By Wendi Strauch Mahoney, UncoverDC: New Testimony Confirms Ballot Tampering in Maricopa’s 2022 Election New testimony from Bob Hughes confirms ballot tampering in Maricopa County’s 2022 election. Hughes states in his affidavit that “an intentional change was made to the... Tom Bowler

They’re flying so thick and fast it is amazing.  Take heart – there will be a Meme Overflow and almost certainly a Friday Meme Overflow-Overflow.  Last week’s Overflow.

Remember, ridicule and mockery are effective weapons:

1. Ridicule cannot easily be fought
2. Ridicule makes the enemy angry, and angry people make mistakes
3. For those in the “squishy middle” a Thought Splinter (and Part II and Part III and Part IV) can often be hidden inside humor.

Now, let the mockery and mayhem begin.  Still somewhat pressed for time but a full post today.

 

*** Warning, a few possibly off-color ones, in case tender eyes are about ***

 

 

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

Reap the Whirlwind

 

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

 

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

 

He seems nice.

Not.

Remember, these are the same ilk who said:

 

 

And who now say things like this:

 

 

“Cristcucks”.  Dehumanization of the enemy.  You think you can coexist with these people?  Make plans.  They are.

 

 

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

 

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

I know nothing more worthy of a man’s ambition than that his son be the best of men.

Plato

 

Interesting timing.  My son is studying martial arts, in the same art where I got up to my brown belt before I wrecked my knees.  He asked “What happens if I get to black belt – will you be mad that I passed you”?  I told him no.  A sign of a great parent is that they hope their children exceed them.

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

 

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

 

Yeah, we’ll get them in 2024.  Uh huh.

TINVOWOOT.

 

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

Pick of the post:

 

 

Excellent point.  And it brings back this classic question:

 

 

I simply do not grasp how my fellow Jews fall onto the gun-control side of this.  But JPFO does have an interesting take on that, and it rings true:

The Shtetl Mentality (jpfo.org)

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

 

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

Palate Cleansers:

 

—

—

 

 

The post MONDAY MEMES appeared first on Granite Grok.

Well, last week I said, “this is going to be a slog – slow and steady for both of us”.  Well, for me, yeah, for sure – slow and steady.  But Tom, as you can see below, had a great week compared to the earlier three. If he keeps this up, I’m in trouble. After all, it’s the old 80/20 Rule for me (or so it seems).  Eighty percent to get done only needs 20% of the effort. It’s that last 20% that takes that 80% of the effort, blood, sweat, and in this case, hunger. My “2nd” easy weight, I think, is now gone. Tom, however, seems to be getting on a roll!

I’ve had a mantra for years: “everything in moderation including moderation”. Unfortunately for me, and great for Tom, is that after a long absence, I had an urge for a chili dog. Hey, what can just one chili dog do, right (think the old Pringles’ jingle)? Kayem Ballpark hot dog (very mild), diced Vidalia onion, a thin line of French’s mustard, and a great hot do roll. Toast the bun with a slight schmear of butter on each side, medium grilling, and pan fry the hot dog until it gets a really crispy brownish skin on it.  And D.L. Jardine’s Texas Chili mix

(“Try one teaspoon [red pepper] for chili that is ‘hotter than a two dollar pistol on Saturday night. If you want your Texas Chili even hotter, keep pouring and may the good Lord help you. Watch for the smoke and fallout”)

Yeah, more than a couple this week. And I have 3 more bowls of chili in the freezer.  Pray for me that I can overcome this temptation (the recipe for the chile need two pounds of hamburg so there’s too much sitting there, just chortling at me.  When Tom reads this, he’s going to laugh at me!

this is going to be a slog – slow and steady for both of us

 

sadf

 

asdf

The post The Skip & Tom Weight Challenge – Week 4 appeared first on Granite Grok.

The history of Democrats violating campaign finance laws is long and heady and includes paying off women to keep quiet about illicit liaisons. Trump’s problem is that he is not a Democrat, so requesting the charges be dismissed will be on the table Tuesday for his arrest and arraignment.

But imagine if all he had to do was to say he was switching parties. Democrats rarely get more than a fine for illegal electioneering or campaign finance indiscretions. And while whatever they’ve charged Trump with may be too old to be actionable (he didn’t spend millions on a fake dossier to undermine a candidate or a presidency illegally), if he was on Team Blue, you have to wonder. Would dismissal be a foregone conclusion?

Is it anyway?

