Looking at a recent installment in Judy Aron’s series of posts about ‘What we learned from this week’s House session’, it occurs to me that it would be nice if instead of trying to make sure the gun is pointed in ‘the right direction,’ Republicans would focus on unloading it, and even disassembling it.

That is if they would live up to their claim to be the party of smaller government instead of the party of righter government.

To take just two of many examples from the post:

(1) Why is the state involved in marriage at all? Anything that can be accomplished with marriage (sharing of assets and custody, power of attorney over medical decisions, and so on) can be accomplished without it, with one exception: There are situations that involve taking money from some people (who are judged to have a surplus) to give it to other people (who are judged to have a need, or just an entitlement) that can’t be exploited without marriage.

In other words, we have made marriage a gateway to participation in certain Marxist redistribution schemes. When you get married, you commit taxpayers to your future support in various situations.  So suddenly, they have to be concerned about who can or can’t line up at the trough.

If we just eliminate the schemes themselves, there would be no reason to fight over marriage. It would be a completely private affair, a commitment that two (or more) people make to each other, and no one’s business but their own.

(2)  Why is the state involved in sports at all? It’s because sports are one more thing that we drag under the umbrella labeled ‘school’, so that parents can have their children’s hobbies subsidized by everyone else. That means taxes are involved, and that turns sports into a branch of politics.

Get sports out of schools, and who plays on what teams is no longer a subject for politics, but something that is determined by the choices of individual athletes and their parents.

This seems to be the GOP playbook: Set up state control over an institution or activity where it is inappropriate to begin with, and then spend eternity fighting over whose ideology should be imposed on that one-size-must-now-fit-all situation.

That’s what we learn at every week’s House session.

The post What We Learn at EVERY Week’s House Session appeared first on Granite Grok.

Watching enormous crowds of Americans shouting blatantly racist chants in support of an agenda that is unapologetically genocidal, and backed by internationally recognized terrorist organizations – met with at best indifference and at worst the active support of our elite institutions of government, news media, education, and entertainment — I can’t help but think, this is what it must have been like in the 1920s when 30,000 members of the Ku Klux Klan proudly marched through Washington and everyone was like, okay!

Yes, Covid masks and keffiyehs have replaced pointy white hoods and robes as the face-hiding fashion signal of the day, and this generation of disruptive bigots is primarily out to get the Jews, not African Americans (so I guess in that sense more akin to Nazis than Klansmen), but the psychology behind their statements are pretty much the same.

They say they just want peace, but… yeah… no. If they really wanted peace, they wouldn’t just be calling for Israel to cease fire, but also for Hamas to cease fire, maybe return the 130 remaining hostages they took in their October 7 massacre (or at least the ones they haven’t murdered yet), stop using Gaza as a launch pad for sending missiles into Tel Aviv, and how about recognizing Israeli Jews’ right to, you know, exist.

They say they support the Palestinian people and their right to self-determination, but… yeah… no. If that’s really what they cared about they would be cheering on Israel’s efforts to eradicate Hamas – the terrorist organization that was elected to rule Gaza in 2005, has refused to hold another democratic election since, and absconded with billions in foreign aid, leaving the Palestinian people living in poverty and oppression under an anti-women’s- rights, anti-gay-rights, openly racist, violent, theocratic tyranny.

They say they’re horrified by war crimes against civilians taking place, but… yeah… no. Targeting civilians for murder by rape like Hamas did; that’s an actual war crime. Using civilians as human shields as Hamas does; that’s an actual war crime. Conducting military operations out of hospitals and schools as Hamas does; also an actual war crime. Shooting your own people when they try to heed advanced warnings by Israel to evacuate targeted areas; not 100% sure on this one, but probably an actual war crime.

They say they’re opposed genocide, but… yeah… no. If you’re chanting “from the river to the sea…” and sporting a “final solution” sign (see photo below from DC, credit New York Post), you’re advocating FOR genocide. Actual genocide. Nazi-style, kill-all-the-Jews genocide. Not the tragic collateral damage inevitable in war, but as-defined-by-the-UN “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group” genocide.

You students setting up tents at Middlebury and UVM are not on the right side of history. You’re on the same side of history as the folks the world executed for crimes against humanity at Nuremberg, and the one who beat us to it by blowing his own brains out in a bunker in April 1945.

This kind of pathogenic societal behavior is what we were supposed to never forget. Not only have we forgotten, but the adults in our classrooms are TEACHING our children and young adults to think and act this way. Many of our elected officials are encouraging it. Others are kowtowing to it. (Looking at you, Bernie, Peter and Becca!) And, frighteningly, it seems they have succeeded to such a degree that this kind of activity is now considered respectably normal.

Which gets me back to my opening thought about the Klan in the 1920s, and an interesting article from NPR (ironically now on board with the “from the river to the sea” crowd) back in 2015 titled, “When The KKK Was Mainstream.” It describes the scene,

In the 1920s, membership in the KKK reached several million people…. And in communities where the KKK really took root, “this meant that a very sizable part of the eligible population was in the Klan.” The KKK was even successful at “block recruiting” of whole clubs or congregations at one time.

And the Klan insinuated itself into otherwise polite society. There were KKK public initiations in many states — including California, Alabama, Oklahoma and Texas — and KKK public parades in Florida, Oregon, Tennessee and other states.

The article gives example after example of how openly proud Klan members were elected to public office, held pageants, sponsored youth baseball teams, and engaged in everything from sewing clubs to agricultural societies, all while “their main leaders promoted expulsion and economic retribution against their ‘enemies.” Of course, what made this grotesque facet of our history possible was the fact that the morality behind it was sadly generally accepted. If you weren’t a member of the KKK, at least you tolerated what they were doing. Or, if you were opposed, you were probably too intimidated to speak out.

The author of the article concluded, “How strange and scary and dangerous those times must have been, when large numbers of Klanspeople paraded around, draped in white robes and sinister ideology,” and too often resorting to violence and intimidation to get their way. Strange, scary, and dangerous indeed. Kinda like what we’re seeing on campuses today, and on blocked roads leading to major airports and bridges, ringed outside politicians’ homes, etc. Let’s not let it happen again.

 

Rob Roper is a freelance writer with 20 years of experience in Vermont politics, including three years of service as chair of the Vermont Republican Party and nine years as President of the Ethan Allen Institute, Vermont’s free-market think tank. He is also a regular contributor to VermontGrok.

The post Night Cap: The New Klan with a Nazi Twist appeared first on Granite Grok.

Now comes Appellant Daniel Richard pro se in his sur-reply to the supplemental briefs of Respondents, the Town of Auburn, and the state of NH.

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT
No. 2023-0097
Daniel Richard v. Christopher Sununu, et al.

Federal Issues

The Defendants have chosen not to answer or deny Appellants claims that the enactment and enforcement of the state statutory scheme violated his rights to due process and equal protection under the 14th Amendment as raised at the start. Therefore, at law they are presumed true and admitted as fact.

It is un-disputed fact that the statutory scheme (Count II – Count VI) controls the local, State, and Federal elections; Therefore, federal laws apply to this case. The United States Supreme Court (hereinafter “SCOTUS”) established precedent in (Smiley v. Holm, 285 U.S. 355, (1932), recently reinforced and cited by Moore v. Harper et al. (2023).) previously detailed in late authorities (filed Aug. 14, 2023) and Memorandum of law (filed April 24, 2024).

Smiley had taxpayer standing as a “citizen, elector and taxpayer of the state” under Article 1. Section 4 to challenge the due process violations of the Minnesota legislature’s redistricting efforts. Based on an Act of Congress June 18, 1929, Mr. Smiley appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court, and he ultimately prevailed on appeal to SCOTUS in 1932. Quoting Mr. Chief Justice Hughes:

“This suit was brought by the petitioner as a “citizen, elector and taxpayer of the state” to obtain a judgment declaring invalid all fillings for nomination for the office of representative in Congress, which should designate a subdivision of the state as a congressional district, and to enjoin the Secretary of State from giving notice of the holding of elections for that office in such subdivisions.” (1932)

Smiley v. Holm Court reaffirmed the constitutional fact that a citizen, elector and taxpayer of a state has constitutional standing under Article 1. Section 4 of the U.S. Const. to bring suit in State and Federal Court to obtain a judgment declaring an Act of a state legislature affecting the time, place and manner of federal elections contrary and repugnant to the State or Federal constitutions and void ab initio.

The Moore court and the line of decisions SCOTUS relied upon, all deal with the enactment of law and procedural due process violations by state legislatures. In all cases the question for review is: Did the state legislature act within the scope of its delegated powers when performing its law-making duties under Article 1. Section 4 Time, Place and Manner for conducting federal elections?

