I remember way back in the early 2000s when I was exploring my politics. After 9/11, I wanted to know how that might happen and realized years of disinterest left me unprepared to discuss it. Politics. Some might argue I still am. But I tried to learn. I started with the Founding documents and kept going.

Lurking on websites was vital. I could read news and opinions and then skim through comments to see what others felt and why. The first time I dared to add, my voice was likely precarious, but it didn’t end badly. I think Early Red State (2005-2006), and I was nervous, but ideas must be laid out, explored, and tested right or wrong. A few years later, the pile of questions and ideas needed a better outlet, so I started a free WordPress blog. I still have it.

Many articles, connections, and years later, I’ve written on at least a dozen platforms, some for pay and others to get the questions, challenges, thoughts, and observations out of my head. I’m still doing this after fifteen-plus years and probably 25,000 pieces of content later, you probably want me to shut up and tell you who this week’s Commenter of Week is.

I will, but I said all that because we have a lot of folks who aren’t shy about sharing, and at least a few do it as themselves. That’s not a dig on those who don’t or can’t. You have your reasons, and I’m good with that, but at some point, any one of you might want to take the next step as I did, and we’re here for you even if you don’t want to use your actual name. We need to know who you are, but no one else does.

So, congrats to NHnative. You are this week’s winner for this. It wasn’t just a comment but an excellent idea.

 

One of the most significant plagues rotting NH is our court system… reading this article, I don’t have to tell you how bad it is.

I’d like to know why this is okay with the residents of NH, first of all.

Second, I’d like everyone to know that it’s not that hard today to find yourself IN this corrupt court/legal system.. it’s only then will most people understand what a crisis we’ve got here that just rolls on with seemingly no real efforts to fix anything.
So yes, this does really impact us all.

It’s not really IF you’ll have a turn, it’s when.

The majority of folks in NH don’t have the extra money to hire attorneys and take this on like Laurie did.. and this is precisely how this system is designed to work.

Laurie, what I’d love to see you do is start a non-profit, build a team, and help citizens learn what they need to know to represent themselves pro-se to go to court.
NH has a shortage of attorneys, and it’s become more clear that We, The People out here, need somewhere we can go to learn the ropes of taking more and more on ourselves in court.

 

NHnative, if you’d be so kind as to email me an address I can ship to, I’ll send you your “prize.”

To everyone else, again, damn difficult decision. We’ve got more commenters and comments this week, and again, I can only afford to reward one a week at the moment, but I can still give you a shout-out because there was plenty of great stuff. David Ss, Mike Remski, Bowana, Josue Lugo, Neil Johnson, Dan Batten, Gary Davis, Old Vet, Rick O’Shea, Bryan W, Steve Earle, LunarDog made me laugh (was not a finalist for that), Asperous for “Stop referring to “Lia Thomas” as she/her,” NITZAKHON, gramps, Jay Eshelman, Tombstone Gabby, and more.

As a reminder, if you see a comment you think should be considered, email it to me. In the first two weeks, I received one of those, and I’d like a few more each week if possible.

Thanks for reading and commenting!

The post Our Next Comment of the Week Winner Is…? appeared first on Granite Grok.

We were a few months into the COVID chaos – well past the two weeks or fifteen days or whatever the narrative had shifted to to flatten the curve. Masks were not just a mandate but a political statement, and social distancing dots had appeared on floors across the land—six feet, they said, which made no sense.

We went looking and uncovered a source on all things social distancing.

No one can prove it works or does not. There are no clinical trials. In fact, the basis for the theory comes from a 14-years old’s high school science project back in 2006. A computer model developed with the help of her dad, who has no medical training or experience.

Much like medical or cloth masks and quarantining healthy people, none of which had any basis in science, the Machine Media took up the call. Fearmongering pied pipers spread the message across the land, stealing the lives of children in their wake as schools stayed locked down and those that opened months later mandated masks and, yes …distancing.

Last week, one of the founding fathers of COVID-era medical fraud, Tony ‘Little Shoes’ Fauci, admitted under oath that “guidelines to keep six feet of separation — ostensibly to limit the spread of COVID-19 — “sort of just appeared” without scientific input.”

