Maxim Magazine (Australia) just named a transwoman to its latest 100 hottest women list. He’s not even a good-looking guy. It’s quite insulting, so I think the folks over at Maxim Australia wanted some media attention because it used to be a ‘maxim’ that there is no such thing as bad press.

Tell that to Gillette, Bud Light, and Victoria’s Secret (more on them later today).

 

Maxim magazine named a biological male and former Australian rules football player, Danielle Laidley, to its “Hottest 100 Women” list in Australia for 2023, with the trans-identifying man landing in the number 92 spot.

 

There are 99 women, many of whom could qualify as hot – I’ve not seen the list – but there are eight women on the list who were not as hot as the dude in the dress in a magazine whose core audience is heterosexual men, which brings us back to the question, if ‘Danielle’ is “hot,” is it becasue she’s a convicted stalker of women?

 

The magazine released the list on Wednesday and is being blasted not only for honoring a biological male in a list of hot women, but also because three years ago Laidley, who formerly went by the first name of Dean, was arrested for stalking, The Age noted.

In 2020, the Maxim honoree reportedly pleaded guilty to stalking after repeatedly making calls and sending text messages to a woman, also sitting in a car outside her home watching and photographing her, the outlet noted.

 

I’m guessing that Dean decided two things. He needed an image rehab – you’re not allowed to poke fun at transwomen, and being one would conveniently give him access to more women in the bathroom or locker room. And he may have already fancied dressing in women’s clothes, so why not?

But no worries, Western Culture’s not broken. Male predators using woke ideology to gain access to women or girls. It’s almost as we all predicted that. Well, no sh!t, we did (2016).

 

 

Could a truly self-identifying transgender person be a sexual predator? Of course. They could also be a fabulous tenor or great with animals or an amazing mechanic, a-sexual, or indifferent, all of which have nothing to do with the threat being blessed by the idiot-left and their cultural pall-bearers when they insist that “men” who claim to feel like women have a “right” to use the ladies bathroom.

And yes, it is about that.

There are a great deal more sexual predators (by orders of magnitude) than there are self-identifying transgenders. These predators will use that “loophole” as a way to gain access to girls and women in places where they could or may be more vulnerable. … [And]

In the real world, not all men are sexual predators, but some men are, so your opposition to men using the ladies’ room is not about denying manufactured rights to a fraction of a fraction of the population. It is about defending the right of hundreds of millions of girls and women to feel safe in their persons and property in these public spaces.

 

 

I guess down in Australia, at least at Maxim Magazine, that’s hot. I feel bad for Hot Girls 93-100. How do you face your friends? What do you say when the interviewer wonders if there’s something they can do to be hotter than the old guy in a dress?

Exit question. Why not an issue dedicated to a list of the 100 hottest transowmen?

I think we all know the answer.

 

-This is Dani Laidley, a biological male

Dani was just added to the “Hottest 100 Women” list by Maxim Magazine pic.twitter.com/2P4mfywCPy

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) October 19, 2023

 

The post Men’s Magazine Says Ugly Dude in a Dress “Hotter” Than at Least 8 “Hot” Australian Women appeared first on Granite Grok.

What, you haven’t already figured this out? How can you NOT be paying attention if you love your children? “Free speech… that extraordinary thing we have that Muslim countries don’t.”

 

All of that led my brain to a quote that is often falsely attributed to Winston Churchill: “When Muslims are in the minority they are very concerned with minority rights, when they are in the majority there are no minority rights.” The British Bulldog may not have said that, but a look at a map of nations with Sharia law suggests that it’s correct.

 

That phrase “Using our Freedoms and Rights against us” should be dancing in your head right about now. After all, it is about Power – the process of obtaining it (including lying and subterfuge), then aggregating and wielding it.

And while Muslims may have Sharia Law, Socialists & Communists often use “for the common good,” which is just about the same thing. “Disturbing the Peace” can be used for the same purpose.

And then there’s always the “Domestic Terrorist” and “Enemy of the State” that seems to be in more use with the Biden Administration…

 

 

HT:  American Thinker

The post “Free Speech… That Extraordinary Thing We Have That Muslim Countries Don’t.” appeared first on Granite Grok.

Please Come by Fulchino’s Vineyard on Oct. 24th from 6 pm to 8 pm. You are all invited. See the details in the flyer for RSVP.

Please Submit Group communications or Press Releases to editor@granitegrok.com.
Submission is not a guarantee of publication – Publication is not an endorsement.

 

 

 

Reminder: Content about candidates or by candidates is not an endorsement by GraniteGrok.com or its authors.

The post Lily Tang Williams Campaign Fundraiser Event appeared first on Granite Grok.

If you like the convenience of frozen breaded chicken, Tyson Foods is probably on your shopping list. Nuggets, strips, tenders, flavored varieties. They’ve got a wide selection. It is not fine fare but passable, but those winds may be changing direction.

Tyson has purchased Protix in the name of sustainable protein production. What a strange thing to say. All you had to do was keep up with the chickens, and protein is sustained. Nope. Someone at Tyson has a Climate Justice Rasputin whispering in their ear. Make them eat bugs, she whispers (yes, I gendered Tyson’s Rasputin).

 

Tyson Foods Inc. TSN, 0.66% said Tuesday it is planning to acquire a minority stake in Protix, a Dutch company that’s a leader in insect ingredients, as it works on more sustainable protein production. Tyson did not disclose terms, but said it plans to fund Protix’s global expansion. The two have also entered a joint venture that will create and operate an insect ingredient facility in the continental U.S. “Upon completion, it will be the first at-scale facility of its kind to upcycle food manufacturing byproducts into high-quality insect proteins and lipids which will primarily be used in the pet food, aquaculture, and livestock industries,” Tyson said in a statement.

 

Chickens will eat bugs, so there’s no there there, but pet food? While dogs and cats will eat the odd bug, it’s more of a moving target sort of distraction thing. Oh, look, I can grab that. Done. And I’m no expert, but the pet food industry has been shifting toward more honest ingredients, fewer grains and fillers, and even real meat or some form of crude protein.

Are we expecting the generations of people who have eschewed the idea of having children for raising fur babies to embrace bug bits as a source? Is the Tyson Board seeing a forest for the trees scenario where the war on meat will create a vacuum into which they will be positioned to provide a crude protein alternative?

