Yet another list of schools acting badly, sexual identity political groups acting worse, porn in the public school systems, and the question of the day: WHY do we taxpayers keep putting up with this degeneracy? And yes, we should start making degeneracy and debauchery common words again. As always, reformmating and emphasis mine).
Read through, if you haven’t the time for these all, to see the last snippet.
Here’s a perfect example of the beginning of a great Venn diagram. At least the school admins did the right thing and we need to thank them for it:
- Florida School Cuts Ties With LGBT Group Over Explicit Card Game
Duval County Public Schools has ended a 25-year relationship with a local LGBT youth organization citing “apparent inappropriate conduct.” Jacksonville Area Sexual Minority Youth Network (JASMYN) fell out of favor with the school district after a parent complained after seeing a social media post by the organization showing a minor participating in a lewd novelty card game. The post that raised concerns was about a JASYMN event called “Satargaze,” said Melissa Bernhardt, lead educator for the Duval County chapter of County Citizens Defending Freedom.
The memory game by Drunk Stoned or Stupid involves collecting matched pairs of images of male genitalia of varying sizes and skin colors. It can be found on web stores such as Amazon, and is marked with a disclaimer that it’s for players at least 18 years old.
“The district simply cannot partner with the organization given their use of program materials that the district believes to be inappropriate for use with children,” Duval County Superintendent Diana Greene wrote in a prepared statement released on Nov. 29. “Although JASMYN has been a partner to the district for over 20 years, providing support and resources for students, staff, and the community, we have decided to terminate our current services agreement with their organization.”
In an interview with News4Jax television station, JASMYN CEO Cindy Watson called the post a “regrettable mistake” but said the game was never available to minors.
“Regrettable” translates as “we got caught”. And don’t you just LOVE the framing on this, with JASYMN trying to portray themselves as “normal” (as in “let’s normalize porn and degeneracy”) by decrying Citizens Defending Freedom as “an overreaction to a far-right extremist website spreading inflammatory misinformation about our HIV prevention work with young adults,” . Yeah, you already admitted to it but you’re trying smear the folks that caught you? Man up – you did it and you deserve to lose the contract.
And now Parents are REALLY starting to push back in force. Note which “new” Religious group is now taking part. For years, the Left has “tossed” Christians around wantonly – a lack of fear. Let’s see what happens now:
- Video: A Heavy Police Presence Couldn’t Stop Them – Hundreds Of Conservative Christians And Muslims Joined And Invaded A School Board Meeting To Protect Their Children From “Woke” LGBTQ Policies
Monday’s Dearborn Public Schools board meeting never made it as far as the public comment period. The agenda included a deeply contentious issue: the district’s policy for removing books from school libraries. The meeting was attended by an overflow crowd. Most were young men, some led by Muslim religious leaders— a contrast to the largely Christian groups that have led other efforts to restrict books in Michigan libraries. Some people at the Dearborn meeting held signs with anti-LGBTQ messages.
Many in the crowd were upset by one book in particular: “This Book is Gay,” by Juno Dawson. It’s a young adult non-fiction book on gender and sexuality. The book includes rough pencil drawings of male and female anatomy, which one group brought to the board meeting enlarged, on poster board, saying they were inappropriate for children.
The book was being reviewed for appropriateness by the school district after a parent objected. The parent also asked for the removal of five other books, which are also under review: Push; The Lovely Bones; Eleanor & Park; Red, White and Royal Blue; All Boys Aren’t Blue. Hundreds of protesters packed a Dearborn Public Schools board meeting this week and shut it down with cries of anger over certain LGBTQ books they said are too sexually explicit for children…
Video Player
https://www.usasupreme.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/dearborn.mp4
00:02
00:00
00:18
Use Up/Down Arrow keys to increase or decrease volume.
Too often, the Right has warned the Left “you wouldn’t do this if we were Muslim, would you?”. Now, Muslims are involved.