Did someone make it up? They did. It started with then-14-year-old Laura M. Glass, who has long since distanced herself from her “work.” But back then,

Laura, with some guidance from her dad, devised a computer simulation that showed how people – family members, co-workers, students in schools, people in social situations – interact. What she discovered was that school kids come in contact with about 140 people a day, more than any other group. Based on that finding, her program showed that in a hypothetical town of 10,000 people, 5,000 would be infected during a pandemic if no measures were taken, but only 500 would be infected if the schools were closed.

That experiment later became the basis for a paper by Laura’s dad, Robert, “a complex-systems analyst with Sandia National Laboratories. He had no medical training, much less an expertise in immunology or epidemiology.” Robert was the lead author of Targeted Social Distancing Designs for Pandemic Influenza (his daughters also get credit), and, again – he had zero medical training or public health experience, which invited a scathing refutation by some actual medical professionals.

There are no historical observations or scientific studies that support the confinement by quarantine of groups of possibly infected people for extended periods in order to slow the spread of influenza. … It is difficult to identify circumstances in the past half-century when large-scale quarantine has been effectively used in the control of any disease. The negative consequences of large-scale quarantine are so extreme (forced confinement of sick people with the well; complete restriction of movement of large populations; difficulty in getting critical supplies, medicines, and food to people inside the quarantine zone) that this mitigation measure should be eliminated from serious consideration…

One of the authors of that refutation was D.A. Henderson, who is credited with eradicating smallpox, so when the time came to ask whether lockdowns and distancing were sound, the “experts” chose the paper by the systems analyst and his teenage daughter and not the world of a real scientist with practical global experience.

Three years later, Fauci forgets the backstory and goes with, yeah, we don’t know, and no one checked. So, drunken-brainstorming at the CDC or NIH. That would explain a lot about how the situation was mishandled and one of the legitimate digs on the Trump presidency. He let Fauci run the show for too long, and while he openly commented on things with which he disagreed – death percentages were too high, defending the efficacy of HCQ and Ivermectin, it wasn’t enough to protect us from Fauci and his microphone-addicted, attention whores whose guidance on more than just distancing just appeared and – in some cases – contradicted existing scientific input.

“It is clear that dissenting opinions were often not considered or suppressed completely. Should a future pandemic arise, America’s response must be guided by scientific facts and conclusive data.”

That sounds like a mea culpa, but he is also reported to have said: “that the policies and mandates he promoted may, unfortunately, increase vaccine hesitancy for years to come.”

I’m guessing Facui still has a vested financial interest in vaccine uptake, so that statement, to my mind, is less about public health and more about Fauci’s financial legacy.

 

The post Distancing Themselves From Social Distancing appeared first on Granite Grok.

Custom keyrings are multipurpose items with many advantages for businesses. These advantages include creating a memorable brand presence, marketing that is affordable, customised branding, increased client loyalty, and word-of-mouth advertising.

Furthermore, they function as useful and practical advertising items that are exceptionally effective. Businesses must place a high priority on having a superior keyring design if they want to take advantage of all these benefits. In this article, we will explore effective design tips for custom keyrings that guarantee the fullest possible utilisation of their advantages and create a lasting impact on everyone who sees them.

Effective Custom Keyrings: Design Tips for Optimal Impact

To get the maximum benefits of custom keyrings for businesses, these useful design tips must be included in every design strategy. 

Integrate your brand story

A brand story is a narrative that conveys the core principles, goals, and distinctive character of a brand. To fully reap the benefits of these indispensable promotional objects, you must incorporate your business’s story into the design of your custom keyrings as a fundamental practice. Your brand’s mission and values, logo and visual identity, unique selling proposition, personality, cultural influences, interactive elements, and future vision are all components of your brand story. These strategies improve customer engagement, word-of-mouth marketing, memorability, differentiation, brand consistency, and long-lasting impression. They also foster an emotional connection between your brand and the consumer.

Maintain a minimal design for effective custom keyrings

For promotional items to advance clarity of message, timeless appeal, versatility, improved brand recognition, ease of integration of promotional tactics, lower production costs, ease of use, and user-friendliness, their design must be minimalistic. Practices like simplifying shapes, incorporating a simple colour scheme, concentrating on essential components of your brand or message, incorporating clean topography, utilising whitespace, adhering to a consistent design language, maximising scale and proportion, emphasising a single focal point in the design, and streamlining logo elements are some ways to keep the custom keyrings’ design simple.