Related: Data From 175 Countries Says, Eat Meat, Live Longer!

Tyson’s Mission Statement, Who We Are Page, briefly shows us the statement: Raising Expectations for How Much Good Food Can Do. Is there an amendment in the works hinting at how much bugs can do for food? Is anyone going to remind anyone else that bug exoskeletons have components toxic to humans?

I only mention this becasue a global food concern with a struggling stock price has purchased a Dutch bugs-to-protein-business with an eye toward funding its global expansion. Absent all the recent 2020s talk about moving us away from food to bugs, it’s probably a nothingburger. But given the globalist obsession with consuming farmland to prevent farming, food production, and the war on meat, I think I’ll encourage my healthy suspicion about their motives.

 

 

The post Why Did Tyson Buy Bug-Parts-as-Food Business? appeared first on Granite Grok.

Kevin Landrigan spoke to the new chair of NH’s Special Gaming Commission, Patrick Abrami, about charity gaming after Andy and Laurie Sanborn’s alleged misconduct over COVID monies and their ownership of a charity gaming establishment (and the new one they want to build).

I know about it, but I don’t know enough to sound smart about it, much less BE smart about it, so I’m not going to write about that. What I am going to do is talk about impropriety. Impropriety is the quality or condition of being improper—an improper act. And in politics, Optics matter. No, not the faux ones that are ramped up by one side or another for political gain. This one is an unforced error. And this from Landrigan caught my eye:

Laurie Sanborn stepped down from the charity casino commission. She has resisted calls from Democratic leaders that she also step down as chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, which acts on all gambling legislation.

If she and Andy have a gambling establishment whose business comes up before the commission, she should never have been on the casino commission in the first place. Wrong decision to have been on it in the first place.

That ALSO should be a given for ALL licensing boards and commission in NH; if you’re a participant in that particular industry, you shouldn’t be on an entity that has oversight and make rules for it.

This should hold for any elected office holder in the House or Senate as well. The LEAST Laurie should do is make the proclamation that she will recuse herself from ANY gambling mentions, discussions, legislation, or votes that might come up. That’s the BARE minimum.

Better is to remove herself from the Leadership position – Impropriety. Remove herself from ANY situation that could place her at risk of being accused of even the hint of an indiscretion. No, I’m not stating that she should resign from the House, but should make sure that ANYONE (and not just Democrats) could make hay with the issue.

And yes, I walked this talk when I was on my Hamlet’s Budget Committee. As my boys were growing up, they were special needs and receiving services from the School District. Whenever that part of the school budget came up, I immediately said that I was recusing myself from all discussions, budget changes, and votes dealing with the Special Education area. I continued that when I was on the BudComm my last term and we had the Grandson with us – Impropriety.

As opposed to Dale Dormody. He campaigned for the BudComm with the caveat that he would never vote on anything to do with the Library as his wife was the Director. Once on the BudComm, his tune began to change:

• I think about keeping my promise
• OK, I’ll vote for library issues but NOT for anything to do with staff
• OK, I will vote on staff issues but not salaries
• Nah, I’ve vote on everything BUT my wife’s salaries (again, the Library Director)
• Nope, I’m voting on everything. And then, with a smile, said, “And there’s nothing you can do to me about it.”

It became known as “The Dormody Rule,” and there was nothing we could do as a Budget Committee. The rest of us resented him for campaigning on certain promises and then did the slow slide to recant from them. We couldn’t remove him, we couldn’t avoid him, we couldn’t ignore any motions (well, perhaps not give a “second” for them), and we couldn’t keep him from voting (or recording his vote).  Why?

He did more research on State Statutes concerning Budget Committees than I had. Being a Dillon’s Rule State, subdivisions of the State (and any subordinate boards and commissions thereof) can only do such things specifically allowed in Law. There is nothing in the BudComm laws that allowed for a recall nor “a throw-off”(of any type from mere shunning to outright removal).

Smuggness.

Impropriety.

So what will Laurie do? Be a Skip or a Dale?

 

HT | Union Leader

The post Impropriety Is A Thing Laurie Sanborn Should Ponder appeared first on Granite Grok.

Jason Williams was elected District Attorney of Loisisana in 2020 with 220,000 little “helpers” from George Soros, and Williams knows who owns him. “Williams declined to prosecute 65% of all criminal cases in New Orleans in 2021.”

As intended by both Soros and the DA, and the Dem party’s ongoing Cloward-Piven-Palooza, crime rose.

 

New Orleans was named the “murder capital of the United States” in 2022, and violent crime was the leading cause of death for children in the city that same year. Auto thefts in the city have increased 104% since 2022, and total crime has increased 8% since the start of the year, police data showed.

 

It was only a matter of time before the chickens came for the DA’s rhetorical “roost.”

 

Williams was walking his 78-year-old mother to his car when two suspects approached the pair, pointed a gun at them and demanded the DA’s car, according to WVUE. The suspects then jumped into the car and drove off before abandoning the vehicle in an undisclosed location and carjacking a young woman in the area 30 minutes later, the NOPD confirmed.

 

No one believes they knew he was the DA, but imagine if they did? His car might not have been jacked. Dude, as thanks for leaving us on the street to engage is acts of self-betterment at the expense of others, we will carjack someone else this evening. Have a nice night.

No one was injured unless we wanted to include the DA’s pride. It’s always a surprise to progressives when the side effects of their policies manage to reach them. Or a surprise how tone-deaf they are in response to that happening.

 

“I think it’s important to reiterate that my mother and I are just a small fraction of the number of people impacted by violence in this city,” he said. “We have to collectively work on crime-prevention efforts, policing efforts and our prosecution efforts.”

 

The Daily Caller reports that since the crime spike in 2021, “The DA still continues to prosecute, on average, only 44% of the criminals who have been charged by police.”

They stole his Lincoln Navigator, which starts at 82,765.

 

 

The post Something About Chickens Coming Home … Soros Funded DA Carjacked at Gun Point appeared first on Granite Grok.

Recently, George Clooney and a bunch of other wealthy actors offered to pony up tens of millions of their dollars to help other, less-wealthy actors afford things like medical care, rent, and food while the Screen Actors Guild renegotiates its contract.