Smiley and Moore decisions are about redistricting. Like gerrymandering, the present claim of vote dilution is also labeled “speculative” but it is speculative only as to potential fraud operations, and not dissimilar from the effect of gerrymandering – which occurs for the purpose of altering election results. For example, the tally of all absentee ballots – if not properly verified (by the local official assigned to that task in the state constitution) means that illegally deposited votes will be included and counted. That process of counting any and all votes in the machine constitutes ‘legalized’ ballot box stuffing. But Smiley and Moore, et.al. confirm the umbrella of standing to be “all acting within the scope of delegated power while performing ….”. It is no more reason to deny judicial review in this case, than a courts review of the legislative process enabling gerrymandering.

The Moore Court defined states’ legislative duties to include other legislature responsibilities besides redistricting. Moore citing Smiley:

“By fulfilling their constitutional duty to craft the rules governing federal elections, state legislatures do not consent, ratify, or elect—they make laws. Elections are complex affairs, demanding rules that dictate everything from the date on which voters will go to the polls to the dimensions and font of individual ballots. Legislatures must “provide a complete code for congressional elections,” including regulations “relati[ng] to notices, registration, supervision of voting, protection of voters, prevention of fraud and corrupt practices, counting of votes, duties of inspectors and canvassers, and making and publication of election returns.” (Emphasis Added).

Under Smiley, the following duties of the state legislature are subject to judicial scrutiny by this Court and fall within the enumerated categories such as “dimensions and font of individual ballots,” “registration,” “supervision of voting,” “protection of voters,” “prevention of fraud and corrupt practices,” “counting votes,” “duties of inspectors,” and “making and publication of election returns.”

Constitutional Limits

Defendants failed to establish any valid constitutional power or lawful authority to exercise un-delegated powers. This is strictly political statutory tactic, for the new election ballot-counting schemes. The N.H. Constitution is a social contract enacted in 1784. See State v. Express Co., 60 N.H. 219, (1880), cited 69 times in state law, including the Clairmont decision, it provides:

The bill of rights is a bill of their equal, private rights, reserved by the grantors of public power. The reservation precedes the grant. Before they create the power of proportional taxation in the fifth article, and the supreme legislative first article, they lay the foundation, and therein reserve those personal liberties, which, upon the evidence of history and their own experience, they think cannot safely be surrendered to government. The definition of taxation, given in the foundation, is taken from books with which the leading statesmen of the Revolution were familiar. …

Government, says the bill of rights, is “instituted for the general good,” “for the common benefit, protection, and security of the whole community.” Arts. 1, 10. “Every member of the community has a right to be protected by it in the enjoyment of his life, liberty, and property. He is therefore bound to contribute his share in the expense of such protection.” Art. 12. Upon every member of the community is laid a constitutional obligation to contribute his share of public expense. ” … The reason is given. He is entitled to the common benefit, protection, and security for which government is instituted; he has a right to be protected in the enjoyment of life, liberty, and property: “he is therefore bound to contribute his share” of the expense. The right of benefit and protection, and the duty of contribution are reciprocal. The former is the consideration for the latter. The latter is the price of the former. 

In other words, this constitutional language about taxation means the people have reserved unto themselves “all government of right originates from the people, founded in consent,” (namely, the amendment process) …; and Part I, art. 8 provide “all power residing originally in, and being derived from the people,” cannot be repealed or altered without the consent of the inhabitants (Part II, art. 100.). The last sentence of the N.H. Const. of 1784 reads: “provided that no alteration shall be made in this constitution before the same shall be laid before the towns and unincorporated places, and approved by two-thirds of the qualified voters present, and voting on the question.”

Part I, art. 1 and Part II, art. 100. (amendment process) are some of the protections guaranteed by the N.H. Const. Part I, art. 12, Taxation and Protection are reciprocal. In exchange for paying your fair share of the expense for such protection. Some of the consideration guaranteed to the inhabitants for paying taxes is detailed in these two clauses… First:

“But no part of a man’s property shall be taken from him, or applied to public uses, without his consent, or that of the representative body of the people.”

The second part of the sentence restricts the manner in which state taxes can be levied. Part I, art. 12. Second: “and Part 1, Article 12 which forbids any tax statute which requires any taxpayer to pay more than his fair share of the tax burden?” Allene V. City of Portsmouth No. 6949. 114 N.H. 573 (1974)

This essential taxpayer element of the state constitution making privileges reciprocal duties, cannot be overruled or ignored by a series of new slippery-slope legislative voting statutes. See, Boody v. Watson, decided in December, 1886:

“The public right of enforcing a taxpayer’s obligation to contribute his share of public expense is created by a legislative division of the common burden in execution of the social contract, and not by a judicial assessment.”

“The right of every citizen that his property shall not be taken by the state under the name of a tax except in pursuance of authorizing statutes is not only affirmed by the common law, but is secured to him by the express terms of the constitution. The bill of rights (Art. 28) declares that “no subsidy, charge, tax, impost, or duty shall be established, fixed, laid, or levied, under any pretext whatsoever, without the consent of the people or their representatives in the legislature, or authority derived from that body.”

Part I, art. 12 guarantees taxpayers due process of law in order to alter the manner in which the people are to be subject to taxes or laws. Such changes to taxes can only be altered in the by manner provided for by art. 12. in exchange for paying taxes. One way is to amend the Const. to grant more taxing power to the legislature, or by those powers already delegated to the legislature in Part I, art. 28. and Part II, art. 5 for paying taxes.

and the Second clause:

“Nor are the inhabitants of this State controllable by any other laws than those to which they, or their representative body, have given their consent.” 

Under the recent SCOTUS precedent in Bruen, and Moore decisions, this Court must examine the plain text of art. 12 and its historical application established in 1784.

The first part states, “Nor are the inhabitants of this State controllable by any other laws than those to which they …”. Who? The inhabitants. (Part I, art. 11. Part II, art. 30) of this State.”

The second part is a command that establishes that the inhabitants of this State are not controllable by “any other laws” than those which they (again, the inhabitants) …

And the third part: or “their representative body (Part II, art. 100-the amendment process)” after the fourth part is completed

The fourth part: [inhabitants] “have given their consent.” Part I, art. 1. and Part II, art. 100. These four parts clarify that at stake in this case is the private right of the Appellant, not the public right of the state. Part I, art. 12 established taxpayer standing (1784), as the plain text prohibits Part II the government, from making any other laws (including election laws) not founded upon constitutional authority and from altering or amending the Const. of N.H. without the consent of the inhabitants, who have reserved this power to themselves. (Part I, art.1, Part II, art. 100). Such acts as Appellant complained (namely the statutory voting and vote counting schemes denying him equal protection and due process at law) are prohibited by, Part I, art. 12 and the due process clause of the 14th Amendment.

Therefore, in exchange for an inhabitant’s paying a fair share of the expense of such protection, the legislature cannot enact any legislation that is contrary or repugnant to other provisions in the state constitution. Const. of N.H. Part II, art. 5 as such acts are also prohibited by Part II. Art. 5 as follows: “That clause, which confers upon the ‘general court’ the authority ‘to make laws’, provides at the same time that they must not be ‘repugnant or contrary to the constitution….’” Id. 210, Merrill v. Sherburne, (1818)

Defendants have exercised what they call “permissible legislative judgment” from the beginning of this case and repeatedly violated this constitutional restraint – that they believe they may act where they believe the Const. of N.H. is silent, while never establishing any history, custom or law that would permit such ultra vires actions. As such, those ultra vires acts are de facto repugnant and contrary to the state constitution.

Under our constitutional form of government, Part II the Form of Government can only exercise those powers specifically delegated to them by the Const. of N.H. The power to enact laws cannot be assumed or delegated or contrived by politicians and the legislature, (as Defendants repeatedly have done before and throughout this case as recently as weeks ago, pending appeal.) Until this court rules, state politicians continue to act in an ongoing attempt to manipulate the voting process to alter election outcomes in a manner that is repugnant to the Constitution.  But all governmental powers (Part I, art. 1. art.8 art. 10. art. 12. Part II, art. 100) must be derived from the consent of the inhabitants of this State. Thus, the people retained their sovereignty in the face of even ongoing blatant political overreach to alter and control the election process.  See Part I, art. 7.

The Appellant moves the Court to take judicial notice, that the state’s attorneys made material mis-representation of Appellant tax-payer standing status in this case, by repeatedly claiming Defendant lacks standing to raise the case. (pg. 19. Item II, Defend.’s Supplement Brief). Such a claim misleads and deflects accountability for repeated State Actor violations leading to present and future injury and harm.

The Appellant claimed Part I, Art. 12 as one of his rights from the beginning of this case, establishing constitutional standing as a citizen, as an inhabitant and as a tax-payer. Appellant cited these proper elements of standing from the beginning. See standing issues addressed at pages 9, 10, 12, 16, 17, 18, 24, 27, 33, 37, 40, 46, and in his Motion to Reconsider at page 9. Throughout the appeal process, Appellant cited the Const. of N.H. Part I. Art. 12 that taxation and protection are and have been reciprocal (since 1784) for constitutional standing.