Democrats hold so much anger and resentment that there is little The Donald could do to please them except perhaps kill himself. And while setting him up for a perp walk in Manhattan reeks of opportunity for would-be assassins, he’ll have secret service protection (assuming we can still trust them to do their jobs, which we can’t). Will the Judge make this go away on day one, or did they (the left) get the Judge they wanted?

A book deal, cable news show, or is it – we’ll kill your family if you don’t do what we say, or maybe, here’s a beautiful Dacaha in Ukraine for after the war. Comrade Volinskyy says he will perform some comedy for your entertainment.

Is any of that beyond the pale at this point?

We are witnessing another full-on political persecution with the blessing of the folks tasked with ensuring justice in an increasingly two-tiered system.

Theirs and yours. It’s sad but also embarrassing, which got me thinking. Given how ridiculous this is, I wondered what the sealed Alvin Bragg indictment looks like.

Something a toddler crafted on manilla construction paper with oversized crayons.

Or maybe a blank piece of paper Bragg can fill in as his mood suits.

 

The post If We Had a Sneak Peak at Alvin Bragg’s Sealed Trump Indictment (And Other Thoughts on Tomorrow) appeared first on Granite Grok.

When colleges and universities start offering courses like this, it isn’t about academic rigor, the striving for newer (and useful) knowledge. This is pandering in a pale (and useless) effort under the rubric of “transforming the world.”

Sorry, this is just out-and-out lame for the weak-minded that can’t do the math. Organic Chemistry would be like climbing Mt. Everest backwards for these underachievers that still want a “degree.”

You know what?  These are the types of skulls full of nothing (quoting Rush with “skulls full of mush” would be too kind) wanting a diploma that Mom and Dad’s money is making a diploma worthless (emphasis mine)

University of Maryland Now Offering Minor in ‘Protest Art’
“Students in this interdisciplinary minor learn how artists and designers can play a vital role in advancing public dialogue”

Students can now minor in “Creative Placemaking” starting this next semester at the University of Maryland.

“Students in this interdisciplinary minor learn how artists and designers can play a vital role in advancing public dialogue,” and will “[explore] our shared humanity and [while] addressing some of our major challenges,” according to the art department’s website. The new minor will help enrollees spark “conversations about racial injustice, inequitable development, climate change or celebrating the diverse communities and cultures around us.”

Starting to sound like a theological school of Woke to me.  Swap out the Bible (heck, many Protestant mainline denominations have already done that), change the traditional sacraments and rituals, come up with new “hymnals” for protesting choirs, and there you go. The way it’s going, I would not be surprised to see a M.S. | Ph.D in Woke Divinity (where divinity is now redefined that WE are the god we worship anew) coming out of this.

To ask the question is to know the answer: and can you determine which Bible will be in use?  “Traditional Values” or the “Progressive Obama Transformation of America” one?

Think Constitutional Conservatives would be welcome in the pews of this Church?

…“Coined by the National Endowment for the Arts in 2010, ‘creative placemaking’ is the collaboration of artists and designers with local residents and stakeholders to address community challenges and opportunities,” the media team wrote in its email. “Navigating the process with students allows them to practice the essential relationship-building, dialogue and collaborative decision-making involved in addressing a community’s needs and aspirations.”

Students in the program “will learn how to employ techniques like mural design, storytelling, pop-up installations, public events and performance to advance a community’s vision and nurture vibrant place” and “will engage in place-based art and design projects in partnership with local organizations, knowledge keepers, and artists in select areas of Maryland, including the Purple Line Corridor.”

No, someone like me (lack of artistic capability aside) would never be welcome there. In fact, I would be labeled a heathen, a heretic, or someone to be burnt at the stake immediately.  But I will say, keeping in mind the words of Andrew Breitbart, “politics is downstream of culture,” that the Right had better come up with a better offering as this is just yet another effort by the Left to solidify its grasp on the Culture that now surrounds us.

The phrase used to be “The dumbing down of America.” This is the next illogical step: consider this part of the “Un-education of America”. Afterall,

(H/T: Legal Insurrection)

The post The New Woke College Version of Ye Olde “Underwater Basketweaving” – What’s Next, a Major in ‘Peaceful Protesting’? appeared first on Granite Grok.

By Rick Moran, PJ Media: Federal Judges Are Refusing to Hire Stanford Law Grads as Clerks Judge James C. Ho of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit made news last year when he announced during a speech... Tom Bowler

The Truth Ministers at the Comrade Broadcasting System (CBS) have issued a media fatwa. Thou shalt not use the word ‘transgender’ when reporting on the carbon-based life form that shuffled off the mortal coils of six (including three children) at a Christian School.