Note what these wealthy actors didn’t do. They didn’t say: We’re going to give money to everyone who needs it, just to our fellow actors.

Also, they didn’t say: We’re going to try to use politics to force other people to give money to these actors. We’ll keep this within the acting community.

Which is to say, although it’s probably unintentional, George and his friends are illustrating a point I made a while ago: That if the Democratic Party really wants to have single-payer healthcare, or subsidized schools that serve as parental surrogates, or any of its other progressive desires, it could do that right now.

All it has to do is say:  The wealthier Democrats will pay the costs of _________ for the less-wealthy Democrats, leaving everyone else out of it:

https://granitegrok.com/blog/2019/03/the-single-payer-party

The party doesn’t have to wait for the government to act or work to wrest control of government so party members can get what they want (or what party leadership tells them they should want).

All the party needs to understand is that to help one group of people — actors, Democrats, parents of gender-confused children, or anyone else — you don’t need to get everyone in on the act.  Especially people who abhor what you’re trying to do, and will fight you every step of the way.

(Similarly, the other major party needs to understand that to control the moral behavior of its members, it can do that without policing the behavior of everyone else.)

Why is this such a difficult thing for people to understand?  I mean, even George Clooney gets it.

 

The post George Clooney Shows the Way Forward appeared first on Granite Grok.

Rigging elections in the Police State of America … you know, Zuckerbucks, false Russia-bounties story, “intelligence community” telling us Hunter’s laptop is “Russia-disinformation” and Big-tech and the Regime-media then censoring the laptop, “ballot-harvesting,” voting-by-mail, etc., etc., etc., is actually “fortifying” democracy.

Mocking rigged elections, in contrast, is a crime against democracy. But just keep pretending America is the “greatest country on the face of the earth,” that the GOP is ever going to do something about the two-tiered system of justice designed to maintain UniParty control, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Ep 1246 – A Trump Supporter Was Just Sent To Federal Prison For A Meme https://t.co/HIEkItzjZ5

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) October 19, 2023

In 2016 @mskristinawong posted a tweet and video jokingly trying to trick Trump voters into not voting. Douglas Mackey did the exact same thing to Hillary voters. The DOJ just threw Mackey in prison. Wong was never charged with anything, and this tweet is still up. pic.twitter.com/8stqn0n1oS

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) October 19, 2023

JUST IN: Douglass Mackey has been sentenced to prison for sharing memes about Hillary Clinton & the 2016 election.

His crime? Posting memes about Hillary, joking about being able to vote by phone, similar to how people vote on American Idol.

Mackey will be spending the next… pic.twitter.com/mVWY6Kkr7O

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) October 18, 2023

BREAKING: "Douglass Mackey, a meme maker, got sent to jail for making memes and that’s election interference. The country you grew up in no longer exists"pic.twitter.com/FzGZ9I4OgV

— Jack Poso (@JackPosobiec) October 18, 2023

The post The Police State Of America … Biden-Regime Imprisons Man For Meme Mocking Democrats appeared first on Granite Grok.

Right Side Up Radio has been a weekly installment on (WNTK 99.7) since May of 2023, and ever since we announced VermontGrok, Mike Tagliavia and Bill Huff have been asking me on their radio show to talk VT and NH politics. We finally made it happen.

It was great to be on the radio again. I’ve not done any that I recall since the last episode of Liz Gabert’s Life with Liz, where Skip and I were a regular feature. Whether that was good or bad is up to you (and Liz), but since we can’t seem to get our own podcast legs underneath us (how many misfires so far, four), it was good to be part of one that has.

Based out of Vermont but with an audience across New Hampshire’s left side, I spoke with Bill and Mike about the rise of GraniteGrok and VermontGrok, the slippery slope of Vermont politics, the New Hampshire primary, Politics on both sides of the Connecticut River, and a few other odds and ends.

I had a good time, so please give us a listen and support some conservative radio.

I’m in segments one and two, so you can start from the beginning – but please listen to the end.

 

 

 

The post On the Air with ‘Right Side Up’ – Talking Politics on Both Sides of the Connecticut River appeared first on Granite Grok.

Crowd of Revolutionaries Gathers to Read and Sign the new Declaration of Independence.

NEW HAMPSHIRE – For the first time in the state’s recorded history, legislators in the New Hampshire House of Representatives have filed two bills aimed at giving voters the opportunity to vote on whether or not New Hampshire will peacefully secede from the United States of America.

State Representative Matthew Santonastaso (R – Cheshire 18) has sponsored a groundbreaking new bill that will force the creation of a Secession Study Committee in the Granite State. This comes on the heels of a bill filed recently by State Rep. Jason Gerhard (R – Merrimack 25) that if passed, would allow voters to amend the New Hampshire Constitution, declaring that the state will secede from the United States should the national debt reach a staggering $40 trillion.

The Secession Study Committee, as envisioned by the bill, won’t just be a cursory look into New Hampshire declaring its peaceful independence from the United States. It will delve into understanding the multifaceted implications, the potential benefits, and the challenges that New Hampshire might face if it were to consider seceding from the Union. This initiative underscores the urgency and importance of having a well-informed discussion on the subject.

Representative Santonastaso stated,“Given the current challenges at the federal level and potential unforeseen changes in the national landscape, it’s essential to study the feasibility of an independent New Hampshire. This effort is not about neglecting our shared history; it’s about proactive planning and ensuring our state shall persist under any circumstance.”

Carla Gericke, President Emeritus of New Hampshire’s Free State Project, weighed in on the matter, stating “The increase in the number of New Hampshireites, and now our legislators, who support peacefully exiting the Union, is indicative of the Biden admin’s complete and utter failure to represent the interests of our state. The federal government have nobody to thank but themselves for the inevitable result – more and more of us want to choose freedom.”

Matt Sabourin dit Choinière, the chairman of the New Hampshire Independence Political Action Committee, commented “The purpose of these bills is to get the tough questions relating to independence out on the table, and then get some answers to the public, it’s basically an outline for future grand national strategy. My father always said growing up that if a private business were to operate the same way as the government, they’d be locked in prison. It’s time to fire D.C.”