Injuries

The Town of Auburn de facto deferred briefing any statutory schema issues throughout the pendency of this case in deference to the State’s Attorney’s until now.

Now, it submits a 2,911-word brief in response to the open solicitation for Amicus curie or memoranda. From the beginning, it failed to deny and answer all details of March 9, 2022 as detailed in Appellant’s Complaint (pg. 10, 11, 12, items 27—4), and it is right and fair that all facts plead by Appellant be accepted as fair and accurate descriptions of injury for purposes of this appeal.

As a result of this Court’s decision in Richard v. Speaker (2022) the legislature is now emboldened that it no longer has a constitutional duty to hear Appellant’s ‘petition’ or ‘remonstrance’ for relief (under Part I, art. 32) including a remonstrance filed regarding this new statutory scheme. See Remonstrance dated Feb. 24, 2022, @ complaint Exhibit B. (dismissed).

All Defendants were noticed, prior to the March 8, 2022 election day. It’s an undisputed fact the Town of Auburn claimed as their defense that the e-mail from the Secretary of State’s Office (Asst. Sec. of State Karen Ladd) (cited as exhibit D in the complaint), which instructed the Town to use voting machines. Atty. Tierney conceded the point that he told Town Election official to enforce the statutory scheme and use only voting machines, after notice.

Fundamentally Defendant’s brief confesses to the underlying issue. On March 9, 2022, the Town did not have a hand count policy and relied on the state’s statutory scheme to use voting machines to count all ballots. Appellant was deprived of his right to a constitutionally fair vote. The non and unconstitutional voting process, was not only illegal, but potentially fraudulent vote manipulation. The Town would only count Appellants ballot if he used the voting machine to count his ballot.

Defendant’s current position is to cure the injury. That the Town adopted a new hand count policy. This non-uniform, manner for sorting, verifying and counting all ballots is un-equal. The adaptation of a hand count policy provided a separate box in which to deposit his ballot. This adds further layers of safety, security, and equality questions about secrecy of his ballot or that his ballot was counted at all. Defective remedy is not adequate remedy to address any harm, injury, and other concerns raised in improper legislative usurpation of the constitutional process in this case. Why would the Town provide a remedy to the problem if the Appellant had no right to have his ballot properly counted by the moderator and not an electronic voting machine?

Relief

Appellant respectfully requests the following:

1. The moderator (or his deputies) of the Town of Auburn shall sort and hand count and verify all ballots as provided for in Part II, art. 32 and not by machine.

2. The moderators in all towns, cities or unincorporated places in this State, shall “sort” and “count” ballots in an equal manner provided in Part II, art. 32. (1784) by hand, and not by a machine (1979).
3. No voting machines means Count III is moot, as the safety of voting machines is longer an issue if not used.
4. The legislature shall return to the word and voter requirements as “inhabitant” as the definition of a qualified voter unless and until properly voted upon to amend the state constitution.
5. The legislature shall only provide for absentee voting as prescribed in Part I, art. 11, for those inhabitants who are absent from their voting district, or they are un-able to vote in person because of a disability. Each absentee application and ballot shall properly comply with affidavit/notary requirements, and envelopes shall be properly verified and retained also as constitutionally provided. No votes not so affirmed and properly delivered shall be counted.

6. The Court shall again declare that the 1976 ballot question 8 b) and all of its amendment achieved under question 8, are void ab initio; and legislature shall restore past, present, and future election statutes to be in harmony with the state constitution and its pre-amendment status prior to 1976.
7. And for such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

Respectfully submitted,

Daniel Richard

/s/ Daniel Richard

Read or download as a PDF

The post Daniel Richard v. Christopher Sununu, et al. – SUR-REPLY TO RESPONDENTS BREIFS appeared first on Granite Grok.

It should be a maxim of our Constitutional Republic and inculcated into the collective consciousness that thou shalt not let legislators vote hastily on bills in response to current events. They almost always waste money, infringe on rights, or produce lousy laws, and the Antisemitism Awareness Act is an example of this bad idea.

Listen to the voiceover.

https://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Antisemitism-awareness-act.mp3

In response to the recent on-campus nonsense the U.S. House of Representatives has found something upon which a majority of them agree. The “unrest” is an opportunity to suppress constitutionally protected speech.

The Antisemitism Awareness Act (H.R. 6090) passed 320-91, not because it is good law or necessary for public interest or safety, but because it gives the appearance of doing something. Doing what?

How about shutting down debate.

“Students,” – and there are credible claims of organized outside action using the campus environment to advance other aims – are saying mean things about Jews. Yes, there is some violence, but we already have laws to address that. Most colleges, college towns, cities, and states have laws elevating punishments for actual crimes if the prosecutor can prove someone was motivated by hate. Those are bad laws, but their proliferation has skewed law and lawmaking, and The Antisemitism Awareness Act is an example of this.

It requires the Department of Education to use the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance working definition of antisemitism when enforcing federal anti-discrimination laws. The working definition says antisemitism is in-part “a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews.” The definition includes denying Jewish people their right to self-determination by claiming that the State of Israel is a racist state and drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.

Detractors take issue with narrowing the definition. I take issue with the entire exercise. Discriminatory speech in the public square is protected speech. The umbrella (regardless of size) under which any individual or group might label words or ideas as hate speech is still protected speech.

It is still protected First Amendment expression.

But It’s Mean!

Saying mean things is not a crime; just check social media or go outside. People can be jerks; it’s annoying and distracting, sometimes amusing, and at other times an opportunity to make a point, but it is not a crime.

Mean+action is already a crime (depending on the action). Incitement to violence is a crime. Libel and Slander are crimes.

These restrictions are narrow to ensure the government does not infringe on protected speech or is encouraged to do so by any individual, group, 50.1% of a mob, or well-meaning legislators.

We’re not supposed to like it, but disagreeing is the point.

Shouting “From the River to the Sea” is loaded with sinister connotations, but it is protected speech. Calling for any “cleansing”-be it ethnic, religious, tribal, or ideological is offensive and evil, but unless you are organizing to do it or actually caught doing it (or trying to do it), that can be proven in a court of law, saying it is protected speech.

That will offend some, but the alternative is more offensive to human liberty. It opens the door to further meddling and redefining of things that inevitably protect government abuse and people in power at the expense of natural human rights.

Check Out Steve’s Substack Then There’s The Other Exception-alism

We hear talk, especially from the political right, about American Exceptionalism. Anyone anywhere, regardless of any demographic characteristic, can work hard and succeed. They can define what success means to them and feel content when they reach it. It can and is different for each of us, and as long as the opportunity to define your success is protected, anyone should be able to seek it. It has allowed the American experiment to lift more people out of poverty than any system of government yet known.

This is not the limit of what could be considered, but it is exceptional in these respects.

Along comes H.R. 6090. Let’s say it becomes law and survives Constitutional scrutiny. What happens when we elect a Jewish president? Are students no longer permitted to object based on the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s working definition of antisemitism (and that will change in response to the law at the behest of people looking to suppress speech)?

Will the imposition of this legislation affect students’ ability to object to Jewish members of Congress for fear of running afoul? What about its application at the local level?

Will or could The Federal Department of Education migrate these restrictions into the Public Schools, holding funding hostage in exchange for compliance?

Given that (theoretical) success, why would they stop at alleged Antisemitism? Doesn’t every other “group” deserve similar protection in the name of equity? And why are we restricting this to college campuses? Let’s let it roam free, a chilling silence following in its wake.

Lessons Not Learned?

The oppressive response to COVID lingers, but humans are quick to forget. Given the opportunity, those in elected office at every level were quick to abuse their authority. Constitutionally protected rights were jabbed, masked, and distanced. Stuffed in the trunk and told to shut up. That was because we let it happen. Towns, Cities, Counties, and states had (over the years) crafted for themselves loopholes, none of which should have stood up to constitutional scrutiny when applied. When the time came, suppressing rights took precedence. People lost jobs, businesses, livelihoods, friends, and the right to speak and associate freely. Prohibitions of warrantless search were abridged.

The courts were not much help, and since they are part of the government, why should they?

In the Movie Field of Dreams, the voice whispers build it, and they will come. COVID taught us, shouted from every corner of our lives, that if the government can abuse it, it will. If we let them make it, they will beat us with it.

H.R. 6090 has been collecting dust since it was introduced last October, a few weeks after October 7th.

Not long after the ‘campus protests’ started – whose origin may not be entirely organic – it got fast-tracked.

You’d be right to question everything while you still can.

 

The post Your Government is Using Campus Protests and “Anti-Semitism” to Suppress Free Speech appeared first on Granite Grok.

Editor: Allison has been busy posting more stuff than we’ve delegated space to share each week. You can always check it out here without any promotion from us. I know she’ll appreciate it.