Consider your target audience when creating custom keyrings

How your brand’s audience will feel about the custom keyrings will have a major impact on their success as marketing tools. Cultural sensitivity, perceived exclusivity, usefulness and practicality, brand connection, relevance and appeal, aesthetic preferences, perceived quality, and word-of-mouth impact should all be evaluated. This is necessary to create custom keyrings that fulfil their intended purpose and leave a lasting impression. Because of this, take your target demographic into consideration when you design the keyrings. Give top priority to elements like user interaction, trends and fashion, colour psychology, cultural sensitivity, functional demands, lifestyle, preferences, and demography. Ensure you perform due diligence when considering your target audience in order to get accurate information about them.

Conclusion 

We have discussed three proactive custom keyring design tips that ought to be included in your design plans. Any business may fully realise the benefits of custom keyrings and get a competitive edge by implementing the tips covered in this article.

The post How to Make Custom Keyrings That Stand Out: An Actionable Guide to Design Strategies appeared first on Granite Grok.

In the category of you can’t make this stuff up. Maine … you know the State where some unelected, unaccountable former ACLU lunatic recently threw Trump off the ballot … is building luxury apartments for illegals. But just keep pretending that the Great Replacement is a “right-wing, conspiracy theory,” as you are being replaced in front of your very eyes.

Maine is now an apartheid state. Illegals have more privileges and rights than actual citizens. Maine, like New Hampshire, is a lost cause. Real Republicans should get the hell out of Maine (and New Hampshire) as fast as possible, and migrate to a State that is not “transforming” America into a socialism-based-on-woke hell-hole.

5 new luxury buildings are going up in Brunswick, Maine to host illegals.

2 years of rent will be paid off by the taxpayers for jobless illegals.

Maine is also supplying them with $100k for legal support to help them with asylum and work authorization.

Woke residents gathered… pic.twitter.com/qGs4PATOdb

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) January 13, 2024

Maine taxpayers are footing the bill for new apartments built specifically for illegal immigrants. They have *two years worth of rent paid for by state taxpayers.
pic.twitter.com/IAPkCK3uoF

— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) January 12, 2024

 

The post Your Government Despises You … Maine Building Luxury Apartments For Illegals appeared first on Granite Grok.

Our bill to end town mask mandates forever has made a surprising reappearance in the Senate thanks to Rep. Juliet Harvey-Bolia and Senator James Gray. The vote will be on the 18th, and we need everyone to call Senator Ricciardi and Senator Avard and urge them to support the floor amendment to SB63.

Let’s kindly persuade them.

 

Tuesday, January 16th, N.H. Senate
Eduacation
LOB, Room 101

9:00 a.m. – OPPOSE –SB343 

Currently contracted, school-based health care clinics do occur, yet apparently there is no current legal authority for this, only for school nurses and physicians to perform various procedures and exams. Parental consent is already required via law. This bill seeks to give legal authority for contracted school health care clinics using money from a federal grant, accepted by the Executive Council. This is part of a larger agenda to create government dependency from cradle to grave, is potentially harmful (2 children last year were vaccinated “accidentally” in schools), and provides no further protections for parental consent.

Schools are for learning reading, writing, and arithmetic and are not meant to become mini health clinics.

Click here to register your disposition.
 Email the committee:
Ruth.Ward@leg.state.nh.us
Carrie.Gendreau@leg.state.nh.us
Timothy.Lang@leg.state.nh.us
Donovan.Fenton@leg.state.nh.us Suzanne.Prentiss@leg.state.nh.us

Please Submit Group communications or Press Releases to steve@granitegrok.com.
Submission is not a guarantee of publication – Publication is not an endorsement.

Wednesday, January 17th, N.H. House
Education
LOB, Room 205-207

1:00 p.m. – SUPPORT – HB1677
This bill makes Education Freedom Accounts available for all students in failing districts (less than 49% proficiency)
Click here to register your disposition.
 Email the committee

 

Thursday, January 18th, N.H. House
Criminal Justice
LOB, Room 202-204

10:00 a.m. – SUPPORT – HB1012
This bill would ensure parents cannot be found guilty of child endangerment for making a parenting decision that is not otherwise illegal and presents no more than a hypothetical risk of harm. Protect parents’ rights and the ability of children to grow into independence.
Click here to register your disposition.
 Email the committee

 

 

The views and opinions expressed by contributors are those of the author and may not reflect the opinion or position of Grok Media, GraniteGrok.com, its authors, advertisers, donors, or sponsors.