In the state’s 2022 legislative session, the House rejected a proposal that would give voters the opportunity to amend the New Hampshire constitution, allowing the state to peacefully declare independence from the United States. While opponents of New Hampshire’s secessionist movement have historically argued that the federal government is a net positive or at the least can be molded into one, proponents have argued that the federal government is too far gone – citing issues such as inflation, ongoing wars abroad, and healthcare. New Hampshire is one of approximately 25 states that pays more in taxes to the federal government than they receive in federal funding.

Once introduced, both bills will move to committee for further discussion and review. If passed, the Secession Study Committee would be comprised of members from both the House and Senate, as well as experts in economics, law, and governance. Their findings would be presented to the state legislature for consideration.

For the full press release see: https://nhipac.org/2023/10/18/684/

To all those who are sending in memes, thank you!  Keep them coming please, as it helps me gather weaponry to fight the Left.  Please do share this post, and if you share an individual meme, consider mentioning you saw it on the Grok!

Speaking of, from this week, Monday Edition and Wednesday Edition.  Also check out my latest Israel-focused meme & commentary post.  Memes… but also links and commentary about the situation.

 

*** Warning, a few possibly off-color ones, in case tender eyes are about ***

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

 

ANYONE who thinks bringing a million+ Palestinians here absolutely NEEDS to read Brigitte Gabriel’s book BECAUSE THEY HATE about her experiences with that Palestinian in-migration into then-Catholic Lebanon… and how they took over.

Not only did they merely take over, but all the do-gooder types were pleading “But we protected you, welcomed you, helped you, advocated for you…”  The answer was simple: Stupid Infidel.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Understand that for the most of them, the ones that took it in “good faith”, I have enormous sympathy.  Much less so for those who preened about it and wanted to force everyone to take it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

Pick of the Post:

 

 

What is that, a block of Velveeta??  I can feel my arteries hardening just thinking about that…

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

Palate Cleansers:

 

—

—

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

And don’t forget… come back Monday for another edition.  Same Meme Time.  Same Meme channel.

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

The post Friday Meme Overflow-Overflow appeared first on Granite Grok.

Two guys are sitting on a beach; after some small talk, one mentions how they owned a business for many years until the fire. Luckily, they were insured. Everything was taken care of, and they could still retire in style. The second guy looks at the first and says, what a coincidence.

They, too, owed a business, and when a flood took it out, they had adequate coverage and could recoup their losses and retire in style.

The first guy, looking puzzled, turns to the second and says, “How do you start a flood?”

It is not uncommon for a business to burn legitimately, but there is always the chance it was an insurance fire—a way to get out from under a failing business. And not just a business. Homes too. I know that seems cynical, and my apologies. Many people lose much in any number of disasters. The flooding in Vermont this past spring was not as record-setting as advertised, but it was significant. It changed many lives, ended some, and washed out homes, businesses, and livelihoods.

Like the COVID response. The PPP Loans. Medical and bailout money fraud. The system increasingly lends itself to the means and opportunity to do better at someone else’s expense. The entire green energy net-zero movement also comes to mind. And with it, the volatile power cells upon which it stands—lithium Ion batteries. I had to get certified to handle them at the job I used to do. They are considered hazardous materials. They can start fires that take out freighters, trucks, and aircraft. Their ubiquity has taken cars, homes, apartment buildings, businesses, and lives.

Using them to start insurance fires seems logical, as “vehicles” for arson or to hide another crime. Instead of finding the body of the DNC staffer who leaked all the internal emails in a bathtub, they could leave him in his burning Tesla, even though he never owned one. No worries, the FBI is still convinced it’s not suspicious.

New York City, the poster child for the problem of Lithium battery fires, has had more than 200 of them in a single year, and there’s no easy way to put them out.

 

“The lithium-ion battery adds a different degree, when we talk about the fire dynamics of it,” FDNY Deputy Assistant Chief Frank Leeb said at the briefing. “These rooms flash over in just a mere matter of seconds.” …

The problem is that lithium-ion fires burn extremely hot and are virtually impervious to conventional firefighting methods that use water or foam. In fact, lithium reacts very badly to water, which is really a problem if firefighters are attacking a fire for which they don’t know the cause.

 

It follows as night follows day. There will be numerous fires from faulty products, mishandling, or damage, but there will also be some who find it easier to have a delivery bike do the deed than to rely on the old exhaust system or faulty wiring.

And yes, insurance companies, like they have begun to do with electric vehicles, will offset the increased risk with much higher rates for dwelling owners who allow any EV in or on the premises. To protect themselves from mayhem, like how EV batteries can explode when overcome by flood water.

 

The post Are Lithium Ion Batteries the Future of “Insurance” Fires? appeared first on Granite Grok.

For those who remember the days and months that followed 9/11, there is an unnerving feeling of déjà vu about the Hamas attacks on Israel. The same shocking images of carnage and grief dominating the news. The same disbelief that anyone could be so hateful, so monstrous, so evil as to do this to another human being.

“Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”—Hermann Goering, German military commander and Hitler’s designated successor

The same outpourings of support and unity from around the world. The same shared fear that this could easily have happened to us or our loved ones.

Now, once again, the drums of war are sounding on the world stage, not that they ever really stopped. Israel is preparing to invade Gaza, the Palestinians are nearing a humanitarian crisis, and the rest of the world is bracing for whatever blowback comes next.

Here in the United States, as we approach the 22nd anniversary of the USA Patriot Act on October 26, we’re still grappling with the blowback that arises from allowing one’s freedoms to be eviscerated in exchange for the phantom promise of security.

Here are a few lessons that we never learned or learned too late.

Mammoth legislation that expands the government’s powers at the citizenry’s expense will not make anyone safer. Rushed through Congress a mere 45 days after the 9/11 attacks, the USA Patriot Act drove a stake through the heart of the Bill of Rights, undermined civil liberties, expanded the government’s powers, and opened the door to far-reaching surveillance by the government on American citizens.

Pre-emptive strikes will only lead to further blowback. Not content to wage war against Afghanistan, which served as the base for Osama bin Laden, the U.S. embarked on a pre-emptive war against Iraq in order to “stop any adversary challenging America’s military superiority and adopt a strike-first policy against terrorist threats ‘before they’re fully formed.’” We are still suffering the consequences of this failed policy, which resulted in lives lost, taxpayer dollars wasted, the fomenting of hatred against the U.S., and the further radicalization of terrorist cells.