Women are more than Roe

!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u359331"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");

Rumble("play", {"video":"v4qjzkf","div":"rumble_v4qjzkf"});

 

Next: Obamacare for hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants

!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u359331"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");

Rumble("play", {"video":"v4qklhu","div":"rumble_v4qklhu"});

The post Elections have Consequences: “Women are More Than Roe” & “Obamacare for Hundreds of Thousands of Illegal Migrants’ appeared first on Granite Grok.

My reps and two-time opponents, Comrades Mr & Mrs Newman, have a history of ignoring emails. Normally, I don’t email them, but my personal email history with them started in October 2021 following the executive council arrests. With them and the Damn Emperor being on opposite sides of the aisle (on paper, at least), I mistakenly thought conversation could be had about that incident.

I even followed up about a week or two later to no avail.  Then several months later, my help was requested in a project to email reps about a secession-related bill.  I pointed out to the presently embattled project manager how misrepresented I am in the House, but I was still encouraged to do so just the same in order to go on record.  I agreed and was ignored by the Newmans though Comrade Mrs Newman has said “hi” to me in person a few times, both at the archives and the state house dining room.

Since the Parental Bill of Rights was/is a flagship issue in the legislature, I wanted to play the good soldier and do my part even though I don’t have kids.  This issue, after all, is about my fellow teammates’ most precious commodity, their kids.  “Kids are the future,” we all hear, and therefore everyone’s kids are MY future.  Game on!  However, I chose to retool my subject line.  Instead of “vote yes on SB 272,” I crafted a title that didn’t include HB or SB or yes or no.  I called it a civics message and sent it to all 3 of my reps.  This was in the spring of last year and one of them, Linda Ryan, is a freshman.  Linda was obviously not yet “schooled” by the Newmans on ignoring emails and replied-all rather promptly with a friendly though uncommitted answer.  I’m sure Comrade Mrs. Newman was not pleased and later gave Linda a talking-to in private, but Mrs. Newman replied-all after Linda’s reply with a polite but useless answer.  I replied all, thanking both of them for their answers and offering additional talking points, and pointing out that I hadn’t yet received a reply from Comrade Mr Newman.  He has never replied to any of my emails, ever.

So here we are with the repackaged SB341 now in the House and I did my duty in emailing all 3 of them on 4/24 the following words:

As parents, you most certainly wouldn’t appreciate being lied to, especially by faculty and staff of schools your kids attended.  And I give your kids the benefit of the doubt that they wouldn’t want that either with your grandchildren yet you voted the wrong way last year on both HB 10 and SB 272.
As your constituent and per Article 32 of the NH Constitution, I am giving you instructions to vote OTP on SB 341.  Please do a good turn and vote in a manner that actually represents Ward 2 parents instead of the bidding of the NTU.

And I received a reply from Comrade Mrs Newman one week later, saying the following: Hi Julie –  Thanks for the email. Looks like we’re going to  have to agree to disagree on this bill, though.    Sue 

The Newmans are Bloomberg-funded staunch gun grabbers.  He’s on the Criminal Justice committee, which receives all gun bills, and she’s on Public Works but attends all gun bill hearings, often speaking anti-gun rhetoric into the mic while her muzzled husband listens from the head table.  If you look up their NH dot gov home pages, you will see that they’re family people; parents and grandparents.  I will also add that one or both of them were on the school board before becoming reps.  Another one of their constituents, Alderman Dowd, also came from that very same body.  It’s a cultivating ground for higher office evil that ails Nashua.

Considering that many swamp rats everywhere in a variety of offices just stay there until death occurs, I sadly don’t see them returning to private citizenry anytime soon.  So why repeat the same unproductive behavior (emailing them the ordinary way) and expect different results?  Einstein wouldn’t.  As Dinosaur D’Allesandro, a senate example of what I just noted, told the media about Defend the Guard, “It’s going to just keep on coming up, over and over again, in the future.”  The same can be said about parental rights and guns, so both issues should be fused together when emailing Comrade Mrs. Newman, who is clearly the Ward 2 Alpha swamp rat.  She needs to be asked, in your own words, if she would still support school secrecy to parents if their inquiries were gun-related.

The post What if Parents ask Gun-Related Questions, Comrade Mrs Newman? appeared first on Granite Grok.

If you search the site for EVs or Electric Vehicles, you’ll find every reason not to buy one, and thankfully, we’re not the only ones pointing it out. EV sales are lousy in the US, which has to be why Democrat states are looking to ban gas-powered cars.

They want you on an EV bus, a bicycle, walking, or better yet – living on an urban heat island confined to quarters. If you live under that yoke, here’s a reminder of why you need to make a change politically – if you still can.

EVs have a short shelf life compared to other vehicles. Whatever the battery warranty is, that’s it. It’s over. No one is going to buy it used; it is almost worthless as a trade-in. Given how much shorter this life span can be compared to a more affordable combustion engine vehicle (assuming you didn’t crash your EV and have to scrap it sooner), you will need another car. If you are an EV-tard, that’ll mean another whole-vehicle carbon footprint before its time and a repeat of what you just went through.

If you buy a used EV and the car is over five years old (Don’t do it!), You can expect to spend two to three times its value to replace the battery pack, which has been losing range rapidly since you bought it. You might get a few years out of it.

In other words, never buy a used EV. Just don’t do it. Here’s an example of the problem and why internal combustion engine vehicles are irreplaceable (disregarding the reality that EV trucks, tractors, and other heavy equipment will never be EV on this technology)

Take a new petrol-driven Renault Clio — it costs around £20,000, while its all-electric opposite, the Renault Zoe, costs closer to £30,000.

While you can drive a traditional petrol or diesel car for around 200,000 miles over 14 years before the engine needs fixing or replacing, by comparison a new EV is typically guaranteed under a warranty for 100,000 miles over eight years.

Should your petrol engine need replacing you can expect to pay around £5,000, but replace the battery on your EV outside warranty and you’re looking at an eye-watering £13,000 to £40,000, depending on the make of your car, if you fit a manufacturer’s new unit.

And there are external factors at play with battery degradation — including use of fast chargers and even a colder climate.

The high cost of EV batteries is a result of it being difficult to mine metals such as nickel, cobalt, lithium and manganese that are used in the lithium-ion batteries.

They are also in demand for the production of other electronics, including mobile phones and laptops.

In the most extreme cases, such as with a 12-year-old Nissan Leaf that cost £2,000 to buy, you can pay as much as £24,000 for a brand-new replacement 24kWh battery.

In contrast, for reasons that include auto-makers losing money on just about every EV they sell, which is recouped in the cost of combustion engine vehicles, everyday used cars might, for the first time in my life, be worth more than you paid for them. As in, you bought it a few years back, and it is worth more today. True story. Dealers are crying to buy your used vehicles. If you purchased it used and took care of it, it could be worth more than you paid.

We can thank Barry and the Democrats (Cash for Clunkers), the Biden EV mandate threats and the Gavin Nuiesce acolytes in states chasing the net-zero lie. Shutting down the global supply chain didn’t help (or should I say help?). Outsourcing so much of what we ought to be doing here played a hand, especially when the supply chain got bent sideways. All of which has made EVs more expensive as well.

They cost more, do less, and are worth less. That reminds me of a slogan I crafted to describe the Democrat Party.

I think I’ll take another stab at that.

To be fair, there is one bright note about the used EV problem. Maybe it is cheaper to buy used EVs, drive them for a year or two, and when the battery can no longer get you out of your driveway, get another. They should be cheap. But as with the solar panel and wind turbine end-of-life problem, you might find the cost to scrap it is another expense no one bothered to tell you about.

The post As If You Needed Another Reason to Stay The Hell Away From Electric Vehicles appeared first on Granite Grok.

Jessica Grill is a State Rep who nominally represents Ward 12 in Manchester. While some of her fellow Democrat Woke-Communist State Reps appear preoccupied with defending Hamas, Grill … who seemingly either wants to be or actually is a thirteen-year-old who lives in and on TikTok … seems preoccupied with having sex with older men.

Allow me to translate Grill’s child-speak.

DILF means Dad-I’d-Like-To-F*ck … mfs means mother-f*ckers … dee dee blanchard refers to a mentally ill woman who abused her daughter (in other words, parents who want to know what is going on in the public schools are mentally ill and dangerous to their own children) … zaddies means a sexually attractive older man.

Jessica Grill’s vulgarity and preoccupation with sex say more about the voters in Ward 12 and the sad state of the NHGOP than it does about Grill. Her teen-slang schtick is tragicomic. At best, the voters in Ward 12 are ignorant and apathetic. And as for the NHGOP … how do you possibly lose to a candidate who resembles a caricature of a thirteen-year-old addicted to TikTok?

The post Jessica Grill … The TikTok-Democrat State Rep “Representing” Manchester Ward 12 appeared first on Granite Grok.

