Wednesday • April 15 • 2026
Vol.XVIII • No.XVI
Manchester, N.H.
Just this:
(This works because I’m finalizing this post on Sunday.)
Take heart – there will be both a Wednesday and Friday Edition. Last week’s Friday Edition.
Remember, ridicule and mockery are effective weapons:
Now, let the mockery and mayhem begin.
*** Warning, a few possibly off-color ones, in case tender eyes are about ***
>>>>>=====<<<<<
This is one reason I have truly started to hate the ADL. The sentiment by that professor is not just not a Jewish one – no Shul I’ve ever been in has ever discussed, let alone promoted such that I’ve ever heard – but many on the Left DO hold this idea of eliminating whites. The problem is that the ADL races to defend Jews even when they have said / done the indefensible.
I do understand the desire to “circle the wagons”. Every group does this to some degree. But, like comedian Evan Sayet observed, Plopping Jews have their real faith being liberalism. The ADL also promotes mass migration and sexual deviancy.
I’d pay good money to see that happen.
Howard Zinn is a commie. He’s poisoned all sorts of minds over the years. Here’s a counter to that:
Debunking Howard Zinn: Exposing the Fake History That Turned a Generation against America
I may have told this anecdote before… when my mother was alive I’d visit for a couple of days here and here, and one day we were both listening to some absolute-drivel NPR show. 30 minutes of – as she’d put it – drek. At the end of it she asked me how they could put such on the radio, and I replied that they didn’t make it for people like us. They made it for their fellows in the media, and all their uber-liberal friends, and for the applause at the cocktail parties of how brave and edgy they were.
They were NOT “noble savages”, that’s for sure.
Taboo Truths About the Comanche | Frontpage Mag
Indigenous Slavers: American Indians Who Whipped and Owned Blacks | Frontpage Mag
As with so many things, why on earth would someone vote against this? What possible innocent rationale could someone have against telling people what’s in their food?
Terrorist billionaires and the future of food – American Thinker
Democrats Block Amendment to Require Informing People if They’re Eating Bugs (infowars.com)
Related to the war on food in general:
Proposed EPA Rule Shuts Down Small Meat Producers | American Stewards
Not helplessly. Hopelessly. Screaming at the people repeating history that doom is coming, only to watch those idiots head straight for the cliff.
>>>>>=====<<<<<
PSA – PSA – PSA – PSA – PSA
I’ll be the first person to admit that my “green thumb” is, well, only kind of green. It doesn’t help that my soil is a few inches over gravel fill, and crap soil to boot. Still, I’m gearing up for planting at least something – just cleared out my one 4 X 8 raised bed and hoping next weekend is “stable” enough I can start planting. Mostly herbs and a bunch of garlic. Did I mention I love garlic before?
Now, can I feed my family off that? Not even close. But… it’s a start, and it’s hopefully implanting an attitude into my kids as well. Already set potatoes in sunlight to get them sprouting. The plan is 8 five-gallon buckets for potatoes. Plus 3-4 things of cherry tomatoes (always better luck than with regular sized ones). And some beans.
Soon the local farmers markets will start up. Patronize them. Buy local whenever you can – not necessarily for cost, because my experience is that it’s not necessarily a savings to do so. Buy like your food supply depends on that, because it does. In a few weeks I’ll be compiling and posting a listing of NH farmers markets. Please help me by commenting below on such markets in your area. Not just for vegetables, but also local meats.
I do regularly go to the Nashua farmer’s market and need to keep an eye out for when they open for the season. One year I stumbled on one in Merrimack but it seems spotty at best (didn’t see it the last couple of years). Any other ones I should know of? Again, I’ll compile a list.
*** I am looking for some classes to make sausage and cure it for no-refrigeration storage, as well as someone who knows how to set up a pressure canner as I’m stumped. Classes in that, home canning, would be ideal. ***
One last thing on this, at least for now: make sure you tell those farmers that you’re doing this knowingly and deliberately. They need to not just see your money coming in, but your words of support.