War is costly. There are many reasons to go to war, but those who have advocated that the U.S. remain at war, year after year, are the very entities that have profited most from these endless military occupations and exercises. Thus far, the U.S. taxpayer has been made to shell out more than $8 trillion to wage wars abroad, including the lifetime price of health care for disabled veterans and interest on the national debt. That also does not include the more than hundreds of thousands of civilians killed or the millions displaced from their homes as a result of endless drone strikes and violence.

The tactics and weapons of war, once deployed abroad, will eventually be used against the citizenry at home. The horrors that took place at Abu Ghraib, the American-run prison in Iraq, involved “US military personnel humiliating, hurting and abusing Iraqi prisoners in a myriad of perverse ways. While American servicemen and women smiled and gave thumbs up, naked men were threatened by dogs, or were hooded, forced into sexual positions, placed standing with wires attached to their bodies, or left bleeding on prison floors.” Adding to the descent into moral depravity, the United States government legalized the use of torture, including waterboarding, in violation of international law and in the so-called pursuit of national security. The ramifications have been far-reaching, with domestic police mirroring a battlefield mindset in their encounters with American citizens, including the use of torture tactics at secret locations such as Homan Square in Chicago.

Allowing the government to spy on the citizenry will not reduce acts of terrorism, but it will result in a watched, submissive, surveillance society. Not only did the USA Patriot Act normalize the government’s mass surveillance powers, but it also dramatically expanded the government’s authority to spy on its own citizens without much, if any, oversight. Thus, a byproduct of this post-9/11 age in which we live, whether you’re walking through a store, driving your car, checking email, or talking to friends and family on the phone, you can be sure that some government agency is listening in and tracking your behavior. This doesn’t even begin to touch on the corporate trackers that monitor your purchases, web browsing, Facebook posts, and other activities taking place in the cyber sphere. We have all become data collected in government files.

News cycle distractions are calibrated to ensure that you lose sight of what the government is doing. The average American has a hard time keeping up with and remembering all of the “events,” manufactured or otherwise, which occur like clockwork and keep us distracted, deluded, amused, and insulated from the reality of the American police state. Whether these events are critical or unimportant, when we’re being bombarded with wall-to-wall news coverage and news cycles that change every few days, it’s difficult to stay focused on one thing—namely, holding the government accountable for abiding by the rule of law—and the powers-that-be understand this. In this way, regularly scheduled trivia and/or distractions that keep the citizenry tuned into the various breaking news headlines and entertainment spectacles also keep them tuned out to the government’s steady encroachments on their freedoms.

If you stop holding the government accountable to the rule of law, the only laws it abides by will be the ones used to clamp down on the citizenry. Having failed to hold government officials accountable for abiding by the rule of law, the American people have found themselves saddled with a government that skirts, flouts, and violates the Constitution with little consequence. Overcriminalization, asset forfeiture schemes, police brutality, profit-driven prisons, warrantless surveillance, SWAT team raids, indefinite detentions, covert agencies, and secret courts are just a few of the egregious practices carried out by a government that operates beyond the reach of the law.

Do not turn your country into a battlefield, your citizens into enemy combatants, and your law enforcement officers into extensions of the military. A standing army—something that propelled the early colonists into revolution—strips the citizenry of any vestige of freedom. How can there be any semblance of freedom when there are tanks in the streets, military encampments in cities, Blackhawk helicopters, and armed drones patrolling overhead? It was for this reason that those who established America vested control of the military in a civilian government with a civilian commander-in-chief. They did not want a military government ruled by force. Rather, they opted for a republic bound by the rule of law: the U.S. Constitution. Unfortunately, we in America now find ourselves struggling to retain some semblance of freedom in the face of police and law enforcement agencies that look and act like the military and have just as little regard for the Fourth Amendment, laws such as the NDAA that allow the military to arrest and indefinitely detain American citizens, and military drills that acclimate the American people to the sight of armored tanks in the streets, military encampments in cities, and combat aircraft patrolling overhead.

As long as you remain fearful and distrustful of each other, you will be incapable of standing united against any threats posed by a power-hungry government. Early on, U.S. officials solved the problem of how to implement their authoritarian policies without incurring a citizen uprising: fear. The powers-that-be want us to feel threatened by forces beyond our control (terrorists, shooters, bombers). They want us afraid and dependent on the government and its militarized armies for our safety and well-being. Most of all, they want us distrustful of each other, divided by our prejudices, and at each other’s throats.

Once you trade your freedom for security, the terrorists win. We’ve walked a strange and harrowing road since September 11, 2001, littered with the debris of our once-vaunted liberties. We have gone from a nation that took great pride in being a model of a representative democracy to being a model of how to persuade freedom-loving people to march in lockstep with a police state. And in so doing, we have proven Osama Bin Laden right. He warned that “freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in — and the West in general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life.”

It took a long time to clear away the rubble from the 9/11 attacks.

Yet, as I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, 22 years after the USA Patriot Act was unleashed on a vulnerable nation, we are still reeling from the destruction it has wrought on our freedoms.

 

John W. Whitehead | The Rutherford Institute

The post Postcards from a Police State: 22 Years of Blowback from the USA Patriot Act appeared first on Granite Grok.

Komrade Kuster has adopted the idea that she is a legislator for life—the Ruling Class DC ambassador to the warm bodies assembled in New Hampshire’s second congressional district every election day.

If you look at a map, CD2 is geographically and politically on the left side of New Hampshire, getting its most liberal votes from college towns (Keene, Plymouth, Hanover) and cities like Nashua and Concord.

The smaller blue-leaning towns in the more sparsely populated sections are, in part, a well, poisoned by progressives who fled Vermont’s socialist decline only to inflict it here. They creep across the Connecticut River to vote in our elections and have for years, but some also make the move permanent. Hoping to escape the slippery slope of Vermont socialism but, like any virus, infecting the healthy cells they then inhabit.

CD-2 is a decidedly Democrat district, and winning it back would take the right candidate and more money than the GOP would ever spend. Let’s not write it off, but the last Republican to win it was very progressive, and they lost it to a Democrat six elections ago.