Most can guess who I am referring to; yes, this will be about Donald J. Trump. But before dismissing this read, try asking yourself one question. What’s more important, your animosity towards the man or our country’s survival?

What awaits this November is no longer about politics but about our Country’s actual continuance. Therefore, this situation calls for a capable and forceful leader but, above all, a loyal leader, not some vote-seeking glib mouthpiece who has never cashed a working man’s check!

We’ve all heard those expressing their displeasure over President Trump’s occasional response, of which even I have, at times, felt he might have been more tempered. However, everyone owns their personality, temperament, quirks, and irks. We humans are all different and individually unique with our separate ways and mannerisms. Given the seriousness of today, what lasting benefit comes from hearing a politician’s pleasing promises yet avoiding taking a stand on important issues?

Contrary to his occasional gruff words, there’s also a charm that the American voter instantly recognized and latched onto. He doesn’t bloviate! He spoke and still speaks the same message and in every day language, maybe a bit harsh but always what is needed to be said and heard. A perfect example was his appeal to minorities, “what have you got to lose?” This style of communicating works, which is why it’s not part of any political science coarse!

True leadership remains uncaring as to whether feelings may be hurt. This fact may unsettle some, but sensitivities are antithetical to an effective, inspiring, and worthy leader. So, when continuing with this anti-Trump drumbeat rather than applauding his peace-producing and productive record, it only reflects back upon the naysayers. This approach, choosing stubbornness rather than forgiveness, also challenges its Biblical quality defined as being Divine.

A by-product, which for understandable reasons never gets air time, is that from these eight-plus accusatory years of Trump bashing, an intimidation element has been introduced into our supposed free elections! The democrats have greatly narrowed the candidate field simply from their free wheeling of criminal charges, which are intended to occupy Trump’s campaign days while also draining his funds. Who, other than another billionaire, can follow in Trump’s MAGA footstep which has protected and provided our country with her legally scripted and proven venue? As such, America’s free elections are fading as they now resemble what in the trades is known as “a closed shop.”

Another particular of Trump questions the “hows” and “whys” that spur such a successful and affluent man to set aside all his deserved luxuries that so many of us strive to obtain in order to serve and better the country he so dearly loves. And now, he has signed up for another salary-donating hitch! So the motive is certainly not money nor is it notoriety. Not intending to further ruffle some of the reader’s feathers but could it be a spiritual calling? What else could fuel such dedication and drive?

Certain happenings occurred during our War for Independence which prompted various Founders to suppose Divine Providence being a factor in America’s quest for freedom. Within “45,” it’s certainly a possibility, at least for some of us to consider, that a celestial influence could provide his inner strength for withstanding what most would and could not endure.

Trump’s words not being part of the usual political jive was and still is another plus that magnetized his support; no, he was not a career politician, nor was he indebted or controlled by anyone. His life and career revolved around and were dependent upon successful deal-making, which also entailed being true to his word. This character trait carried over into his Presidency and has been a building block for amassing this public trust and admiration. In political circles, this didn’t and still doesn’t play well!

To wrap up, and with grateful thanks for Trump’s love and loyalty to our country and her people, America’s wise old sage, Dr. Ben Franklin offers a thought. This slice of wisdom was spoken during our 1787 Constitutional Convention: “I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth – that God Governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid?”

Being in agreement with Dr. Franklin, we might also add that a nation may not fall without His notice and permission! November will answer this, one way or the other!

The post A Tested and Worthy Champion appeared first on Granite Grok.

College students, and trained Marxists, do not just wake up one day illiterate and acting like cult members– they have to be trained. The dumbing down of public education certainly helps sway students to support a political movement like Marxism, especially if they are illiterate in history, and economic systems.

What we are seeing unfolding on college campuses comes as no surprise to me. Both Republicans and Democrats have laid the foundation for this kind of violent revolt. Whether it be BLM, Antifa or the Palestinian protesters, all share common characteristics; illiteracy and support for Marxists ideology.

Most normal people support black lives, do not want to see an unfair advantage among big corporations, and can value the lives of Palestinians and Israelis. But none of that matters to a trained Marxist. They become cult-like in their militant extremist positions.

Where does this all come from?
Why are parents waking up to their kids being arrested, and now part of a militant cult who are willing to use them to benefit Marxist elitists?

Some of this comes directly out of your public schools.
We can see teachers who have posted their propaganda in their classrooms, they don’t even hide it. Removing textbooks and replacing them with electronic devices, has allowed much of this radicalized propaganda in the curriculum, to be hidden from parents. Add social media to the mix, and we have a recipe for creating a dumbed-down illiterate militant Marxist.

Nellie Mae is a ” is a left-of-center nonprofit who is active in New England. Nellie Mae is oriented around furthering critical race theory-aligned policies in the region’s public education system.”

Nellie Mae used to deal primarily with student loans, but over the years, they’ve become more of a militant political organization focused on turning students to become community organizers.

How does Nellie Mae get into the schools? They offer grants to schools which then require schools to fulfill their agenda.

Grantmaking
On January 1, 2020, in order to better serve its new critical race theory-aligned focus, as well as combat “the idea that education can be a great equalizer,” which the organization dubs, “the myth of meritocracy,” the Nellie Mae Education Foundation announced a new grantmaking strategy encompassing six grant funds: “Supporting Organizations Led By People of Color”; “Advancing Community-Led Partnerships,” which supports community-organizations led by minorities; “Amplifying Youth Voice,” which supports student youth groups in New England; “Building Movements and Networks,” which supports networking projects and institutions “elevating the discourse about race”; and “Strengthening State and National Coalitions,” which supports groups advancing critical race theory aligned policies in public education on the state-level.

This is why every school board should be reviewing school grants. They need to see what they’ve sold to the grant foundation. 

Nellie Mae has worked with the New Hampshire Department of Education to promote Competency-Based Education in our public schools. In 2013, with support from the Nellie Mae Education Foundation, the NHDOE designed a performance assessment model. This makes you wonder who’s really running our local public schools.

Here is a link to the notice to the federal government by former Commissioner Virginia Barry.  New Hampshire is required show the Feds on what kind of performance exam we will use in our schools: https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/stateletters/nhassesspaceproposal.pdf

With the generous support from the Nellie Mae Education Foundation, the NHDOE in 2013 constructed a performance assessment model of local accountability to support the implementation of competency education based on the tenets of a white paper completed by the Accountability 3.0 Taskforce of the Innovation Lab Network of the Council of Chief State School Officers, (CCSSO). This model, which laid the foundation for the PACE proposal (see Appendix B), conceptualized a scalable model of state and local accountability supported by common performance assessments juried at the state level and aligned to NH state level graduation competencies in English language arts, mathematics, science, and work study practices.

 

Competency Based Education (CBE) has done nothing to improve academic outcomes, because competencies are focused on changing a child’s values, attitudes and beliefs. Parents may think that their child has mastered Algebra 1 after they’ve completed their competencies, but that couldn’t be further from the truth. Go read them. The focus of CBE isn’t to improve academic outcomes, which might explain why Nellie Mae was so eager to help New Hampshire.

Now there are Social and Emotional Learning Competencies, even though legislators insisted that Competencies NOT evaluate a child’s dispositions. I know, I was at the hearings years ago when CBE was passed into law.

Republicans have been complicit in this education reform because they’ve never done the research. Ask yourself, if CBE is so great, why is it the private schools will not touch it? Why does it have to be forced on schools through a state law?

How do they turn kids into radical community organizers? Here’s one example from the former Asst. Superintendent from Manchester, David Ryan, explaining how they would be turning students into community activists in class. When the students have no idea what they are fighting for on the college campuses, or cannot locate Gaza on a map, you will have a better understanding how they got there.

The former Asst. Superintendent, David Ryan went on to become the Superintendent of SAU16/Exeter for several years. He instituted a focus on Social Justice by hiring a DEIJ Director.  None of this actually helps students learn to read and write, but it does divide students while pushing the students into activism. He’s now taken those talents to Hinsdale, NH.

As an activist myself, I can certainly understand and support anyone actively supporting a political cause; but this isn’t what we are seeing. We are seeing an undermining of our democratic values, and our economic system from young adults who are illiterate in the subjects of history and civics.

We have the best political system in the world because we do not have to resort to violence. We can run for office or vote for a representative who aligns with our values. There is no need to burn down cities like we saw during the Summer of Love when BLM and Antifa teamed up to destroy cities, businesses, and harm anyone who got in their way.

Children writing to their legislators about police brutality, are learning to become political mules for Marxist elitists.

What can you do about this ?
1) Stop ignoring your public schools, you pay for this.
2) Start looking at what’s being taught in the school you pay for.
3) Get involved with your local school board election.
4) Either run for school board, or help get good board members elected.
5) If you are elected, do not cower in the corner, start asking questions.
6) Expose what is going on in the schools.
7) Why are teachers displaying flags from one group while ignoring all of the other students in your district? That’s not inclusive.
8) Keep communicating with your school board and demand that they focus on quality academics vs civics action.

