled the nastiness of the net neutrality debates.
Groups like the Taxpayers Protection Alliance spread four-Pinocchio lies about EARN-IT, such as this whopper: “If platforms choose not to encrypt data, the bill requires them to track and identify all users for age verification purposes.” This claim is so far from the truth that the only appropriate response is the “everyone in this room is now dumber” rant from “Billy Madison.”
And may God have mercy on the souls of the 230 “experts” who consider it wise to resort to dirty tactics on a bill meant to stop child porn. Even the Big Tech companies would never tarnish their brand by directly engaging in those sorts of tactics. Instead, they do it indirectly via their trade associations like NetChoice. If it feels like Congress is just throwing its hands up in the air with this proposal to sunset 230, it would be easy to understand why.
So what happens if Section 230 disappears not just for child-porn laws, but for every law? Would the sky fall? No. Not at all. Even without 230’s shield, you still need a sword: a valid cause of action. If you can’t prove that a tech company violated the law, a lawsuit is dead on arrival, with or without 230.
In reality, many frivolous lawsuits that get quickly dismissed due to 230 would still get quickly dismissed without 230, as they don’t credibly allege a violation of any law. Under federal civil procedure, the defendant will win an early motion to dismiss under rule 12(b)(6) if the plaintiff fails to state a claim; this is the same stage at which lawsuits typically get dismissed due to 230.
Claims that censorship of conservatives will increase without 230 are also balderdash. No law makes “disinformation” or “hate speech” illegal — and such a law would violate the First Amendment anyway. There are laws for real problems like child porn, though. Realistically, without 230, there would be more moderation of real problems and less censorship of fake problems.
(The 230 “experts” will quickly point out here that 230 has an exception for federal criminal law. What they often leave out, though, is that this exception only applies to criminal prosecutions by law enforcement. As the child-porn victims in Doe v. Twitter already know, this exception does not apply to civil lawsuits for the same conduct.)
Let’s also dispense with the myth that Section 230 is the “Internet’s First Amendment.” Even without 230, the actual First Amendment would still apply. As a corollary, even without 230, tech companies could not be held strictly liable for every piece of third-party content that they host; strict liability is already unconstitutional per Smith v. California (1959).
If we do repeal and replace 230, though, what should we replace it with? Conservatives, after all, are well-known for using the phrase “repeal and replace” without figuring out the “replace” part. In tech policy, two themes will frequently recur. The first common-sense theme can be summarized in one sentence: “If it’s illegal offline, it should be illegal online.”
The second theme is a uniform national policy. Simply put, the difference between a local coffee shop and a tech startup is that data frequently crosses state lines and coffee does not. As a result, tech companies — both big and small — can get stuck with a patchwork of state laws, which can impose a significant regulatory burden. In a scenario straight out of the song “Hotel California,” if a startup checks out of California and moves to Florida, it may not be able to leave California’s laws behind.
These two themes point to a simple solution: Section 230 should not apply to any federal law. This compromise would protect tech companies from drowning in an endless sea of conflicting state laws, while ensuring that at the federal level, anything that is illegal offline will be illegal online. (Section 230 and state law is a much more nuanced topic.)
In a world where citizens’ voices are often silenced by tech companies’ woke trust and safety departments, things can only get better when those companies are instead governed by laws created by democratic institutions that give every citizen a voice.
Mike Wacker is a software engineer and technologist who has previously served as tech fellow in Congress. Follow him on X.com at @m_wacker.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline, and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.The post Is Congress About To Destroy The Internet? appeared first on Granite Grok.
House Bill 1711 has been marketed as a sensible bipartisan compromise bill to keep firearms out of the hands of once lawful gun owners deemed mentally unfit. It passed the State House with the help of 25 Republicans, but the GOP Majority Senate held hands and tabled it last week.
The bill would have had New Hampshire join other states that provide mental health data as part of any firearms background check. Governor Sununu liked it so much that he said he’d sign it, but he’ll have to wait for a majority of NH State Senators to vote to take it off the table and put it back in play. That seems unlikely with the session winding down. But why would Sununu sign it?