Anyway, as I understand it, Annie Kuster (formerly Ann McLane Kuster or Ann ‘Raise the Roof’ Kuster) is a genuinely nice person outside of politics, but why would any of that matter? Her ideological ghetto almost guarantees her reappointment every two years, and, as noted above and as you’ll see below, she knows it.

She is about as captured an actor of the party narrative as you could be.

It’s embarrassing.

 

 

center

 

The post Klueless Ann Kuster appeared first on Granite Grok.

The term “Bidenomics” has become synonymous with the economic policies of the Biden administration and let’s be frank, they have failed on every possible level. I can’t bite my tongue any longer on this. Bidenomics is not only crushing the American spirit but it’s making millions of Americans dependent on our government, which is not the American dream and will have chilling effects on the future of this nation.

While presented as a plan to bolster the financial well-being of Americans, a closer look at the Bidenomics fact sheet reveals a different story — one where the average American is shouldering the burden of inflation and increasingly high interest rates due to Bidenomics.

The effects of these policies are far more pronounced than what the media and the administration are willing to admit. So while the media and the Biden administration is not willing to speak the truth, I will speak out on this.

Recent data from the U.S. Census Bureau, analyzed in depth by Stephen Moore in his recent New York Post op-ed, paints a troubling picture of the state of poverty in America.

What’s most shocking in this data is the sharp increase in poverty rates for both adults and children. In just a year, from 2021 to 2022, poverty in America rose from 7.8% to 12.4%, marking an alarming increase of 58.9%. Equally concerning is the fact that the child poverty rate also doubled, soaring from 5.2% to 12.4%.

The question we must ask is this: How is Bidenomics working for the American people if over 10% of our nation’s children are living at or below the poverty line? I refuse to accept for a minute that have 10% of America’s youth living at or below the poverty line is something for the Biden administration to celebrate in any way.

In addition, The Federal Reserve plays a major role in U.S. economic policy and can significantly influence the state of the economy in 2023. As inflation remains a pressing concern, the Federal Reserve faces the difficult task of deciding when and how to raise interest rates in this era of increasing interest rates due to Bidenomics.

The prospect of more interest rate hikes has raised questions about the state of the economy, and many are left wondering why the economy is in such a precarious position.

Make no mistake, Bidenomics has heightened tax disparities between states. Forbes reports that California now bears the heaviest income tax burden in the nation, a staggering 13.3%, while Florida enjoys a tax haven status with no state income tax. California’s corporate tax rate at 8.84% far exceeds Florida’s 5.5%.

These punishing taxes deter investment and innovation in California, leading businesses and individuals to seek refuge in lower-tax states like Florida.

Equally concerning is the unchecked rise in living and housing costs in California, exacerbated by Bidenomics. According to PolitiFact, California’s median home price in May 2021 reached a staggering $818,260, compared to Florida’s more reasonable $344,900. Rent is substantially higher in California, with a median monthly rate of $2,518 for a two-bedroom apartment, versus Florida’s $1,256.

Working-class Americans work tirelessly to make ends meet, yet they find themselves at odds with an economy that seems to be working against them. This government’s role in shaping the economy cannot be underestimated, and it’s essential to scrutinize whether the current policies truly serve the people.

The Bidenomics plan aimed to change the economy for the better but it’s an epic failure.

As the nation grapples with inflation and extremely high interest rates, it’s clear that these policies have fallen short of their promises by every single measurable benchmark. The recession forecast looms large, and Americans are left wondering about the steps a nation can take to achieve economic growth.

Furthermore, millions of Americans are being faced with tough decisions every week about whether to put gas in their car to get to work or food in their refrigerator. This is not the American dream that we all love so much, it’s America in decline.

Bidenomics may have promised to improve the financial well-being of Americans, but the reality is far from what was anticipated. Inflation, housing costs, sagging stock market and increasing interest rates have brought about a challenging economic landscape, with many struggling to make ends meet.

The American spirit is being crushed under the weight of inflation and soaring interest rates, stark reminders of the consequences of these policies. As we peer into the economic horizon of 2023, the looming recession is a haunting specter, casting doubt on the effectiveness of Bidenomics in delivering on its promises. Bidenomics is a resounding failure by every single indicator.

Bob Rubin is the Founder and President of Rubin Wealth Advisors. He can be found at https://www.rubinwealthadvisors.com/

 

Bob Rubin | Daily Caller News Service

The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline, and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

The post The Stone Cold Truth About Bidenomics appeared first on Granite Grok.

One of the most eventful things to have happened recently was from an unexpected source. The State Department and the intelligence apparatus didn’t initiate any coups somewhere in the Third World, the Kremlin didn’t launch a blitzkrieg and capture Kiev, and a currency from the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) hasn’t entered circulation yet.

For the man who was once heralded as a savior for spearheading electric vehicle technology (even with bylines backing Barack Obama) and space exploration, Elon Musk has once again reaffirmed his status as the Beltway’s number one opponent in an extremely bold fashion, far outpacing his purchase of Twitter and the release of the Twitter Files. He denied a Ukrainian request to turn on Starlink and use it to help Kiev launch drone strikes on the Crimean city of Sevastopol.

The reaction was intense. Establishment media outlets screamed bloody treachery over the revelation that Musk singlehandedly thwarted a massive strike that could have been a game changer in Ukraine’s war with Russia, and the media dogpiled on Musk’s handling of X (formerly Twitter) for allowing “Russian propaganda.” Kyiv was livid, declaring that Musk had been complicit in the deaths of innocent Ukrainian civilians. However, Musk stood by his decision. Given the importance of Ukraine (and its access to the Black Sea) to Russia as a geographical barrier preventing it from being encircled in continental Europe by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), as well as the fact that NATO has already signaled that it will allow Ukraine to join once the war with Russia is over, Moscow has every strategic reason to prevent the recapturing of Crimea.