Students in our public schools deserve a quality education, black and brown included.

These kids are not the ideal candidates for a good job in the future. Once a company sees that they’ve been engaged in this fight, they know that kind of employee will eventually take their fight to their employer. That will be come a big problem for those running the company.

This is a big set up for failure, unless you are George Soros.

The post Radical Community Organizers on College Campuses Who Created Them? Connecting Some of the Dots appeared first on Granite Grok.

If you missed it, mostly-rural-Maine has succumbed to the electoral weight of its cities and Left a majority of Democrats running the political store. They assume this means they should advance every nutty progressive thing in case the people come ot their senses. And so they have, no matter what the cost.

The Kittery Trading Post, just over the border in Maine, is a Tourist magnet, but recent changes in State Law would complicate matters and undermine firearms sales.

In a statement, Kittery Trading Post said the law will have “irreversible consequences” for its longstanding outdoor sports retail business, which relies heavily on tourism.

The 72-hour waiting period “forces law-abiding customers” to make two visits over three days to complete a legal firearm sale, with the extra time, gas, and other expenses further driving up costs for the consumer, the company said.

Advertisement

The gun retailer estimated it brings in over $11 million in new and used firearm sales each year and that roughly 60% of those sales are to out-of-state residents.

That’s no small amount of cake.

The store’s announcement follows a statement from Gov. Janet Mills this week that she would let the legislation become law without her signature.

The law, which will take effect 90 days after the Legislature adjourns, likely some time in August,…

I hope they do it. We’d be happy to take them in, and they already have space here.

Kittery Trading Post said that it would move its firearms business to New Hampshire, where it currently has a small gun exchange facility. The Maine store is about 2 miles from the New Hampshire border.

It is yet another unpleasant side-effect of knee-jerk progressive policymaking. Pass a law that will do nothing to improve public safety (that will likely make matters worse) and lose millions in sales and commerce. Maine residents should also know they don’t care—the Democrats in office. Lost jobs and revenue are not part of any such calculus. Disarming you is the priority. Preventing young Mainers from embracing any gun culture that is not anathema to firearms is more important. And since they never cut spending, they’ll tax something else and call you names if you complain.

You voted for it. This is what you get.

The post How Maine Gun Laws Help New Hampshire: Kittery Trading Post Threatens to Move All Firearms Sales to Granite State appeared first on Granite Grok.

Joe Biden is constantly talking about the threat Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans pose to our Democracy. This talk is part of the scare tactics used by all Democrats because there is no way they can run on their record for the last four years. We have been getting graphic visuals of what is happening in America for months, showing Joe Biden’s Democracy at work, and it does not look like any America I want to live in.

From Day One of his administration, our border has been thrown open, and millions of undocumented, unvetted, illegal migrants have come into our country and dispersed throughout the country, making every state a border state. These people are transported to whatever region of the country they desire, regardless of whether the receiving region has the infrastructure and funding available to handle these new residents.

The children of these migrants are putting a burden on every school district they are now attending. Individuals and families are overtaxing the available housing, with some communities building new units to house these migrants at no cost to them but to the taxpayers.

The list of Americans dead from Fentanyl poisoning continues to grow. Over 300,000 during Biden’s term, yet he does not feel an obligation to challenge China or Mexico for their complicity in the manufacture and distribution of Fentanyl, killing Americans in their prime.

Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican candidate and opponent of Joe Biden, faces 91 exaggerated counts in various locations across America. Biden is using his Justice Department as a weapon to interfere with the 2024 election by keeping his number one opponent confined to a courtroom when he should be on the campaign trail and under a bogus gag order in an attempt to silence Trump. The ridiculous fines are an apparent attempt to break the former President or empty his campaign coffers by paying court fees. It is not working, and Trump’s approval rating increases with each sordid twist in these trials.

College campuses around the country are exploding with “peaceful” protests, as Congresswoman Cortez (D-NY) called them, that are anything but peaceful. Mob scenes at Columbia, the University of Oregon, and UCLA turned violent, resulting in conflicts with local and state police. Buildings have been damaged and covered with vulgar graffiti. These illegal encampments have been happening for ten days. Still, finally, on Thursday, Joe Biden made a quick statement describing Freedom of speech versus hate talk or violence but said little about the students and activists claiming freedom of speech but spewing hate speech against Israel and Jews and claiming alliance with the terrorist group Hamas. Police reports indicate that more than one-half of those arrested in these uprisings have no affiliation with the school. This confirms these violent acts were organized and funded by anti-American and anti-Israel activists.

These illegal actions should have been shut down ASAP as they were in Florida or Texas, but Biden ignored the rioting until Day 9 when he finally spoke out but took no questions. Biden’s lack of leadership is consistent with every significant decision or policy of his Presidency. He is always late, weak, and non-specific in his responses, and his staff usually has to clean up the mess he leaves with his comments or reinforce them with what he meant to say.

Joe Biden claims he has brought America back from the turmoil of the Trump Presidency, but you never saw these ugly situations during his term. What we see with our eyes is the real Biden Democracy that he wants to protect. Biden shows by his actions that he does not love this country and wants to complete the transformation of America that started when he was Vice President under President Obama.

The post This Is Joe Biden’s Democracy appeared first on Granite Grok.

I am writing to complain about the restrictive laws which only serve to decrease our recreational use of our parklands. The USDA has enacted laws (ostensibly) to reduce the impact of campers on some (most) areas in the White Mountain Nation Forest.

These include prohibiting camping within ¼ mile of trailheads, roads, most ponds, and some trails. This is excessive and unnecessary.

Someone walking along a trail or driving on the road will not be able to see more than 150 feet into the forest –and will not notice the minimal impact of someone’s tent having been set up even 100 feet from the trail.

We want to thank Paul Hutsteiner for this Contribution – Please direct yours to Steve@GraniteGrok.com.
You can review our ‘Op-Ed Guidelines‘ on the FAQ Page.

Yes more people would visit the White Mountains if they could camp near enough to see at least a glimpse of their car: This is a good thing, it brings in revenue.   And it would in no way affect those people just driving by…

So , after attending the celebration commemorating the Pine Tree Riot this weekend, I am writing this in the spirit of freedom
and the right of all Citizens to get some use out of our nation’s resources – the National Forest.

If anyone has any ideas as to who can I try to contact to get help addressing this issue, please let me know.

The post White Mountains: Let Campers Camp! appeared first on Granite Grok.

A recent poll by Rasmussen/Heartland institute indicates that TWENTY (20) percent of mail-in-votes in 2020 election were fraudulent. A link and some highlights below, but first an(other) admonition … if you think 2024 is going to be different, that 2020 was a one-off, you are DELUSIONAL. To theDemocratsCommunists “democracy” means that they win … no matter what it takes. Wake up, bitter-clingers. Wake the *&^% up.

"One in five mail-in voters admitted to violating election laws in 2020, which should have disqualified their ballots. Further details are even worse." https://t.co/nXIvM3ooTJ

— Ned Ryun (@nedryun) May 1, 2024

The Heartland Institute/Rasmussen survey, which was conducted from Nov. 30 to Dec. 6, asked likely voters who cast ballots in 2020 questions about fraudulent activities, without telling them such actions were a form of voter fraud. The results were stunning. One in five people who voted by mail admitted to engaging in at least one kind of potential voter fraud, seriously calling into question the security of widespread mail-in balloting.

If the recent Heartland Institute/Rasmussen survey is accurate and one in five ballots were, in fact, fraudulent, that would suggest greater than 13 million ballots should not have been counted nationwide in 2020. That’s far more than the margin of victory for President Biden in the popular vote, about 7 million.

 

The post Night Cap: TWENTY (20) Percent Of Mail-In-Votes in 2020 Were Fraudulent appeared first on Granite Grok.

No compilation of urban legends would be complete without mentioning cafeteria-style mystery meat. It is shaped like meat, colored (and cooked) like meat, but would it stand up to even casual scrutiny? Stories about schools saving money by cheating out on food were spurious at best. Schools don’t try to save money.

But if they did, would that be the place?

My memory of school lunch is not unpleasant. The food was food, and I ate burgers and fries almost every day in High School, and I looked forward to it. That was before the advent of fake meat, vegan meat, and the latest carbon and chemically intensive insult to nature, lab-grown meat, or cloned meat (as I like to call it)—something you’d expect in some deep-space dystopian post-apocalyptic tale. No cows in space, but you still need those nutrients. In the Matrix, they ate “a single-celled protein, vitamin, mineral, and amino acid colloid.”

Yum!

Meanwhile, in what passes for our real world, laboratory-generated meat facsimiles are a thing. The folks claiming it will emit less CO2, thus saving the planet (for people pining for real meat), can’t seem to agree on how much CO2 a lab full of people and equipment making meat might generate. I think it would be more. But someone is pretending this is the wave of the future (a real cash cow), so it’s a thing. Normalizing it is also a thing, but plant-based “meat” isn’t the thing they thought, so chemically grown meat has an uphill climb, especially in Florida, where they’ve banned it.