Despite his numerous flaws, he’s been a good doobie on firearms rights. It may not make up for his other failures, but our policy has been and continues to be to ‘thank them’ when they do good and ‘spank them’ when they do wrong. Signing HB1711 into law would be a bad idea.
The bill would, in limited circumstances, work like a red flag law for persons,
(a) Adjudicated as not guilty of a crime by reason of insanity;
(b) Adjudicated as incompetent to stand trial and found by the court to be a danger to themselves or others pursuant to RSA 171-B:2, 135-E:5 or 135:17-a; or
(c) Involuntarily committed to a mental health facility pursuant to RSA 135-C:34-54.
It sounds sensible, and advocates claim that this narrow restriction is common sense gun law, but no matter how you slice it, this is the proverbial camel’s nose. It opens a door that future legislatures will see as a rubber stamp to push the entire red flag camel into the tent.
The types of mental health designations will expand first, and eventually, the court and the lawyer will disappear in the name of public safety. They will say we can’t wait for due process of any kind – act first, process later. It’ll happen because that is the progressive goal, and HB1711 is an effort to get that ball rolling.
Were it to pass, we would also look forward to an army of state-affiliated therapists swelling to find suitable diagnoses to disarm otherwise ordinary and law-abiding citizens.
Remember, the deep state, in both DC and Concord, thinks that disagreeing with them is a sign of mental illness.
Public SafetyPublic safety is the Marcia -Marcia- Marcia of progressive overreach. But if it is such a huge concern, perhaps we should focus on teaching proper safety and (for lack of a better term) carry etiquette. Instead of confusing kids about their gender at the earliest age possible, teach them firearms handling and safety. We used to do it and the nation was safer for it.
Inculcate responsibility and respect. It’s the one thing we haven’t tried in recent decades, and we should because I can’t think of a single place where red flag laws and every other restriction the mostly Democrat gun grabbers have imposed have made the local community safer. Property crime, violent crime, assault, rape, and murder all go up. What makes them go down? Well, if you look at the states with the longest records for low crime, New Hampshire being near the top of that list, they are also the freest states for gun owners. New Hampshire is. That’s not a coincidence.
And HB1711’s bipartisan good intentions aside, while people with mental health issues are a risk, letting legislators down this path is riskier, and once they take the rights, they are not going to give them back.
The post Red Flag Camel’s Nose Fails To Get Under New Hampshire’s Tent appeared first on Granite Grok.
The “social justice” movement that’s taken the nation by storm since last summer has descended as leftists employ absurd lies to impose glaring injustices. Perhaps the biggest of these lies being spread by leftist lawmakers is that Vermonters killed off all the Native Americans and must now pay economic penance.
A vile bill, introduced by 18 misinformed legislators, incorporates fraudulent claims to statutorily inflict hateful vengeance in the name of “social justice.”
H.273, “An act relating to promoting racial and social equity in land access,” proposes to contribute $10 million to a BIPOC-operated bank which will administer the funds for BIPOC applicants to purchase land or housing in “every town in Vermont.” To justify this, the bill incorporates the following fallacious drivel:
“The foundation of our current economic system was built on land that was taken from Abenaki and other Indigenous persons, and the structures of our economic system were constructed with the labor of enslaved persons … The laws and policies of our State and nation severed Indigenous persons from their land while denying them, Black persons, and other Persons of Color from having the opportunity to access and to own land.”
That all sounds horrid, of course, but here’s the thing… It never happened. Not in Vermont, at least. This statute re-writes Vermont’s history, replacing its past with fiction. It attributes violence against Abenakis to all Vermonters, when the reality is that the vast majority of white migrants settled lands nearly empty of Abenaki, back in the 1800s. The Abenaki were nomadic and did not “own land” to be “taken” in the western sense, and the “economic system” alleged in the statute was white subsistence farming, which built Vermont’s economy for some two hundred years—after most Abenaki were gone. The bill alleges that “Centuries of genocide, eugenics, broken treaties, displacement, and land dispossession placed persons of the Abenaki Nations and other Indigenous persons living in Vermont at a great social disadvantage.” While it is true that Abenaki were targeted for forced sterilization, that was a progressive policy of which most white Vermonters were simply not complicit—indeed, poor white farmers were themselves targeted.