>>>>>=====<<<<<
Why? To avoid upsetting their new voting demographic.
People who fail to connect consequences to their actions – in this case, their advocacy – are among the most dangerous in the world.
As with food in bugs… WHY would someone turn this down? And if they did do it with malice aforethought, they had to have been “in” on things to at least some degree. Which speaks, IMHO, to the visceral hate they have for Trump and MAGA that they’re willing to put people at risk like this. Then again… see just below on what Commies are willing to do to advance Communism.
Victims of Communism | Keep the flame of liberty alive
Israel LEFT Gaza in 2005; the blockade – something always very expensive to do – was only implemented in 2008 (I think). What could possibly have happened that Israel might have decided to do that?
Exactly right.
>>>>>=====<<<<<
Link section (some mine, some from my Jarhead friend):
The DOJ, FBI, and the ATF have been busy rewriting the “rules” regarding “engaged in the business” of firearms sales. As a result, they are about to launch a massive effort to throttle our 2nd Amendment rights. This is a fairly long read but goes into good detail about how they have weasel-worded the rules so they can target pretty much ANYONE they want to, and then point to the rules that make it legal. Note that this was NOT voted on by Congress, it’s just an arbitrary change by unelected bureaucrats.:
Biden/Garland Target Political Opposition with “Terrorism”: DOJ Publishes New Rule to Update Definition of “Engaged in the Business” as a Firearms Dealer – POLITICAL MOONSHINE
—
T.L. Davis with another very thought provoking article. Right now, if you jump the border, you get a phone, debit cards, medical care, food stamps, and all kinds of other “bennies” which are provided by the US Government (really the taxpayers). If Trump manages to outwit and outflank all the issues & landmines laid for him and actually win (we hope), all the Deep State has to do is shut off the “free money” spigot by not refilling the debit cards & denying food stamps. Once the “bennies” currently going to all the illegal aliens (invaders, really) gets cut off, millions will be rioting, looting, and stealing within days. And if armed citizens fight them off, well, we’ll just declare martial law and take the guns. It’s just another way to undermine America:
Words Aren’t Enough – by T.L. Davis (substack.com)
—
26 Barges Break Loose Causing Bridge Closures and Damage on Ohio River – Vigilant News Network
What are the odds all these things are suddenly happening so quickly?
—
Even the DEMS don’t like Biden’s rules on tailpipe emissions:
Biden Administration Rebuked By Senate On Car Emissions – Victory Girls Blog
—
The 10 Stages of mRNA Denial – Vigilant News Network
Bird Flu Vaccine for Humans ‘Ready for Mass Production’ – Vigilant News Network
Start fortifying yourself with Vitamin C and D, zinc, quercetin, etc.
—
I’m not a fan of Bill Maher, but this monolog is spot on:
https://twitter.com/VigilantFox/status/1773916265138016505
—
Moonbattery in Maine: Last year they passed a “feel good” bill making it illegal to do business with companies affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). But on April 10th, they STOPPED a bill that would help shut down the 100’s of illegal pot farms that are already operating in Maine (run by Chinese illegals at the behest of the CCP), and also help to prevent new ones from starting. The CCP has been creating this illegal farms all over Maine, and the Federal authorities won’t do anything to stop them (wonder who they REALLY work for?). This bill would have given some real teeth to the local law enforcement, so of course it was killed:
Maine Lawmakers Reject Bill That Targets China-Run Marijuana Farms | The Epoch Times
—
Double standards on display: The DOJ is ignoring Congressional subpoenas, after putting Peter Navarro in jail for not responding to a Congressional subpoena:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/judge-berates-doj-for-defying-congressional-subpoenas-5623170
—
Not surprising, but it looks like many of Trumps enemies are being funded by George Soros and his ilk:
https://twitter.com/pepesgrandma/status/1778475118278361348
—
For those who think the coming war will be “fun” or “easy”, or something they can watch on the 6pm news, Aesop has some comments on that:
Raconteur Report: Once More, With Feeling
—
David Hogg gets schooled by a lady who grew up in communist China:
The Feral Irishman: Meanwhile, At Dartmouth College, A Chinese Immigrant Schools A Useful Idiot….