The first bill banning lab-grown meat was signed into law by Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida on May 1. According to SB 1084, the bill prohibits the manufacture for sale, sale, holding or offering for sale, or distribution of cultivated meat in the state.

Florida isn’t known for Cattle ranching, but then, I guess it is.

“We’re fighting back against an ideology that ultimately wants to eliminate meat production in the U.S. and around the globe,” DeSantis said. “In the state of Florida we’ve put down the marker very clearly; we stand with agriculture. We stand with the cattle ranchers. We stand with our farmers because we understand it’s important for the backbone of the state. It’s important for our culture. It’s important for our heritage so the bill that I’m going to sign today is going to say basically take your fake, lab-grown meat elsewhere. We’re not doing that in the state of Florida.”

If they can ‘steer’ the mRNA away from the cows, Florida cowboys might be the heroes in all the new-age  Westerns, only you can’t call them that. “Southerns,” sounds dumb. Someone will work that out, I’m sure – no lab needed.

So, how do people feel about meat from lab-generated cows? Greens would likely object to it the way they do GMOs (can we call them lab-grown vegetables?), but they all lined up for the mRNA thing, which makes them a GMO, IMO.

If we can convince them to spend all their time boycotting themselves, they won’t have any time left to push the lab meat (global warming, grooming, alien invasion, domestic spying, forever wars …).

We could only hope.

The post Florida Bans Manufacture and Sale of Lab-Grown Meat appeared first on Granite Grok.

Dr. Michelle Mullen, Senior Vice President and Chief Design and Impact Officer of The Jed Foundation, discusses the importance of a wholistic approach to college student mental health and their data from working with 144 colleges and universities.

Check out the 2024 JED Campus Impact Report.

The New England Take.

The post The New England Take: 10 years of “Fixing” College Student Mental Health… appeared first on Granite Grok.

After seeing his state holding down the second worst spot in the country for economic prospects Governor Scott reached out to coach extraordinaire Ted Lasso in hopes he can work his magic to turn around Vermont’s bleak future.

Mr. Lasso is famous for taking his American football coaching skills across the pond to the United Kingdom where they play a “different kind of football”.  Despite his hiring intended as a farce that would cause the team to, in his words, “flop like Lebron James cliff diving in Maui” Ted employed his endless optimism to win over his team leading them to win on the field.

Governor Scott hopes Mr. Lasso’s approach to character development as the key to creating a winning team environment will translate to the state’s economy.

Despite Mr. Lasso having no experience with government economics he and his staff are not discouraged.  “If Hunter Biden can handle Ukranian energy ol’ Ted can pump some life into Vermont’s economy” says long-time assistant Coach Beard.  “Ted’s got more spark than an Iranian suicide bomber” beamed the faithful assistant who is known to share his boss’s gift for meaty metaphors.

Despite his boyish joviality Mr. Lasso is taking his role as economic catalyst seriously.  Not one to take opportunity for granted the ebullient coach has immersed himself in the history of economic theory.

“I tell you what, that Adam Smith had more common sense about money than a Jew with a nap-sack full of shekels” commented the coach.  Despite his politically incorrect approach to economic theory his ad hoc staff remain committed to the process thanks to Lasso’s now famous admonition to “be a goldfish”.  Goldfish have only a ten second memory which allows them to be the “happiest critters on the planet” thanks to their ability to quickly forget whatever bad things have occurred.  This advice flies in the face of many in the state who cannot let go of past events, including as far back as two-hundred and fifty years ago when the United States still allowed slavery.

When told Vermont has a Truth and Reconciliation Commission tasked with creating reparations for current and past harm caused by the state that banned slavery in its first year of existence Coach Lasso’s responded saying “That makes about as much sense as a Vegan in a hot-dog eating contest”.  Regarding slavery the iconoclastic Lasso stated proudly “I love slavery.  Why?  I am a slaaaave to success!  You tell Harriet Tubman if her underground railroad doesn’t have stops at Jim-Dandyville and Treasure Island then I don’t want on it!”

Not everyone at the state level is convinced Lasso, who’s previous experience of leading a franchise worth approximately $250 million dollars, has the capacity to handle an entity wielding $40 billion in revenue.  Lasso begs to differ.

“Ever heard of Modern Monetary Theory?  I suggest you go watch Harry Potter again folks ‘cause it’s like magic – poof!  You just print more money.  Taste the rainbow son!  We live in a time where if I want to be a woman well then touch-blue-and-make-it-true – I am now a woman.  My fourth grader goes to school with a four cats and a lemur.  They call them furries.  You just gotta believe it.  Click your heels three times Vermont cause we aint in Kansas anymore.  Are we in Kansas? No, this is VER-MONT.  Which if I’m not mistaken is Keebler elf for Green Mountain State.  These mountains are gonna be mountains of money once I find out where you Yankees keep the printing presses!  WHOO-DADDY!”

After a day of briefing Coach Lasso was surprised to discover most of Vermont’s economy is tied up in government jobs and agencies.  “You’ve got more administrators than a hog’s got warts on its butt Vermont!  I have never seen so many lawyers drinking out of the same trough.  If I wasn’t standing smack dab in the middle of a mountain range I’d’ve thought this was the bottom of the ocean looking at that list of lawyers gaaawlee!”

When asked if he anticipated making any cuts to the bloated agencies Lasso responded with questions of his own.

“How many of these bureaucrats can run a 4.4 second forty-yard dash?  Well we’re gonna find out when they all start scamperin’ to the unemployment line!”

Concerns over the new economic tsar’s approach to team building has led to state-wide protests after he stated his intentions to change the government’s policy on DEI training.  Rather than diversity, equity and inclusion the firebrand coach will be basing hiring on “determination, energy and inspiration”.

“If you don’t like it, then put on a helmet, rub some maple syrup on your boo-boo and go find you a safe-space because this is Vermont.  Last I checked Vermont is whiter than Moby Dick wrastlin’ Frosty the Snowman. Our color spectrum runs mostly from copy paper to cumulus cloud, so I don’t care what color you are, can you do the job?”

After a week of intensive study into the state’s economic woes Governor Scott held a press conference introducing Mr. Lasso to the press where he delivered a spine-tingling speech aimed at isolating the core of the issue.

“Look, let’s be honest Vermont.  This state is bluer than a room full of Smurf’s listening to Otis Redding y’all.  And I tell you what, it’s workin’ about as much as a bunch of teenagers on Tik-Tok.  I have never seen so many rainbows with no pots a gold anywhere.  Sure you’re woke but you’re about to go broke and despite all of these green fields I have yet to spot a leprechaun.  I understand we have a progressive super majority but we’re making about as much progress as the Patriots did against the Chicago Bears back in ’85, ok?  Now I’m all for retro but this communism isn’t doing it folks.  We need more socialism like Bernie Sanders needs another pair of mittens.  We’re looking at fourth and about a ninety-nine yards with five seconds on the clock and there ain’t enough solar power on the sun that can make socialism score us a touchdown.  So less Karl Marx and more Carl’s Jr.’s is what I’m sayin’.”

Despite the deafening silence in the room the following morning Vermont’s number two sector for economic revenue, real estate, saw a 1800% jump after Lasso’s speech was aired on the New York evening news.

The post Bananas: Governor Scott Hires Ted Lasso To Save Economy appeared first on Granite Grok.

Here is a good one: Ross Berry criticizes union leadership on X for not representing union workers. The irony apparently escapes Berry. Berry and his fellow Republican “leaders,” Jason Osborne, Joe Sweeney, etc., do NOT represent Republicans.

Their priorities: turning New Hampshire into a vast shanty-town/open-air-drug market… of course, I am talking about outlawing single-family zoning, legalizing marijuana (for starters), and keeping the bars open until 2 AM.

And they do NOTHING about the priorities of actual Republicans. Our public schools are DEI-sh*tholes. The “solution,” according to Berry and his fellow imposter-Republican-libertarian-ideologues, EFAs and a Parental Bill of Rights … neither of which would do anything about the DEI infesting public schools. They can outlaw single-family-zoning, but not DEI administrators, who are Communists in all but name.

I will be voting for TRUMP in 2024, and then leaving the rest of the ballot blank. To paraphrase Ronald Reagan … I didn’t leave the NHGOP; the NHGOP left me.

The post Irony Alert … Ross Berry appeared first on Granite Grok.

Benjamin Netanyahu should look Tony Blinken in the eye, say go home, and tell Joey we have this. The Joe Biden Administration does not support Israel, and any inference on their part is a sham.

Do not listen to what they say. Look at what they do. Joe Biden would rather appease the Far Left of his party with the hope they will help re-elect him than do what is right and protect and support our most important democratic ally in the cesspool, which is the Middle East.