The statute also conflates the Abenaki and slaves, yet slavery was prohibited in Vermont by its “laws and policies”—the first Constitution in the nation, in fact, banning slavery. Vermont is so extremely white today because slavery was almost nonexistent in the state’s history. There is no record of Vermont “denying… [people of color]… from having access to land.” It just did not occur, not “systemically,” not ever.
In truth, the historic basis for this kind of legislation is entirely imagined.
Photo of a plaque on the wall of the Vermont State House. The Vermont historical archives are filled with Vermont legislative denunciations of slavery.TRUE BIPOC VERMONT
Black people have never lived in Vermont in significant numbers: the 1960 Census (Table 15) reflects 572 Black residents in 1920, 568 in 1930, 584 in 1940, 443 in 1950, and 519 in 1960. The 1910 U.S. Census identified 34 Native Americans residing in Vermont in 1890, 5 in 1900, and 26 in 1910. But the evidence that this demographic makeup is a result of discrimination—or “barriers to the equal enjoyment and economic benefit of land access and homeownership opportunities based on race and ethnicity,” as H. 273 alleges—is scant.
At one point, the bill even calls out Jim Crow laws… (Vermont, of course, was not a Jim Crow state).
Instead, the bill makes a huge show of condemning historic grievances that “BIPOC” Americans may have with the federal government: the General Allotment Act of 1887 (the Dawes Act); policies started 1934 by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Home Owners’ Loan Corporation that were criticized for “denying Black and brown residents equal access to home mortgages, often offering subprime loans that came with unusually severe terms”; or the 1944 Servicemen’s Readjustment Act which created the G.I. Bill of Rights (“Funds from the bill were only made available to White soldiers returning from war and not BIPOC veterans.”). None of these policies were enacted in Vermont or by Vermonters. At one point, the bill even calls out Jim Crow laws: “The rate of ‘Black land-loss’ can be attributed to Jim Crow, racist practices conducted by the USDA and decades of farm busts.” (Vermont, of course, was not a Jim Crow state).
Still, H. 273 seeks to fund land acquisition for those “who have not had equal access to public or private economic benefits due to race, ethnicity, sex, geography, language preference, immigrant or citizen status, sexual orientation, gender identity, socio-economic status, or disability status.” Hundreds of thousands of white Vermonters, meanwhile, have endured a long history of crushing poverty—a history that “native” Vermonters well know, but a history which those who condemn them recast as “white privilege.”
Most “native” Vermonters (now a pejorative term) understand and are humbled by this history. Poor houses existed in numerous Vermont towns. Sheep farming was once relatively profitable, but the wool market peaked in 1851. Then, Vermont shifted its agriculture to dairy—first butter and cheese lugged to Boston; later, fresh milk. But the opening of the railroads undermined dairy prices, and Vermont dairy farming has been in decline ever since. Over the decades, from 1930 to the present, Vermont dairy suffered an “economic freefall.” Vermont’s dairy farms—its primary industry—shrank from 27,000 in 1927 to barely 600 today. Milk prices dropped by more than half during the Great Depression and never fully rebounded.
Social Justice Warriors proclaim that today’s black Vermonters are owed money and land by their white neighbors…
There were a few black farmers through this period, but blacks were mostly spared the abject misery, alcoholism, and despair that strangled white farm families who often lacked food, clothing, and dental or health care. This is what H.273 now fantastically alleges was a period of white privilege enabled by the exploitation of black and Abenaki labor.