The post Legislative Update Week of Jan. 15, 2024 – END TOWN MASK MANDATES Plus Other Public Hearings appeared first on Granite Grok.

As a courtesy to the folks who don’t feel like jogging digitally to our home page ten times a day, we share content on a handful of platforms throughout the day. Minds, Telegram, MeWe, Gettr, Truth Social, and X. I am pleased to announce that we have added a few more.

I’ve dropped the occasional ‘Grok post on my LinkedIn feed for a few weeks. If you’d like to connect with me on that platform, you can do that here, and then the joy of joys, watch the ‘Grok news, opinion, and the odd bit of bombastic twig-snapping and snowflake-melting outrage present itself for your consideration. There is no team building or marketing, just “professional outreach” from a stable of authors and op-ed writers “regarding” local, national, and global politics.

The ‘Grok has also started adding content to our Signal channel. We’ve had it for years but never utilized it—new plan. I’ve invited the folks I was already connected to, but that list was short because I was not very active there. Now that I am using it for other aspects of my new business model, ‘Grok content will appear 8-10 times daily on Signal.

We’ve also got a very active Telegram chat you can join here.

I aim to reach more readers and make it easier for readers to reach the ‘Grok. We want to increase engagement through debate and hope you’ll find us on those platforms and click through at least a few times daily.

One more. While I can’t share everything, and the censorious bastards are still choking our reach, we are (again) sharing content on the ‘Grok Facebook page. We’d welcome you there as well, though – admittedly – a less inviting and tolerant space than any others. Don’t expect Facebook to feed it to you, however. As I said, we’re still mired in their ideological mud, and they’ve no inclination to let us out.

Gmail

Google Mail blocks ‘Grok’s newsletter. We sent that from our server, so we asked the vendor about what Google had suggested, and they sent us some code. We’re just waiting for the Webmistress to add it as directed. It has been alleged that within 72 hours after the update, there is a chance Gmail users will begin getting our newsletter again, as would other readers using other mail providers who’ve indicated a similar issue.

We will update you when that is done and the grace period has passed.

 

The post Night Cap: You Can Now Get ‘Grokked on Linkedin and Signal + Newsletter/Gmail Issue Update! appeared first on Granite Grok.

According to the two bookends who provided testimony to legislators about the best juridical interests of state judges this week, the legislators can just kick back and skip a resolution to return to Constitutionally defined voting processes in state elections.

Go home and take a pass was the message.

Is it time to abandon judicial political policy-making as court-favored witnesses testified? Should the legislature take a break from their duty, role, and work of establishing public policy and instead allow judges to handle election challenges that define voting process in state elections? De facto, that advice establishes judges as the best determiners of public policy.

Legislators, give yourselves a break. You should let go & go home because the judges got this, was the smiling message delivered with a wink and nod to House Committee members.

Yesterday, two high-level politicos bookended the house hearing and advised legislators to ignore House Resolution No. 25 – designed to thwart the new voting practice allowing anyone to show up on election day to cast a vote without identification, preregistration, or proof of any kind.

This ‘alternative’ to Constitutionally mandated procedures that pre-qualify voters to avoid election fraud is one of many questionable political expansion maneuvers that have been challenged in state and national courts over the last four years. Cynical voters have watched with dismay at the variety of slanted political alterations to states’ voting process and then they sued election officials. (Largely (57 cases nationally) they then lose and are tossed out of court for lack of standing. In New Hampshire, in response to election officials’ alterations of the voting process, a legislative resolution was filed calling for a return to the rules specifically printed in the state constitution. Ergo, this legislative hearing followed on adopting that resolution as a formal statement of public policy as a matter of legislative law/process. (2nd Branch rule.)

Two political advisors (the bookends) argued that legislators (2nd Branch) should skip all the work and disregard voting on a public policy statement. Just let the judges (3rd Branch) handle election voting issues. After all, they said, there are multiple state and federal cases in court concerning election law reform

So why bother yourselves with establishing a public policy resolution that has no clout? No teeth? said first speaker (the Parliamentarian) waving around his old outdated Mason’s Manual as defining authority. Skip it, he advised. Take a pass, he told the resolution committee.