Tony Blinken continues to visit the Middle East, not to ask Netanyahu what he needs to win this battle but to push for a cease-fire. For what? We have not even done our due diligence to confirm the hostages taken on October 7. Hamas cannot verify the status of the hostages or if they are even alive. Netanyahu is committed to the obliteration of Hamas for the safety and future of his country, and the Biden Administration is doing all it can to hinder that effort. It was Israel, not America that Hamas attacked, and who is the Biden team to challenge the tactics of the Israelis as they defend themselves?

Biden’s international philosophy makes no sense. He is concerned with us protecting the sovereignty of Ukraine for the sake of securing democracy worldwide. At the same time, he is destroying America’s sovereignty and is not committed to defending Israel as she fights to secure hers. This confusing approach by Biden is consistent with his lifelong foreign policy record. He has never been on the correct side of any issue.

Robert Gates, who served as secretary of Defense in the Obama-Biden administration, famously disparaged Joe Biden’s 40-year involvement in foreign policy before he became president: “He has been wrong on nearly every major issue.”

Nothing has changed or improved and America is the loser for the shortcomings of Joe Biden. And Biden calls his foreign policy and familiarity with foreign leaders his strong suit. What does that say about the rest of his portfolio? For years, Israel knew that it had unconditional support from the United States. That was until Barack Obama was elected. The team of Obama and Biden turned their backs on Israel, and now President Biden is following suit.

America is in a bad place if our politicians, especially our commander-in-chief, lead and govern based solely on the decision that is best for fringe groups that will bring in the votes. If that is the case, we can do away with politicians and have a machine deliver a vision based on recent polls.

It is pure projection for Biden to claim a vote for Trump is a vote for anarchy. Joe Biden’s administration can be summed up with a single word: anarchy. Biden and his surrogates will continue their crusade of gaslighting. The difference this time is there is no pandemic to occupy our thoughts, and the msm is covering the events because they have no choice. Joe Biden may lose this election before the convention, and it is all on him and his lousy policies and decisions. Many of us have seen this coming for four years. It is nice to have the other side join us. Welcome to the real world. Joe Biden has done his best to destroy it.

 

The post Biden Does Not Want Israel To Succeed appeared first on Granite Grok.

To all those who are sending in memes, thank you!  Many, many good ones!  Please do share this post, and if you share an individual meme, consider mentioning you saw it on the Grok!

 

 

Q: What do you call a chicken that likes to do calculations?

A: See the Palate Cleansers area for the answer.

 

Speaking of, from this week, Monday Edition and Wednesday Edition.  Also check out my latest Israel-focused meme & commentary post if this is a subject of interest to you.

 

*** Warning, a few possibly off-color ones, in case tender eyes are about ***

 

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

 

Just a little warm-up smile before things go too far.

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

 

Exactly.

 

 

 

 

 

 

How does this man’s tongue not burst into flame at this level of mendacity?

 

 

Peg-out on the cringe-o-meter.

 

 

 

 

You will own, you know, the thing.

 

 

 

 

Remember these two:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If a good or service is OWED you as a “right” then someone else is OBLIGATED to provide / pay for it.  That is slavery.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

PSA – PSA – PSA – PSA – PSA

 

 

They’re corrupt.  All of them.

 

 

Maybe it’s just me… but who the living F has $700K just laying around to do this?

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

 

 

That movie did so much good.  And now it’s practically banned.

 

 

Whether here in NH or elsewhere… I don’t get it.  People flee high taxes and crushing regulations, then vote for the same party that enacted the conditions they fled.

 

 

 

Pegging out the irony-o-meter.

 

 

I’d start bringing my own water.

 

 

 

 

Which is WHY they’re being brought to America.

 

 

 

Just to think.  A 12′ x 18′ American flag is $300.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IN 100%!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A reminder for Monday…

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

Link Section (some mine, some from my Jarhead friend):

 

What 10 Years of U.S. Meddling in Ukraine Have Wrought (Spoiler Alert: Not Democracy) | RealClearInvestigations

Let me be 100% clear – am I happy with Russia’s incursion?  No.  But while I’m not a geopolitical expert, there’s history here:

Powerful figures in Washington took a different view: For them, the Maidan movement represented an opportunity to achieve a longtime goal of pulling Ukraine into the Western orbit. Given Ukraine’s historical ties to Russia, its integration with the West could also be used to undermine the rule of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

…

In his memoir, former senior Obama aide Ben Rhodes acknowledged that Nuland and Pyatt “sounded as if they were picking a new government as they evaluated different Ukrainian leaders.” Rather than dispel that impression, he acknowledged that some of the Maidan “leaders received grants from U.S. democracy promotion programs.”

And from what I’m learning about the US’s meddling all over, I’m losing my belief that the US are the good guys.

—

The Triumvirate Running America Is Not Who You Think | RealClearPolicy

There’s the joke about the Chinese sage discussing the “world turtle” with the tourist who asks what that turtle is standing on, and replies that it’s turtles all the way down.  The question here is the reverse: we know there are puppets.  They’re likely controlled by other puppets.  How far up does that chain of controlling puppets go?

—

House Democrat Leadership Throws Support Behind House Speaker Mike Johnson, Will Table MTG’s Motion To Vacate The Chair * 100PercentFedUp.com * by Danielle

Who supports who?  Uniparty backs uniparty.

—

Bayou Renaissance Man: Gov. Kristi Noem was (and is) right

An interesting take.  Noem is getting hammered hard on this in the court of public opinion.

—

Poll: Donald Trump Now Beating Joe Biden in All Seven Battleground States – The Lid (lidblog.com)

All that, and the vote fraud machine will be working on overtime.

—

Dear Donald Trump: Compassion Should Not Be A Suicide Pact… – Flopping Aces

Embedded quote from Kesse Kelly:

“70% of Americans SAY they care about the border.

Run one video of little Pedro sobbing as he and mother Lupe get loaded into an ICE vehicle a they get deported back to Guatemala and that 70% number will drop to around 5%.

Country is too soft for mass deportation. No chance. 0.”

I concur.  Our empathy and compassion will, among other factors, be the death of this country.  More (links in the original, bolding added):

Americans are indeed a compassionate people, but sometimes compassion can get you killed. Compassion has a role to play in a moral civilization, but when it becomes the driving force to the exclusion of rational thought, it ceases to be a virtue. (See Europe, which since 2015 at Angela Merkel’s direction during the war in Syria, imported tens of millions of military aged men from Africa and the Middle East who are bringing war to the streets, many of whom despise western culture and want to bring Sharia.) You cannot run a country based on teary anecdotes. They make for great media and heartfelt stories, but they make for terrible policy.

Remember that the invasion of Europe accelerated after that image of that little drowned boy – with some evidence it was staged / artificially presented – broke the hearts of all the libs.

—

Here Come The Pre-Planned Riots of 2024! – Flopping Aces

Not just the riots with the enemedia all but fellating the protestors.  Add in the spinning of, and covering for, Soros’ funding.

As a Jew, I want to be the one who pulls the lever to drop this POS through the trap door.  Not just for his anti-American, anti-Western Civilization actions, but for hiding behind his being Jewish.

—

“It Was Brutal”: 2nd Boeing-Linked Whistleblower Dies | ZeroHedge

He had been in good health, and ‘was noted for having a healthy lifestyle,’ according to the report.

How… convenient.

—

Biden is GONE, senile, how can you keep going with this? FLOTUS Jill Biden had to turn him around to face wounded warriors he was talking too…again, he talks to the air…confused walked to opposite (substack.com)

More and more in the open.  Which means, IMHO, increasing impetus to “retire” him.  Feet first.

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

Pick of the Post:

 

 

This is an extraordinary claim.  Per magician and paranormal debunker James Randi, “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof”.

But we do know, because we have videos, of people seizing just after their Jabs (with others still dutifully awaiting their turn!).  We know, through Dr. McCollough (from memory) that 50% of the people who die, die within two days.  It’s somewhat logical / inferential to think that if these things do what they do with clotting, etc., that some people really would seize up uncontrollably.

I remember one instance I read about where a married couple, older, went into the local clinic-in-a-supermarket.  The man went first, seized, coded, and died within a few minutes as the wife screamed for help.  That can’t be a one-off.

So it begs the question: Just how powerful is the OMERTA of silence on this when people, with their own eyes, see evidence but there’s no outcry.  And how does a person with even a shred of a conscience continue to administer the shots after seeing something like that?

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

Palate Cleansers:

 

A: A Mathemachicken.

—

 

 

TRUTH!

—

—

 

I’ll show myself out.

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

And don’t forget… come back Monday for another edition.  Same Meme Time.  Same Meme channel.

Please do consider buying me a coffee.

Buy Me a Coffee

 

>>>>>=====<<<<<

 

The post Friday Meme Overflow-Overflow appeared first on Granite Grok.