Aside from the media outrage, however, have been the cheers Musk has been receiving, which would not have been there if this incident had happened twenty years earlier. Many of the people who cheered for Musk aren’t predominantly tech geeks or social liberals; they’re from the American heartland, proud to wave the Stars and Stripes and be a good conservative patriot. Once upon a time, these people were unabashed in their defense of American foreign policy, declaring that it was America’s responsibility to democratize the world with bombs. However, the argument no longer captivates them; the recipients of these regime changes didn’t democratize as hoped. Iraq is under an authoritarian and corrupt state, while Afghanistan fell to the Taliban as ordinary Afghans became fed up with the corruption of American-backed Kabul and have demonstrated a preference for (a rough) peace. These conservative Americans are fed up with seeing their standard of living going away and genuinely well-intentioned relatives dying in failed wars that were for nothing; they want their money spent on issues that are more pressing.

Even better, many of them also want the government to step out altogether on certain matters. Vivek Ramaswamy and Ron DeSantis are adamant about getting rid of the Department of Education and returning education back to state policy. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has earned much enthusiasm from libertarians for calling for a return to hard money by backing the dollar with bitcoin and gold, effectively constraining much of the Federal Reserve’s power. Donald Trump remains just as relevant as ever, with the ongoing indictments in Georgia making him look like the archenemy of the Beltway. Polarization is growing ever deeper—no longer between Left and Right but instead between the political elite and the dissidents. The talk of the town next year will be between Trump, Ramaswamy, Kennedy Jr., and maybe DeSantis, not Nikki Haley or Mike Pence.

Being completely realistic here, however, the chances of a much-needed downsize of government power—especially on matters well-engrained as the common ground of both the Left and Right of the Beltway—are a virtual impossibility. The political pundits and the Beltway aren’t giving up without a fight, and much of that only signals to voters how nervous the Beltway is. Even if one of these candidates wins the presidential election, the case of Trump’s many attempts to pull out of Afghanistan and how his staff routinely sabotaged him is a grim reminder. One can argue that Trump should have appointed better employees, but under the weight of having your fate decided by people who could remove you from office by voting for impeachment, there’s not much you can do. Would Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell not have voted for impeachment if Trump had immediately followed suit with his promises to pull troops out of Afghanistan and normalize relations with Russia?

We’ve already seen states attempting to remove Trump from the ballot. One Proud Boys member has been sentenced to twenty-two years of imprisonment for the events of January 6th, even though he didn’t attend the riot. Musk is currently being sued by the Department of Justice for not hiring non–United States citizens, even though doing so would have violated international arms trafficking laws. Returning to the complicated relationship between Trump and establishment Senate Republicans, a unilateral change in foreign or domestic policy that goes outside the acceptable boundaries of interventionism, sound money, and the managerial state will not be accepted by the Beltway. They will only accept something that can benefit their ideals; in other words, they will twist and co-opt the opposition into backing the very same ideas that betray liberty.

Indeed, while the conservative movement is experiencing a change of mind, there are proposals that are heartily embraced by the Beltway or can be manipulated into servicing its plans. When Ramaswamy talks about his love for the Constitution, why Americans are dangerously ignorant about the purpose of the Constitution, and how he can rectify this ignorance by imposing a civics test that determines whether the test takers can vote, Ramaswamy should realize that—beyond the reaction from Leftists—the Beltway can determine how the Constitution is to be interpreted by the people, such as what constitutes free speech or sedition. With Republicans now backing “semiconductor independence,” what they mean is to throw more taxpayer money onto wasteful and inefficient economic projects, something Ramaswamy and the other candidates support. Kennedy Jr. wants a return of the fairness doctrine for traditional media to curb polarization, but who will do the enforcing? Like Ramaswamy’s civics test, the fairness doctrine will be enforced by the bureaucrats who have protection from establishment lawmakers.

Ultimately, and unfortunately, while there are major changes in policy orientation, the fundamental point that the government ought to do more remains and is reinforced by the idea that the government is run by incompetent people. Ramaswamy, Kennedy Jr., the rest of the candidates, and much of the general public view the government getting out of the way as part of the government doing something to rectify the problem—contrary to libertarian thinking that the government is the source of the problem.

For Kennedy Jr., restoring the gold standard is part of a broader plan to establish an alternative form of progressivism, where portions of the bureaucracy and government interference in the economy are exponentially expanded. For Ramaswamy, national independence takes greater precedence than individuality and freedom of exchange, which means international trade becomes more of a foreign policy issue than an economic one.

We’re only at the tip of the iceberg. We’re only approaching 2024, with 2028 and so on further in the future. It can’t be stressed enough how much the new populist movement has inherited from the Beltway Left on matters relating to the role of the government and the economy. The ideological positions of the “national conservatives”—or the “progressive right”—are a response to the supposed championing of laissez-faire economics even though these national conservatives have never accounted for the fact that the word “capitalism” has been so heavily distorted into legitimizing big government policies under Republican administrations (need I remind you of who called for a national lockdown and who started inflating the currency during covid?). With economic progressivism favored by the Beltway and much of the public living under the illusion that the US only needs to replace the incompetent people at the helm with competent people, America is still on the road to serfdom.

If anything, what Elon Musk was able to accomplish with Twitter (now X) did much to expose the Beltway’s activities, as well as Musk doing his bit to try and prevent a potential escalation of the war. Libertarians should raise a glass to him for not only fighting against government encroachment but demonstrating that the fight for liberty can be done more efficiently than betting on 2024.

 

Jeremy Powell is a blogger on Substack. His X (formerly Twitter) handle is @jpowell145.

Jeremy Powell | Mises Wire We heartily encourage reprints and shares of Mises Wire articles. If you wish to reproduce an article in your blog, magazine, radio show, newspaper column, classroom material, textbook, discussion group, website, or any other venue, please do so. The original publication source must be included in an appropriate place.

The post The Spirit of the Establishment Will Thrive under a “Populist Opposition” Government appeared first on Granite Grok.

While Steve said a number of things that are absolutely true in his post “At Least One Person Was Not Happy to See Me at the NHGOP Leadership Summit,” this one is the nugget, IMHO, that should stick with you.

“Elected office becomes more about what political power can do for them, not how they might use their influence to restrain it.”

Power is a very corrosive addiction. So many people want to get involved in politics, some for the wrong reasons and some for the right ones. The wrong ones include “To Be Someone” or “Be Seen as Someone of Some Repute.” The ones that I consider to be the right ones are mostly centered around the idea of Limited Government.