Now Social Justice Warriors proclaim that today’s black Vermonters are owed money and land by their white neighbors, for nebulous crimes such as those routinely alleged (and far from proven) against Abenaki natives. “Native peoples” are routinely invoked by just-off-the-bus agitators who claim that only Native Americans (and them) have the right to declare who owns the land. As former legislator Kiah Morris proclaimed, “Unless you are First Nations, you have no right to claim who are real Vermonters. Nativist political platforms are the basest level of discourse.” SJWs use allegations of historic Native suffering to stake their claim—Kiah herself moved to Vermont from Chicago (where presumably, only native people have a right to claim who are really Chicagoans).
Xusana Davis, Vermont’s Executive Director of Racial Equity, echoes this same manipulation. Having moved to Vermont from New York City six months before COVID-19 struck, Xusana stated in a recent podcast:
“What’s most interesting to me is that when we think about a typical Vermonter, it is often the case that people envision somebody who may be white. Oftentimes, people who are white who maybe are born and raised in Vermont, they’ll say, ‘I’m a native Vermonter.’ And I always think, oh, you’re Abenaki? Because if you’re really a native Vermonter, then you’re probably indigenous to the land.”
But there are no Abenaki “indigenous to the land” in that there are no Abenaki with intact culture, language, or genetics. The Cro Magnon have no indigenous sites remaining either, so perhaps exploitation of them can be similarly understood. Why do newly arrived BIPOC ideologues possess the authority to exact retribution from white Vermonters who have lived on family land for 200 uninterrupted years?
John Klar is an Attorney, farmer, and author. Mostly farmer… And Regular Contributor to GraniteGrok and VermontGrok.
The post Proposed Statute Perverts History appeared first on Granite Grok.
What a speech America’s imposter/figurehead President #DirtyJoeBiden gave at the Morehouse College commencement. Essentially … YOU JUST WASTED FOUR YEARS; YOUR DIPLOMA IS WORTHLESS; NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU LEARN, HOW HARD YOU WORK, IT DOESN’T MATTER BECAUSE AMERICA IS INCURABLY AND PERVASIVELY AND FOREVER RACIST.
What a sick bitch … or more accurately, team of sick-bitches because #DirtyJoe obviously was on drugs and neither wrote the speech or even knew what he was reading … to write/say such things on a day meant to celebrate and inspire the graduates. The sick irony of course is that if any candidate is a RACIST it is #DirtyJoeBiden … if you’re not voting for me then you’re not really Black.
Here is the racist-in-chief spewing hate and division:
The post Joe Biden’s Message To Morehouse Grads … You Need The Great White Father More Than Ever appeared first on Granite Grok.
We want to think we were out in front, telling Donald Trump to stop bragging about Operation Warp Speed. We were early adopters of the change in messaging (early 2021, I think). It didn’t stick then, but when I saw him speak in Claremont, New Hampshire, in Early November 2023, he wasn’t tooting any warp-speed horns.
Regular readers will know I’ve been on 45 for years to back away from all his warp-speed talk. To accept that he was snowballed like many of us and took longer than some to realize it – or, at least, his speech writers took too long.
He didn’t talk about it at all except to say that as president, he would (and I’ll add, try to) block funding to schools that teach CRT, that gender-bending grooming business to young kids, and that impose any mask or vaccine mandate.
Lots of applause.
He also mentioned the need to clean out the bureaucracy, which includes the healthcare industrial complex.
This was long before RFK changed to a third party, but there’s some punditry out there on how this has changed Trump’s view on “vaccines.” It likely has and should at least in how Trump frames it. But this headline strikes me as a bit much: “Trump Voters Are Defecting to Robert Kennedy Over the Vaccine Issue.”
It’s May, 2024. If this issue has you thinking Robert Kennedy Jr. is a better deal for America than DJT then low information voter is a compliment. As I noted here, RFK would be a great big finger in the eye as a pick to head HHS in a Trump administration.
Wouldn’t it be the best thing ever if he nominated Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to be his Secretary of Health and Human Services? I realize that Kennedy’s ascension to the gig would be another hurdle (similar to the one just described), but this is a dream sequence, so go with it. The smoke clears. He gets the job, and Trump says, welcome to the team, no go clean that shit up.