Call Aiden (Audrey) Hale what you like, just not transgender. It makes no difference that Audrey was proud to be trans or that this may be relevant to the shooting (as in, it’s one of those hate crime things).

 

Hale left behind a “manifesto” and had studied the school and its entrance points, according to police. Hale was getting treatment for an unspecified “emotional disorder,” said Metro Police Chief John Drake.  The shooter’s parents thought Hale had recently sold his only gun, but Hale had in fact legally purchased seven firearms from five different local gun shops, Drake said.

Was Hale a bit unhinged? Is this where the red flag folks say, “see, protective orders!”? Except that the same lot would probably call it a hate crime to request one on a guy who thinks he’s a woman. Discrimination! Bigot!

I’m not sure if CBS has any thoughts on that, but according to the NY Post, staffers had unhappy thoughts about the Fatwa passed down by their Media Mullahs.

 

“This is absurd because the police identified Hale as transgender,” a CBS insider said. “If the cops didn’t address it, maybe you could avoid it, but withholding information is not journalism.” …

The Tuesday call with the CBS News execs left the network’s roughly 150 staffers stunned into awkward silence, according to a source who was on the call.

The source noted that the two CBS News execs appeared to be “twisting themselves in knots” by censoring the reporting over their own “liberal bias,” which is ultimately a “disservice” to the network’s audience.

Well, that opens up some possibilities.

• Were you all opposed to CBS News airing footage from a crowded Italian Hospital (during COVID) as if it were an overwhelmed New York City Hospital (while anecdotal evidence suggested they were not even busy)?
• You’re good with all the years of breathless fainting spells over every lie Democrats fed you about Donald Trump that was reported as fact without batting an eye or doing any actual research?
• Are there any past selective-editing controversies you’d like to revisit?
• No takebacks on Covington kid Nick Sandmann or Christine Blasey Ford’s false testimony (or any of the Judge Kavanaugh smear)?
• Michale Brown never said, “Hands up, don’t shoot.”
• Trayvon Martin (not a child) assaulted George Zimmerman (who was not a light-skinned Hispanic).
• Then there were the mostly peaceful protests (arson, assault, theft, murder), and since it was the same season, just about everything regarding COVID, you aped without blinking.
• Declaring war on and then occupying Law Enforcement and federal buildings was not an insurrection, but people touring the US Capitol is?
• Is Anyone rethinking the coverage of the Pulse Nightclub shooting in Orlando and registered Democrat Omar Mateen?
• Kyle Rittenhouse.
• What about all the attacks you and your media pals tried to blame on the Tea Party or some faction of the political right that were committed by lefties, Islamists, or undeclared with liberal leanings?

Don’t get me wrong. I like the idea that there are staffers barfed out of progressive modern J Schools inside CBS that think omitting “Transgender” from the reporting on “Audrey’s” mass murder is unethical. I don’t buy it.

There’s also this unpleasant fact. Transgenders and their political and media advocates get winded complaining about how the trans community needs to be accepted by the culture. Disregarding that we are talking about people incapable of accepting themselves for who they are, where’s the pride? These brave trendsetting glass-ceiling breakers get a special mention until one of them shoots up a Christian School. Then they are just a shooter.

Does anyone recall the attempted mass shooting by Floyd Corkins II?

And – most importantly – do they plan to apply this new policy to adjectives that would have described other shooters or just those that might lean left politically?

 

The post CBS Bans the Word ‘Transgender’ in Any Reporting on Christian School Shooter Aiden (Audrey) Hale appeared first on Granite Grok.

After finding out that the Raymond school district was tracking children with digital badges, it appears as if they are going to go forward with this PBIS program. This time it looks like they will at least follow the law. They’ve been using the digital badges for a while now, but the administrators did not follow state regulations on digital tracking devices. You can read more about that here.

As I reported, this is government surveillance that includes the sharing of personal information with a 3rd party vendor.

There are no real privacy protections in place to secure the data because in December 2011, the U.S. Department of Education changed the regulations governing the release of student data to the private sector. President Obama did this without Congressional authorization.

Ed Tech vendors have profited since then by keeping parents in the dark when they mine their child’s data. Administrators have been too lazy or unwilling to protect the privacy of your children too. School administrators could be notifying parents about the potential to data-mine your child’s personal information without a law in place. Prior to 2011, school officials would have had to notify and receive consent by parents and guardians in order to use these kinds of software programs in the school.

All of this data mining by vendors and other outside sources, violate the The New Hampshire Constitution:
An individual’s right to live free from governmental intrusion in private or personal information is natural, essential, and inherent. It may take someone  willing to sue the schools to settle this in court.