And let me further expand that (and this is for you, Southern Poverty Law Center, which branded GraniteGrok as Anti-Government) – seeing that our four (at least here in NH) levels of Government have grown so large, so intrusive and so expensive…

 

Sidenote: after sucking in over $4 Trillion a year, now running a $2 Trillion yearly deficit and a national debt of $34 Trillion (meaning we spend $808 JUST TO PAY THE INTEREST on it – 15% of our national expenditures that are going to RISE because of the Federal Bank raising interest rates. Yet, WE’RE the domestic terrorists because we keep pointing out this fiscal fraud being foisted upon our grandchildren??

 

…that we haven’t had “Limited Government” for decades (think FDR, LBJ, Nixon, Reagan, Obama, Trump, and now Biden, for a few). Our mission SHOULD be LIMITING our Government levels – full stop.

Gaining and then possessing political Power means you have OUR purse. And as they dole out OUR dollars, they see their personal political Power rise (right, Jeb Bradley?).  Always expansion and never, as Steve points out, restraining it. NO Democrat that I know of wants even one dollar less in their budget. Sadly, too many Republicans are in that same camp.

Yet, GraniteGrok and other conservative outlets and activists become the “Oppressors” (to use the wording of the Left), and the spenders become the “pitiful victims.” It’s always the Washington Monument Syndrome variations with these people. Don’t agree with increased spending that piles up debt, WE are the problem and not those raiding our wallets and bank accounts.

I wish I had been able to, but now, in my late 60s, I find myself with a young family again – my priorities have had to change, and I am staying home the majority of my time. But Steve sussed out the major problem with many Establishment Rs – they neither can debate or defend their stances and philosophy against the Constitutions and the NH GOP’s own Platform.

Thus, we shouldn’t be surprised, as we have said many times here on the ‘Grok, when their oath is a mere formality, words quickly said and then forgotten, and not an ironclad promise to us all.

And THAT’S when I have no problem accepting the Mantle of ” GraniteGrok DOES cost Republicans votes” – and hopefully the right ones that show us, by their own words, legislation, and votes, they deserve to be cast out of Power. Like Brodie DeShaies last election. This year, I think it will be no secret that a target will be Democrat-Lite Republicans Mike Bordes, Travis O’Hara, and David Nagel from Belknap County screwing over Parents by actively working with the Democrats in killing off the attempts at legally codifying that PARENTS are responsible and in charge of raising their children and NOT Government.

 

The post An Amplification of What Steve Said, About Political Power appeared first on Granite Grok.

Western Europe is culturally dying and will ultimately lose its independence to new arrivals: Muslims. Eventually, they will be forced to fully embrace Islam or else. This means America will be next, and no one is doing anything about it!

The idea that Muslims are only a very small minority and it is simply not possible that this small group could destroy America from within is a myth that the leftist media crafted and forced down the throats of gullible Americans. These new arrivals have figured out that changing America through subversion (stealth jihad) is easier than violent jihad.

Muslims will never assimilate, and there is a reason for that:

Because it is obligatory for a Muslim to follow Islamic scriptures and not a man-made law such as the US Constitution. Therefore, Muslims will refuse to embrace the American way of life. Sadly, we have not learned anything from the 9/11 attacks but instead act like we suffer from Stockholm Syndrome.

Along with a few other concerned citizens, I have been sounding the alarm for decades to no avail. Apathy, political correctness, and massive Islamic lobbying have successfully prevented the public from truly grasping the all-pervasive nature of the Islamic assault. But, the alarmists are getting old, and we have no replacement for them, which means America, as we know it, will not survive this subversion and an assault on our culture.

The younger American generation is ill-equipped to handle what will be coming at them.

Final Warning: Defeating encroaching Islam will be the future generations’ greatest challenge. If we don’t defeat Islam politically and do it swiftly, our children, grandchildren, and their children could be engaged in a religious and ideological bloody war, the likes of which have never been seen on American soil.

 

The post Islam in America appeared first on Granite Grok.

The ongoing war in Gaza; what should Israel do? Would any country take Gazans in? Why does the world not care about Armenians being displaced by Azerbaijan? The election for Speaker of the House; are RINO’s blocking any conservative from winning that post? Is the inability to elect a new speaker bad for the republicans? Should the Freedom Caucus demand that the whole party stand for conservative principles? Biden wants $100 billion for Ukraine and Israel—where does the money come from?

The post The Conservatarian Exchange Podcast #176 appeared first on The Liberty Block.

Jim Jordan’s bid to become Speaker of the House of Representatives has been illuminating. It shows that the Democrats have a working majority in the House … which explains why NOTHING has really changed since the Republicans supposedly took “control” of the House.

As of the time I am writing this (10/19 – 10:00 am), a relative handful of UniParty RINOs, who apparently are totally contemptuous of the Republican voters who put them there, have blocked Jordan and now are talking about an insidious coalition with the House Democrats in order to continue “business as usual.”

Remember this when they tell you “just vote Republican” up and down the ticket.

As noted here, any plan to make McHenry speaker will take a deal with Hakeem Jeffries to get Democrat votes and promise to support Biden spending bills, and will empower the “temporary” bipartisan speaker through next year. GOP would be giving Democrats control of the House. https://t.co/SckCMPqBES

— Jim DeMint (@JimDeMint) October 19, 2023

The only way McHenry becomes Speaker is with significant Democrat support and Hakeem Jeffries’ blessing. McHenry is now the official candidate of D.C. Democrats and turncoat Republicans. Any “Republican” who goes along with it needs to be primaried and thrown out of office. https://t.co/trtzwsdJI1

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) October 18, 2023

The Republican establishment wants to prop up Patrick McHenry as a “permanent” temporary Speaker.

McHenry is not a conservative at all.

His Liberty Score is a 45.8%. That’s less than half.

He did nothing when Trump had the election stolen from him.

He did not sign the Texas… pic.twitter.com/vqjkBScq3A

— Joey Mannarino (@JoeyMannarinoUS) October 18, 2023

Right now there are two paths forward for the GOP in the Speaker battle:

1) Elect Rep. Jim Jordan Speaker of the House, an actual conservative who already has support from most of the Republican conference, as well as the voters, and get back to doing what Americans elected a…

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) October 18, 2023

The post It’s Republicans That Are Preventing Jim Jordan From Becoming Speaker appeared first on Granite Grok.