I’ve met Lily. I’ve got to send a campaign contribution in this week.
—
A good article that takes a realistic look at prepping for long term survival. The gist is this: Unless you have VERY deep pockets, and can afford a bug out place in a remote location (and a means to get there that avoids the roads, like a helicopter), the realistic “survival” time is measures in days for those in cities, weeks for suburbia, and months in rural locations. Remember, it’s not just criminals who want your preps, it’s EVERYBODY who didn’t prep enough (plus the government). And as the days go on, more desperate people will be added to that “didn’t prep enough” list. Are you prepared to fight off a horde of 20? of 50? What if the Sheriff shows up with 10 “deputized” men and demands you turn over all your supplies? Or an Army National Guard unit? Anyway, read it and start re-thinking your plans:
https://bayourenaissanceman.blogspot.com/2024/04/emergency-preparations-dont-fool.html
Related:
“Getting Close To Post Time” – Liberty’s Torch (libertystorch.info)
—
The dollar is under attack by many forces; the BRICS nations want to kill it, inflation is eating up your dollars daily, and our own government keeps spending money we don’t have. When the system crashes (by design mind you, this has been orchestrated for decades), people will be using $100 bills as fire-starter. Got gold & silver?:
https://watcher.guru/news/brics-us-economist-anticipates-bankruptcy-market-crash
The problem – especially at this late hour – is to buy gold and silver with no paper / electronic trail. You can bet your bottom dollar that all those companies selling “physical gold and silver” will have their records confiscated first thing.
—
The Communist Party’s 45 Goals For America CAME TRUE | Isabel Brown LIVE (rumble.com)
Just… wow.
—
The Girl Who Hugged Trump In Atlanta Is a Treasure – HotAir
OOH, Trump is apparently gaining with blacks and others. OTOH, do not doubt the DS and its vote fraud machine.
—
The Daily Chart: Bidenflation by the Numbers | Power Line (powerlineblog.com)
Damning charts.
Joe Did That: Inflation Costs Americans an Extra $1K Monthly – PJ Media
—
As Iran readies to attack Israel, remember this is Biden’s design (nypost.com)
Remember, Iran considers America the GREAT SATAN. And that, in Shia Islam, their version of the messiah cannot come until there is a world war. To them, WW3 is not a bug but a feature.
While I do sympathize with those who say “Not our problem”, and it is tempting to think this, there is a problem: Iran wants to make it your problem. More to the point, feeding Israel to the Islamists will simply stimulate their thirst to take on the West in general; after all, the West fed Hitler the Sudetenland, and that didn’t stop Hitler one big. Appeasement never works.
—
Insurers Spy On Houses Via Aerial Imagery, Seeking Reasons To Cancel Coverage | ZeroHedge
IMHO, yet another way to force people from their homes and into permanent rentals as they can’t afford homes any more.
—
Remember: The climate data foisted on us by NOAA is based 30% on nonexistent weather stations – Behind The Black – Robert Zimmerman
Doesn’t matter. Belief in “Climate Change” is now the religion for those who think they’re too smart to believe in religion.
—
The Intelligence Community Exists To Spy On Americans (thefederalist.com)
At this point I can’t disagree with this. Related:
Thomas Massie Reveals Disgusting Carveout Congressional Members Gave Themselves in National Security Bill – The Politics Brief
“Congress gives itself a carve out in the reauthorization of FISA 702 warrantless spying on Americans,” Massie said. “The bill requires the FBI to notify and seek consent from Congress before violating the privacy of Congressmen.”
—
Sri Lankans stop repeal of ‘anti-gay’ laws despite UN pressure (massresistance.org)
A victory!
>>>>>=====<<<<<
Pick of the post:
Oh, damn that’s the best one of the lot, by far. Those, and those who say Oh, that’s just not possible. (Or That can’t happen here.)
>>>>>=====<<<<<
Palate Cleansers:
—
—
>>>>>=====<<<<<
Come back Wednesday for another edition. Same Meme Time. Same Meme channel.