The privacy policies tech vendors use, do not protect your child’s data. Instead they exploit the loophole in the federal student privacy law (FERPA). If you read the privacy policies that are supposed to protect your child’s data, because they follow the FERPA law, you assume that the tech vendor protects the student’s privacy. But there are now exceptions to which schools and vendors can share your child’s personal data without your knowledge or consent. The privacy policies are not private.

 New Hampshire law RSA 189:68-II requires school districts to do the following when using digital badges in schools:

II. No school shall require a student to use an identification device that uses radio frequency identification, or similar technology, to identify the student, transmit information regarding the student, or monitor or track the student without approval of the school board, after a public hearing, and without the written consent of a parent of legal guardian of an affected student which may be withheld without consequence. 

Why wouldn’t parents want this type of digital tracking devices on their children? There are many reasons including the data mining of information on their children by the tech vendor. In addition to their right to live free from government intrusion, this type of device grooms children into thinking that they should be monitored at all times.

Since this is a positive rewards system, I asked some teachers and school counselors what they thought of this approach to addressing behavior. Here are some of the problems they saw with it:
1) This can be demoralizing to many children, especially children with special needs
2) Contrary to what counselors believes helps children
3) This rewards behavior that they should already be doing
4) The screen shown in class includes their face and behavior points
5) Whoever has the right number of points gets the toy.
6) Violates the counselor ethics when children are demoralized
7) Data collected in the teacher’s cell phones

What should be provided to all school board members and parents?
The whole contract, and look at the encryption, and security protections to see if they match the individual district security requirements.
What about security breaches? Have there been any? Would parents be immediately notified?

Has data from the PBIS system been shared with Keene State BHII? If so, were parents notified and did they consent?

Are parents given the right to opt out of this project?

 Why or why not? Where are schools using the digital badges with PBIS? Which schools? 
Did they let parents know their kids can opt out? 

Were kids forced to wear the digital badges?

There will be a school board hearing on April 5th. This is when parents can object to this tracking device. Parents also have the ability to not consent.

 

The post Attention Raymond PARENTS: NO to Digital Tracking and Digital Badges for Your Children & SCHOOL Board Meeting appeared first on Granite Grok.

For years I’ve been using that phrase to describe most school boards both here in NH and around the nation. They run to be elected to represent us in managing the education systems in our local areas on our behalf but once seated, they deign not to speak to us again.

Especially during the pandemic, I watched people go up to the mic to address their school boards only to get an icy, silent response to their concerns. I can’t tell you how many times single Moms, doing everything they can to keep their families working, address those SBers about their disabled kids only to start crying and turn around in shame because none of their representatives were listening and certainly not addressing their concerns.

I’ll be honest, I grew to just taunt mine of this to make them see the pain they were creating for others simply because once being elected, they collectively believed that they didn’t have to respond to the public.

I sent the following to another education activist because you take the wins that you can when you can them – it looks like the EISFMSs, at least here in Gilford, are starting to realize what is expected of them:

Persistence pays off – but it took 2.5 years to get it done.  Was just perusing the new and revised policies for SAU73 for Monday night’s School Board meeting.  School Board members will now answer questions from interested people during Public Input:

BEDH – PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AT BOARD MEETINGS

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AT BOARD MEETINGS The Board encourages citizens of the district to attend its sessions so that they may become better acquainted with the operation and programs of the schools and that the Board may have the opportunity to hear the comments and suggestions of the public…

<snip>

Members of the Board are without authority to act independently as individuals in official matters. With the approval of the chairperson, a question may be answered by an individual Board member or administrator

Heh! – “They know not what they do” – or have done or about to do”. Maybe. As I said during my first term on the Budget Committee, when the Town Administrator and Finance Director (Evans Juris and Debbie Shackett) tried to force a “Code of Ethics” upon us as elected officials, the attempt was really to shut up myself and another person. My response was “I didn’t hang up my First Amendment Rights once I got elected, AND I sit in my BudComm chair” – I wasn’t going to sign it.

Sidenote: Years later, I now know that neither of those dunderheads had the Power to do that, as there is no RSA (NH Law) that allowed them to do so. Didn’t hurt that I caught them plagiarizing that CoE even as they boasted it was their work, so they dropped it.

Finally, “interested people” will not only be able to speak to have ” …the Board may have the opportunity to hear the comments and suggestions of the public”, the public is going to have the chance to figure out what school board members know and are thinking as well.

This should be interesting Monday night.

 

 

The post Have the Easter Island Stone Faced Moa Statues (School Board Members) Started To Speak? appeared first on Granite Grok.