Committee legislators then heard a citizen explanation of a recent U.S. Supreme Court case of Moore v. Harper, (June 2023) which reversed and clarified State duties and clearly defined the duty of states to act and not reject outright claims and complaints of Constitutional fundamental rights regarding election voting rights. The Moore case, taken together with a pair

of earlier Supreme Court 2nd Amendment rights cases, explained Daniel Richard, a Constitutional scholar, to the committee; it establishes a state duty to protect citizens’ fundamental constitutional rights including fundamental election and voter rights to a fair election process The state neglected that duty regarding constitutional questions, he said, and this resolution would recognize it.

The 2nd bookend testimony to the committee was private attorney Bryan Gould, who argued that the courts were the place to handle public policy of this sort (not the legislature) and that Richard’s opinions about the 2nd Amendment cases was “too aggressive” in interpretation — and Richard’s “opinion about a Constitutional duty to protect fundamental rights was in error.” He called the U.S. decision about 2nd Amendment cases “inconsequential” to the election-rights resolution, because the newly clarified Moore v. Harper duty-to-protect was applicable only to 2nd Amendment cases, and not to all fundamental Constitutional challenge cases (1st, 2nd,.5th).

Here, the resolution is about government manipulation of the voting process in violation of the Constitution. It falls into the Heller & Bruen case rulings that STATES bear the burden of proof at trial (not citizens) so an election-process resolution would also be protected by the umbrella of similar Constitutional rights. Gould was wrong when he advised the Committee that “[Richard’s] his opinion is in error” because unlike constitutionally protected gun rights, voting and fair election rights are not required to be fundamentally protected by state law, he said.

With a broad wink, Attorney Gould launched into the narrative of his earlier experiences as the state political fix-it guy for election law cases, bemoaning a federal court LOSS of an earlier voting case on residency and domicile. Gould told the committee that “the greatest legal minds in the state” had “carefully crafted the legislation (of SB 3)” attempting to clarify voter qualifications. (And circumvent the constitution.) They proposed a fancy-schmancy state legislative act to instill a different process for qualifying voters than that process provided in the state constitution. And the federal court struck it down.

What he did not say however was that Mr. Political Fix-It-Man (for the SOS, the State AG, and the State GOP) lost that case that attempted to redefine who was qualified to vote in New Hampshire. [All the while billing the state for valuable attorney time.]

I was so disappointed we lost, he moaned to the committee. [Note: Lesson missed. Try again. More billable hours.]

“Too aggressive,” he said, referring to the prior speaker’s explanation that this resolution fit the Heller & Bruen legal criteria and therefore should be adopted as a statement of public policy. Instead, his message was: ‘State voters seeking fundamental fairness in the election-vote process should leave the issue to the courts, not pass a toothless public policy resolution in the legislature.’ That message was delivered to legislators with a smile, followed by a wink.

Hours before the legislative hearing on Resolution 25, a federal judge tossed out the Testerman election process case. Her challenge of alterations to the GOP political voter registration process

avoided the Constitutional election process. That Constitutional process is a due process mandate.

The judge wrote that Testerman and others had no standing to sue. In other words, the NH SOS can unilaterally extend primary election dates (although specific dates are explicit in the State Constitution) in a way that enables non-party voting (against Trump in 2024) in the GOP primary. [This is a quiet tactical voting scheme of the NH SOS and GOP Party chairman designed and implemented to disrupt 2024 election results.]

Gould was wrong about the law that he advised to the committee — not once, but repeatedly. But he is not stupid. He simply is a tool of a top-tier political agenda, urging and confusing the Committee to leave public policy to the Courts to handle. With flawed case interpretation and his earlier election cases already lost (flawed thinking), this advice to committee members was offered to protect the political “schema” that averts qualified votes into a barrel of monkey results. (The quiet plan was to alter registration deadlines, attached to a campaign for a significant number of Democrats to change to undeclared party status, then to use/ask for a Republican ballot on Primary Day to keep Donald Trump’s name off the fall election ballot. Then to use their undeclared status to vote in the general election, where they are not prevented from voting.

The tactical voting scheme goes much deeper than that. It is also a challenge of power about which branch of government should decide public policy – the legislature or court?

The process of extending and encouraging non-party voting in a party primary is called “a tactile voting process interruption.”

By design, it renders election-day voting a politically manipulated outcome. It violates State Constitutional mandates for election registration and process. It is also alleged to be an act of RICO.