Please do consider buying me a coffee.
Buy Me a Coffee
Thanks to John who bought me a whopping 10 coffees!
>>>>>=====<<<<<
See all my Jab-related cartoons here.
The post MONDAY MEMES appeared first on Granite Grok.
Now comes the Appellant Daniel Richard pro se. hereby “objects’ to the reopening of the case in the above-named and numbered Supreme Court case, after the honorable court has closed arguments.
Plaintiff submits it would be fundamentally unfair and a deprivation of plaintiff’s fundamental due process rights for the court to take this unsolicited and extraordinary measure that will unfairly allow the defendants to have a second bite of the apple.
Plaintiff submits; the court was aware during the Supreme Court hearing of November 29, 2023, that his Appeal and ‘complaint’ contain allegations of a constitutional nature, where the plaintiff alleges a denial of constitutional voting rights; that said rights were cited within his complaint; that the plaintiff had an obvious personal stake in the case, and that the plaintiff alleged actual bias and harm caused as a result of said constitutional deprivation.
However well intended, this Court’s solicitation of a brief from the defendants and from friends of the court at this point in the appellate proceeding is extraordinary and appears to try to do by soliciting outside non-parties to what the state has twice declined to do, viz: raise standing in the state answer or in the state’s oral argument. The state’s reasons for not addressing this preliminary issue may be political or it may reflect personal liability of state actors, falling outside the umbrella of indemnity or immunity. Regardless, Appellant suggests it is improper for this unilateral expansion of briefing to outside parties by the highest court judges during appeal when it was not briefed by the state and therefore conceded at the trial court level appears unprecedented as to both activism and bias in the form of by discrimination.
Further, it appears to suggest state actors protecting other state actors by abuse of authority and highly questionable judicial activism to alter some element, presently known or unknown. Because elections are time sensitive, this further delay of a final state decision during an important Presidential election year, further operates to disadvantage Appellant alone. Meanwhile, the State Legislature and various top ranking state politicians have been actively working to “cement” illegal and unconstitutional voting machine voting and counting, and other unreliable election change-processes as “a done deal.’ Putting aside for the moment the millions of dollars of financial incentives involved in this “new” voting machine acquisition, and notwithstanding multiple irregularities already demonstrated in fraudulent computerized tabulating and counting indicating a lack of reliability in state machines, both past (2008) and those sitting in corporate warehouses waiting to be delivered around the state.
This delay and political actor and corporate activism is avoiding statutory reliance procedures. One of those, reliability testing, has a manmade loophole that with an “extension” (based on insider agreements between public officials and private corporations) means independent machine reliability testing can be postponed years beyond the 2024 election. This legislative political manipulation during the pendency of this case and appeal represents benefit to the tune of millions of dollars should this alternate machine-testing “agreement’ be successful.
Meanwhile, the top court is now initiating what appears to be an improper changing of Supreme Court rules for outside briefs on an issue the Plaintiffs briefed and argued below, but the State Defendants did not, even when raised by the lower court magistrate for them.
Placing in controversy Supreme Court Rule 16 with the following, this Courts order states that any replies to the Court’s solicitation must meet the requirements of Rule 16, such an order is contrary and repugnant to this Courts own rule 16 and Rule 30 which prohibits such a late solicitation and it is contrary to this Court’s own precedent on solicitation of Amicus Curiae during the preliminary stages of the Appeal. This Courts solicitation of an Amicus Brief at this time (post oral arguments) violates N.H. Supreme Court Rule 16(7):
“thecourt shall not consider any brief or memorandum of law after a case has
been argued or submitted, unless the court has granted to the party offering to file
the brief or memorandum of law special leave to do so in advance.”
This has not been done. Pursuant to Rule 16, an amicus curiae brief may be filed only with leave of court by interested parties, but moreover, an amicus brief must be limited to issues raised on appeal by the parties.