And we’re back to Hillary’s whackadoodle claim that it takes a village to raise a child. What she REALLY meant is that children actually belong to the village and not the actual parents. Now we have Kamala doing the same thing:
Kamala: Your children are ‘our children’ and that’s why we have to fight climate crisis
“When you see our kids, and I truly believe that they are our children, they are the children of our country, of our communities, I mean, our future is really bright if we prioritize them, and therefore prioritize the climate crisis,” Harris said, confusing many and angering more.
Not your, Parents. Theirs. Period. And people voted her into office with this.
OK, word salad style of speaking that Toes Up has made infamous in doing her nonsense. Perhaps we should take it as complete blather in just filling time and space but having heard this from others on the Left too often, we ought to be paying attention to the supposed second most powerful politician in our country.
And this next thing is starting to “be a thing” – LGBT et al have a Right to porn in schools. Really? Haven’t seen that Article in the US or NH Constitution lately. But “civil rights” groups seem to believe it is. And I bet that NONE of them are Conservative:
- Civil Rights Groups Urge Education Department to Investigate Schools ‘Targeting’ Trans Students
A coalition of seven civil rights groups filed a complaint this week accusing two school districts in Texas of discriminating against transgender and “gender non-conforming” students.
…In the complaint filed Monday with the ED’s Office of Civil Rights, the groups claim that a policy at the Keller ISD that bans books that discuss “gender fluidity” violates Title IX, the federal civil rights legislation that prohibits schools that receive federal funds from discriminating on the basis of sex. The school district reportedly did this last week, according to The Hill.
“The effect of the policy, absent federal civil rights intervention, will be to stigmatize LGBTQ+ and particularly transgender, non-binary, gender diverse, and intersex students in Keller ISD, to uniquely deprive them of the opportunity to read books that reflect their identities, and to create an environment in which unlawful discrimination flourishes,” the complaint reportedly said.
And not once did I see in this post that normal kids have the right to see porn – just those that claim that their sexual identities and proclivities do. OH WAIT! The Left is always yammering about that sex and gender are different – so why are these groups trying to, against their ideological bents, push that identity politics? If they are using “sex”, are they trying to say that porn is only allowed to one of the two sexes (heh!)?
And great question next:
- ‘An explosion’: what is behind the rise in girls questioning their gender identity?
Earlier this year, a team of NHS researchers was asked to investigate why there has been such a huge rise in the number of adolescent biological girls seeking referrals to gender clinics. According to a study commissioned by NHS England, 10 years ago there were just under 250 referrals, most of them boys, to the Gender Identity Development Service (Gids), run by the Tavistock and Portman NHS foundation trust in London. Last year, there were more than 5,000, which was twice the number in the previous year. And the largest group, about two-thirds, now consisted of “birth-registered females first presenting in adolescence with gender-related distress”, the report said.
…The mother of one girl who came out as trans at the age of 12 said it was “very difficult to describe the feeling of being the parent of a trans-identified child”. “We were terrified of being accused of being bigoted,” said the woman, who asked to remain anonymous to protect her child’s privacy. “We felt we were expected to accept her decision unhesitatingly. I felt so apologetic that I was questioning whether my miserable teenage daughter was genuinely a boy,” she said.
And the fear is real – the TransActivists are very militant and are very loud and demanding. Using the argument of “would you want a dead daughter or a live son?” is fear inspiring and promises retribution forever against parents who aren’t willing to have their pre- or early-teen start in taking off-brand drugs to “transition” and undergo surgical mutilation. After all, stories of detransitioners are becoming more and more known and this data factoid is starting to gain ground:
…Published in October, the draft seems to put greater emphasis on the possibility that, for some, particularly pre-pubescent, children, this may be a “transient phase”.
And many of those detransitioners are now admitting that they thought going trans would solve their mental health issues – and it didn’t. The chicken before the egg here is that they are admitting that they didn’t deal with those mental health issues FIRST before considering drugs and a knife to solve those issues.