The area of Election Day voting abuse by public officials has been drastically reshaped by court decisions across the country –designed in law theory and practice to deny injured parties “standing to sue” with no other relief available. Injury without relief. Judges have callously advanced a no-recourse solution as ‘take your problem to the voters’ because judges systematically disallow (reject) election challenge lawsuits. This is not the first time in our nation’s history that the court has expanded political power to take over the role of the legislature.

Can courts convert state election policy and constitutionally mandated voting practices by avoiding hearing these cases? What if the effect is –to politically “expand voting rights to anyone” by using court rulings (or denial of standing) for all election-challenge cases? Can they control the outcome of the election?

This take-over of function encroaches on the legislature’s role in creating public policy, and it circumvents the American Constitutional system. The result is to neuter or ‘amend’ the Constitution by judges’ practices, but not by operation of law. 1925 to 1930 saw multiple jurists and legal scholars work to reinterpret the Constitution using “a crude version of Marxism to reinterpret the Court’s decisions…” (see Gustavus Myers’ book, History of the Supreme Court of the United States, and James Smith’s book, The Growth and Decadence of Constitutional Government).

Court-packing and judicial activism are considered blatant political aggressions viewed through the different lense of political scientists. The difference is political scientists are more likely to regard judicial activism as “a perversion of the democratic process” and not a legal operation under the Constitution and rule of law. [See Wallace Mendelson’s book, Justice Black and Frankfurter: Conflict on the Court.]

By systematically avoiding legal challenges and as in the present situation–by politically encouraging legislators to skip the bother of a frivolous election-rights resolution [because judges have election challenge cases in hand]—it sidesteps the underlying agenda to defeat democratic rule. ‘

The judges have got this, you don’t have to’ is the message. It’s the same “Trust us” message Clerk of Court Howard Zibel told legislators mere days before the NH House Subcommittee voted for a full impeachment investigation about decades-old court cronyism and corruption. You can trust the judges. This historic refrain echoed yet again in the state legislative committee room this week.

Submitted by Caroline Douglas, J.D.
Former New Hampshire legislative bill drafter
Former NH attorney
Legal Analyst and Author of The Dark Side, a law treatise on judging National whistleblower and skeptic
Contact: nssri@pm.me

The views and opinions expressed by contributors are those of the author and may not reflect the opinion or position of Grok Media, GraniteGrok.com, its authors, advertisers, donors, or sponsors.

The post NH House Resolution No. 25: Is it Time to Question Judicial Policymaking appeared first on Granite Grok.

Check out the recent clips of Joe Biden “campaigning.” Biden, OBVIOUSLY, cannot even dress himself. Yet the people who control the information continue the charade that Biden is running the executive branch of the federal government.

THIS is why “they” … the system, the UniParty, whatever you want to call it … HATE Elon Musk and X so much. Essentially, Musk and X allow those who are interested in and willing to see it to see the Matrix that our “democracy” actually is.

But count on “traditional Republicans” to keep telling us that the most important issues we face are cutting business taxes, billionaire taxes, and eviscerating local zoning laws. “Traditional Republicans” … Nikki Haley, Chris Sununu, Mitch McConnell … are every bit as invested in perpetuating the Matrix as their frenemies on the Left.

NEW: Bike store owner talks to President Joe Biden like a nursing home patient and has to put his hand in front of him to stop him from walking.

Meanwhile, Democrats think this man has another 5 years in the tank.

During the same outing, Biden told a group of people that he… pic.twitter.com/bFqssb2fgd

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) January 12, 2024

A lost and confused Grandpa Joe has to be spoken to like a five-year-old.

This is the same person making unilateral decisions to wage war.pic.twitter.com/wNrCeSvAoo

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) January 12, 2024

WATCH: Joe Biden makes teenage girl visibly uncomfortable as she squirms away from him when he starts creepily whispering in her ear pic.twitter.com/WZ3840WDUP

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) January 12, 2024

Joe Biden visits a coffee shop and doesn't remember where he is or that he's the President.

"My name's Joe Biden. I work for the government in the Senate."

This is terrifying. pic.twitter.com/nCNqx83ww3

— Grand Old Patriots (@GrandOlPatriots) January 12, 2024

Media: Joe Biden does not make children physically uncomfortable

Joe Biden: pic.twitter.com/arqET32ayP

— DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) January 12, 2024

 

The post When The Amphetamines Wear Off appeared first on Granite Grok.