Plaintiff strongly suggests, this Amicus Brief solicitation cannot now be used to bail out city and state governments, as it was not briefed by the defendants on appeal. The amicus brief cannot now be used to allow a third party to brief standing when the defendants failed to do so themselves, and the respected members of this Supreme court should not allow such an unfair supplemental action against a pro se defendant.
This Court’s call to open an argument of standing with an Amicus Brief solicitation is un-timely and un-fair and suggests improper bias when top judges untimely initiate sua sponte such an order. Amicus Briefs submission is permitted under N.H. Supreme Court Rule (16) and Rule 30(1). Such practice is use in Federal Courts and many other states, during a court’s initial consideration of a case on the merits and not thereafter. This un-timely solicitation of amicus brief by this Court at this time and manner deprives Appellant of his substantive and procedural due process rights, and or the ability to consent to, or to object to, or to reply to any amicus brief filed in the manner provided for by said Court rules of procedure.
There is no prior Appellee motion for special leave of the court filed in advance for permission to file an amicus brief after oral arguments, therefore, under Rule 16(7) no brief or memorandum of law is now admissible in this instant case pursuant to this Court’s own rules.
The Courts use of an order soliciting an Amicus Brief is rare, and in this case, it is extraordinary in its timing, contrary to past precedent of this Court, presents an appearance of state discrimination against a pro se, and violates the Appellant’s Due Process Rights.
The precedent on the use of Amicus Brief solicitation was limited, and it was last used in case # 2022-0114, S.D. v. N.B. on September 20, 2022, (response due Oct. 21. 2022) which was filed well in advance of the submission of that case for consideration before this Court on January 25, 2023 allowing the parties to object to, or consent to, any amicus brief. This precedent does not support this Court present use of an Amicus Brief Solicitation after the time allowed the rules of this Court in effect in this case. Only one side benefits from such a legal maneuver. It is not the Appellant.
At oral arguments the Defendants raised the issue of standing in their oral arguments and spent three and a half minutes arguing why they did not brief the issue of standing, un-convincingly. If the Defendants oral arguments on standing were convincing, and the Court wished to give the Defendant a second bite at the apple, the Court should have done so immediately following oral arguments, not 4 months later. This Court solicitation for an amicus curie brief from the public will now allow a 3rd party to brief standing when defendants failed to do so.
Chief Justice Gordon MacDonald stated in oral arguments that trial court deferred standing, and that the trial court assumed standing. The trial court established standing by rendering its 16-page opinion, otherwise if there was no standing the trial Judge should have dismissed the case for lack of standing, which he did not do. If an error at law, this error by trial court over standing is now being raised by this higher Court and not by the Defendants who chose not to brief standing on appeal.
Defendants state on pg. 1 of their motion to dismiss and pg. 2 item 6, 7, 59, 60, 61, 63, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 73, 75, 76, 77, Oct. 3, 2022, that the appellant for lack of Standing, “and move to dismiss the complaint in this matter on the grounds of standing” … The Defendants having briefed the issue of standing in lower court, by making the legal decision to not brief standing for a reason. There is some thinking that failure to give a reason and failure to argue standing relates to a political question of whether or not the state actors will lose or not be covered by state immunity for their action’s ultra vires. Under Superior Court rules failure to answer or deny is an issue, is admitted as true. That is not the absence of legal thinking, but the affirmative decision to avoid or ignore or waive the standing issue.
Therefore, the Appellant respectfully moves for the court to sustain Plaintiff’s objection against reopening the case to additional briefs for standing by the parties and that no out-side parties amicus curie brief be permitted into the record, and for the Court render its opinion on this case as briefed.
CERTIFICATION
I, Daniel Richard, do hereby swear that on April 14, 2024, I did deliver through the state court web site a copy of this to Christopher T. Sununu, et al.
Dated April 14, 2024
VERIFACTION
I, Daniel Richard, certify that the foregoing facts to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Daniel Richard
/s/ Daniel Richard
The post Daniel Richard v. Christopher Sununu, et al: Pro SE Plaintiff’s “Objection” To Reopen the Case… appeared first on Granite Grok.