Would anyone object to that, assuming we woke up and it actually happened?
But when you get off the health freedom plantation (RFKJR is also good on deregulation), he’s a regular Democrat on much of the rest of his platform, and his VP choice is a dead end for anyone even remotely aware of what being MAGA is supposed to mean.
If RFK Jr.’s progressive proclivities beyond individual health rights and reigning in the regulatory abuses were a risk worth taking, Shanahan, the mega-wealthy, ultra-left-wing albatross, is too much to bear.
She is being marketed as a young, pulled-up her own bootstraps girl lifting herself out of poverty. She loved public school, was sexually harassed in the workplace (at least once), and finally rose to financial and social prominence by marrying a billionaire she later divorced and milked for a small fortune. Be that as it may, these days, she is a left-wing lawyer and a proglodyte “philanthropist” who married into big money, amassed wealth, and is a threat to liberty and individual rights.
Not to take Rick Moran at PJ Media to our tiny little woodshed, but his post is about how Trump has to change his messaging to avoid losing his voters to RFK on the vaccine issue. Again, who are these people he is losing, and are they our equivalent of low-information abortion voters?
We are expected to believe that these young American women will trade jobs, wages, safety in public bathrooms, safety on the street, financial privacy, economic liberty, and health freedom (on everything but abortion) for what amounts to the slim chance they might need to end a pregnancy in the third trimester? That’s the debate in my state.
That seems to be the case. Dems won in 2022 (or at least mitigated losses) running on one side of that debate because no one ran on the other side of it.
It must then follow that Trump supporters will give up a chance at cheap gas and electricity, property rights, secure borders, low taxes, global stability, Combustion engine vehicles, an improved economy, better wages, enemies in check, and safer streets for the chance that the Federal government could stop the Blue States from imposing vaccine mandates. I’m having a hard time with that, not because the Democrats are dumb enough to trade everything for third-trimester abortions – some clearly are – it’s that I can’t imagine Trump’s supporters being equally stupid.
Some, no doubt, are just ask DeSantis supporters. His health freedom message was crystal clear during the early part of the campaign, and he was good on almost everything else. Trump was not clear on health freedom, especially vaccine mandates. But when Trump spoke in Claremont, he said no vaccine or mask mandates for American kids. He promised to investigate the FDA and CDC as part of clearing out the bureaucratic morass and corruption. And he claims he’s set his sights on big pharma, including price gouging and outsourcing manufacture and R&D to foreign nations.
If you didn’t know that until just now, that’s his campaign’s fault. They need to fix that if for no other reason than to make it easier for voters who can’t vote for Biden but might not vote for Trump, which is the real problem from where I sit. Trump isn’t losing his voters to RFK; in fact, I think he has been getting them back as RFKJR’s stances beyond health freedom trickle into the collective consciousness.
He might be losing some fence-sitters because of unclear messaging, but he is getting a lot of middle-of-the-road Democrats, including minorities and women, and that’s his key to a potential numerical victory even Democrats can’t steal.
The post Are Trump Voters Defecting to RFK? appeared first on Granite Grok.
So here is a picture of Joe Biden … America’s figurehead, imposter President … with one of New Hampshire’s extremist Woke-Communists, Little-Miss Angie Brennan.
Look at his eyes!
Are you telling me the people running the Biden Regime are NOT drugging Joe before public appearances? Come on, man … JOE IS HIGH AS A KITE.
I will concede that we cannot see Joe’s left hand … and that the smile on Little-Miss Angie’s face seems contrived or maybe could be a painful grimace. BUT I still believe that #DirtyJoeBiden IS ON DRUGS:
And as for Little-Miss Angie’s #Decency … RECALIBRATE YOUR MORAL COMPASS, BABY GIRL. If your conception of #decency is Biden showering with his daughter, sexually assaulting Tara Reade, touching and sniffing women and children at public events, etc. … you don’t know decency, Baby-Girl.
The post Can You Guess What Drugs Joe Biden Is On? appeared first on Granite Grok.