Some point to puberty, periods and unease with a changing body shape coinciding with the interest in becoming gender non-conforming. Others have questioned whether their child’s autism might be a relevant factor. (The Cass report stated that approximately one-third of children and young people being referred to the Tavistock had autism or other types of neurodiversity.) And others wonder if pre-existing signs of depression and mental health problems have been the cause or the result of gender uncertainty. Possible influences they cite include childhood bullying, sexual harassment and abuse and the hyper-sexualisation of society, or a child’s early understanding of sexism, making them feel it may be easier to live as a man than as a woman.
And we, as Parents and “Prove it!” type folks ought to be demanding much more in the way of peer-reviewed studies with methodologies that can be replicated. They hate that part.
- Ethics prof: current treatment of gender-dysphoric youth not based in strong evidence
Children and adolescents suffering from gender dysphoria in the U.S. need treatment guided by a systematic review of the evidence, according to philosopher Moti Gorin, a professor at Colorado State University, in a November 17 essay for The Hastings Center, a bioethics research institute. American medicine is a global outlier here, as other countries such as Sweden, Finland and the United Kingdom have conducted their own reviews and have pulled back on treatment with drugs and surgery based on the findings, Gorin (pictured) wrote. Gorin pointed to an investigative report that found some U.S. clinics will prescribe puberty blocker drugs or hormones without a thorough evaluation, even after a single meeting, according to Reuters.
The guidelines of major U.S. medical organizations, like the Endocrine Society and the American Academy of Pediatrics, “are not based on systematic reviews of the benefits of these treatments,” according to Gorin. Meanwhile, Sweden, Finland, and the United Kingdom, which have conducted their own reviews of the evidence, all recommend therapy, psychiatric care and treatment for accompanying disorders, such as depression, Gorin wrote. They discourage surgery or drugs like puberty blockers in most cases.
The time to conduct a systematic review is now. There has been a sharp increase in the number of minors diagnosed with gender dysphoria in the U.S. An analysis of insurance claims found that in 2017, 15,172 patients aged 6 to 17 were diagnosed with gender dysphoria; in 2021, the number grew to 42, 167, an increase of roughly 300%. Other countries have also seen an increase in minors presenting with gender dysphoria….
Given the vulnerability of youths with gender dysphoria, inconsistencies in clinical guidance for treating these patients are both ethically concerning and medically consequential. A patient in Sweden, Finland, or England will receive blockers or cross-sex hormones only in exceptional circumstances, while some clinics in the U.S. will prescribe them after a single meeting…
Summed up in two words: shoddy and profit.
And School Districts and School Board Associations are really starting to rethink their trans activism, often with leaving their trumpeted policies now on the floor. Why? Parents are tired of seeing their Constitutional and Parental Rights tossed aside in the name of progress and anti-religion bigotry and are bringing lawsuits. LIke that which has happened to that Randolph school District where a boy decided to call himself a trans girl and sat in the locker room and (reportedly) oogled the teenaged girls volleyball players in various states of undress in their locker room. And when these normal girls, already at that vulnerable age, complained, THEY lost their “right” to the locker room. A lawsuit is turning that around:
- Vermont High School Backs Down Over “Transgender” Incident After ADF Files a First Amendment Lawsuit
Lawyers representing Randolph Union High School (RUHS) in Randolph, Vermont, persuaded school officials to drop their threats of punishment upon receiving a 124-page lawsuit filed by the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF).
At issue: the school’s determination to force its transgender policies upon a 14-year-old girl and her father. For daring to question those policies — i.e., complaining when a male who declared himself to be a female entered the girls’ locker room to observe them undressing — RUHS officials demanded that the student, Blake Allen, “take part in a restorative circle … to help her understand the rights of [transgender] students to access public accommodation … in a manner consistent with their [self-proclaimed] gender identity.”
School officials also demanded that her father, Travis Allen, apologize for a Facebook post challenging the mother of the transgender male/female over the veracity of a Facebook post she made defending her transgender male/female son/daughter.
Travis Allen and his fourteen-year-old daughter, Blake, were punished for expressing their views on a matter of profound public concern: whether a teenage male who identifies as female should be permitted to change in a girls’ locker room regardless of the discomfort experienced by girls in that room.
In objecting to a male being in the room while the girls are changing, Travis and Blake each made comments underscoring that the trans-identifying student is in fact a male, including by using male pronouns.
Indeed, their view of the student’s maleness was foundational to their opinions on appropriate use of the locker room.
Yet, their remarks were too much for Defendants’ transgender orthodoxy — Travis was deemed to have “” the student, while Blake was found guilty of “harassment” and “bullying” — so Defendants disciplined both of them.
misgendered
And last time I looked, the politically made up term “misgendering” (and its associated twin “deadnaming”) isn’t a criminal offense. I’m betting a lot of Trans activists would LOVE to have both codified into law – they don’t care about Free Speech. Fortunately, they aren’t.
It’s happening here in NH as well – I’ve “won” 1/2 my lawsuit against the Gilford School Board in removing the coercion of Government mandated speech (“preferred pronouns”) from their policy. Still working on the “lying to Parents about their child’s transgender status” bit, though.
ADF claimed that by doing so the school officials violated the Allens’ First and Fourteenth Amendment rights:
Defendants are state actors and violate the First Amendment when they attempt to dictate what may be said on matters of public concern. And they cannot discriminate against speech on the basis of its viewpoint.
Yet, that is exactly what happened here. Defendants punished Travis and Blake for saying that a male is a male, as a matter of sex and biology, regardless of the gender identity that the male has assumed.
Fourteenth, eh? I’m going to have to look into that more…
And more on research:
- Gender Transition for Minors: What Does the Research Say?Contrary to what is consistently filling our newsfeeds, there is a disturbing lack of evidence that intervening in a child’s gender development produces beneficial results of any kind. More than that, many studies are showing a strong potential for lasting harm.
…Increasingly, research suggests otherwise. Until recently, activists were able to hide behind a very limited number of studies, some of which even seemed to confirm what those activists wanted to hear. No more. With a 900% increase in young people claiming gender dysphoria over the percentage of Gen Xers who claim likewise, the amount of data in recent years has sharply increased.*
The data is overwhelming. Contrary to what is consistently filling our newsfeeds, there is a disturbing lack of evidence that intervening in a child’s gender development produces beneficial results of any kind. More than that, many studies are showing a strong potential for lasting harm.
Read the links in this linked short post.
Not any healthier or safer?
- Pro-LGBT Left Said Kids Needed Sex Ed For ‘Health’ And ‘Safety,’ But They Aren’t Any Healthier Or Safer
Sexual revolutionaries care about the revolution, not safety or prevention, which is why all data to the contrary will be ignored.
Sexualizing childhood in the name of harm reduction is the latest roll in our rolling sexual revolution. We are told that childhood sexual education is necessary to prevent suicide and interpersonal violence, prevent AIDS, avoid pregnancy, and build a safe environment in schools. According to what is known as “minority stress” theory, people with non-heterosexual orientations experience an endless series of microaggressions, overt rejections, invidious discrimination, or stigmatization that undermines their psychiatric and physical health.
And indeed, the social environment has become much less stressful for sexual minorities than it was 50 years ago. The average age for coming out of the closet among Americans has decreased from 26 years old for those roughly born in the 1970s to 16.9 years old for those born in this century. The average age for same-sex sexual activity is decreased from 19.2 years old for those born in the 1970s to 16.3 for the younger cohort, driven by “marked improvements in the social and legal environments for sexual minorities,” according to UCLA epidemiologist Ilan Meyer. But less stress has not brought with it the better health that the minority stress model predicted. In fact, nearly all psychological and physical problems persist at just about the same rate they did before the gay rights movement.
According to Meyer’s study, “we found little evidence that the social and legal improvements during the past 50 years … have altered the experience of sexual minorities people in terms of exposure to minority stressors and resultant adverse mental health outcomes.” Younger cohorts have higher suicide attempt rates (30 percent) than the older cohort (21 percent). The younger group reports more everyday discrimination, more psychological distress, more stigma, and more internalized homophobia. All in all, according to these scholars, “our findings are clearly inconsistent with the [minority stress] hypothesis.”
In another study, J. Michael Bailey, an early adopter of the minority stress model in the 1990s, could find “no evidence to support” minority stress predictions and, he acknowledges, that “there is much evidence against it.”
Greater tolerance of sexual minorities has not led to better health outcomes or lower suicide rates or to decreases in neuroticism among gay men. Health and psychological results in the tolerant Netherlands, Bailey points out, are not much different from the results of the supposedly intolerant United States. Suicide rates barely budged in nations that have adopted same-sex marriage.
Appealing to widely-accepted values like safety and prevention in order to promote sexual identity education to children was a deliberate rhetorical strategy from LGBT advocates. Kevin Jennings, founder of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), delivered a speech to gay activists on March 5, 1995, laying out the strategy:
If the Radical Right can succeed in portraying us as preying on children, we will lose. Their language — ‘promoting homosexuality’ is one example — is laced with subtle and not-so-subtle innuendo that we are ‘after their kids.’ We must learn from the abortion struggle, where the clever claiming of the term ‘pro-life’ allowed those who opposed abortion on demand to frame the issue to their advantage…
We immediately seized upon the opponent’s calling card — safety — and explained how homophobia represents a threat to students’ safety by creating a climate where violence, name-calling, health problems, and suicide are common.
You mean like the San Francisco Gay Men’s Choir that actually admitted that the goal IS to go after our children? t’s an open slap in the face for we that try hard to keep the innocence of children intact for as long as possible. We know that they aren’t sufficiently developed mentally to realize what is happening – and preying groups like this are trying to take full advantage just like the SJW/CRT-obsessed teachers are in our school systems.
“You think we’ll just corrupt your kids if our agenda goes unchecked? Funny, just this once, you’re correct. We’ll convert your children, bit by bit.”
Calling it “tolerant and fair”. Their words – we just reported it back last year.
GLSEN developed “Safe Space Kits” under Jennings’ leadership. It supplied these kits to schools free of charge. These kits recommended the establishment of ally clubs, playing short films, and using gay-friendly lesson plans and special LGBT themed books in classes. They were all designed to address anti-LGBT prejudice. It was all about prevention.
For Meyer, continued psychological and physiological health disparities are sufficient to show that minorities must be stressed. As they put it, their findings “call attention to the continued need to recognize threats to the health and well-being of sexual minority people across all ages and to remind us that LGBT equality remains elusive.”
Clearly, the only answer LGBT advocates see is to step on the gas. We must accelerate the sexual revolution and expand sexual identity awareness education to ever earlier ages in order to relieve the stress of sexual minorities. Improvements in their health and safety will only come when the sexual revolution has achieved its end. Even incremental improvements cannot be expected until then.
Sexual revolutionaries care about the revolution — not safety or prevention, so all data to the contrary will be ignored or turned to the advantage of the revolution. We see this in the current monkeypox debate, where the transmission of the disease is obscured so as not to stigmatize the gay community by calling attention to certain extreme sexual practices that many gays consider essential to their identity. Whereas masking and social isolation were widely accepted as the indicated means to prevent the spread of Covid, asking gay men to limit their sexual activity to stop the spread of monkeypox is called unrealistic and hateful.
Note that monkeypox quickly disappeared from the media’s radar screens once it became clear that it was yet another homosexual disease based on voluntary interactions.
Scientists who are interested in reality must see that health problems are endemic in the gay community, and not because of a lack of sensitivity on the part of society. Suicide is more prevalent precisely because of dynamics sown into rejecting one’s body as a guide to one’s identity. Anal cancer among gay men is not caused by stigma.
When confronted with reality, sexual revolutionaries embrace an endless, rolling revolution. Science is not likely to guide us out of the revolution, but a willingness to see will — and sometimes science still would have us see.
The post School Boots LGBT Group Over Lewd Card Game! – Stack of Stuff #29 appeared first on Granite Grok.